ZHANG Yongfu,XU Shiqin,YANG Yanbin,et al.Physiological Response of Root System of 27 Grape Germplasms to Aluminum Stress and Screening of Aluminum Tolerant Genetypes[J].Northern Horticulture,2020,44(13):15-24.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20194139]
二十七份葡萄种质根系对铝胁迫的生理响应及耐铝基因型筛选
- Title:
- Physiological Response of Root System of 27 Grape Germplasms to Aluminum Stress and Screening of Aluminum Tolerant Genetypes
- Keywords:
- grape; aluminium stress; physiological response; screening; membership function
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以27份一年生葡萄种质为试材，采用无土栽培的方法，研究了铝胁迫对其根系活力、丙二醛（MDA）含量、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性等的影响及综合评价各种质的耐铝性，以期探明27份葡萄种质在铝胁迫下生理指标的差异，筛选出耐铝性较强的基因型。结果表明：铝胁迫下，供试葡萄种质的根系活力和SOD活性普遍下降，而MDA、H2O2、脯氨酸、蛋白质、可溶性糖、淀粉和Al的含量普遍上升，但不同种质间差异较大。根系活力下降幅度最大的“左优红”与最小的“红比勒特”相差63.12%，SOD下降幅度最大的“超级无核”与略有上升的小叶葡萄相差48.42%；MDA上升幅度最大的“通化-3”与略有下降的“白牛奶”相差67.05%，H2O2上升幅度最大的“玫瑰蜜”与略有下降的“红地球”相差91.47%，脯氨酸上升幅度最大的“通化-3”与略有下降的“红比勒特”相差4.75倍，蛋白质上升幅度最大的“黑加仑”与最小的“赤霞珠”相差11.73倍，可溶性糖上升幅度最大的毛葡萄与最小的“黑提”相差2.36倍，淀粉上升幅度最大的“黑加仑”与略有下降的“北醇”相差1.10倍，Al积累量最多的毛葡萄与积累量最少的“黑玫瑰”相差21.02倍。通过对27份葡萄种质的综合耐铝毒系数进行隶属函数法综合分析，得出耐铝性较强的种质有原产我国南方的小叶葡萄和欧亚种群中的“黑加仑”“红地球”“黑提”，耐铝性较弱的种质有东亚种群中的“高山-2”“通化-3”、毛葡萄和美洲种内杂种“SO4”。总体上在这27份葡萄种质中，欧亚种群的耐铝性普遍强于美洲种群和除小叶葡萄外的东亚种群，其它各种群间的杂交种居中。
- Abstract:
- Using 27 grape germplasms with one year old as test material，soilless cultivation method was used，the effects of aluminum stress on root activity，malondialdehyde (MDA) content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity were studied.In order to find out the difference of physiological indexes of 27 grape germplasms under aluminum stress，the genotypes with strong aluminum tolerance were selected.The results showed that under the stress of aluminum，the root activity and SOD activity of the tested grape germplasm were generally decreased，while the contents of MDA，H2O2，proline，protein，soluble sugar，starch and Al were generally increased.But there were great differences among different germplasms.There was a 63.12% difference between ‘Zuoyouhong’ with the largest decrease in root activity and ‘Hongbilete’ with the smallest；there was a 48.42% difference between ‘Chaojiwuhe’ with the largest decrease in SOD and Vitis sinocinerea with slightly ascending.There was a 67.05% difference between ‘Tonghua-3’ with the largest increase in MDA and ‘Bainiunai’ with slightly declining；there was a 91.47% difference between ‘Meiguimi’ with the largest increase in H2O2 and ‘Red Globe’ with slightly declining；there was a 4.75 times difference between ‘Tonghua-3’ with the largest increase in proline and ‘Hongbilete’ with slightly declining；there was a 11.73 times difference between ‘Blackcurrant’ with the largest increase in protein and ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ with the smallest；there was a 2.36 times difference between V.quinquangularis with the largest increase in soluble sugar and ‘Heiti’ with the smallest；there was a 1.10 times difference between ‘Blackcurrant’ with the largest increase in starch and ‘Beichun’ with a slight decrease.There was a 21.02 times difference between V.quinquangularis the largest accumulation in Al and ‘Heimeigui’ with the smallest accumulation.Through the comprehensive analysis of aluminum resistance coefficient of 27 grape germplasms by membership function method，it was concluded that the germplasm with strong aluminum resistance were V.sinocinerea from south China，and ‘Blackcurrant’‘Red Globe’‘Heiti’ from Eurasian grape population，the germplasm with weak aluminum resistance were ‘Gaoshan-2’‘Tonghua-3’，V.quinquangularis and ‘SO4’ from American interspecific hybrid.In general，among the 27 grape germplasms，the aluminum tolerance of Eurasian population was generally stronger than that of American population and east Asian population except V.sinocinerea，and the hybrids of other interpopulation hybrids were in the middle.
参考文献/References:
[1]杨开娜,骆夜烽,谢家琪,等.酸铝胁迫对苜蓿种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(8):103-109.[2]胡蕾,应小芳,刘鹏,等.铝胁迫对大豆生理特性的影响[J].土壤肥料,2004(2):9-11.[3]YANG Z B,HORST W J.Aluminum-induced inhibition of root growth：Roles of cell wall assembly，structure，and function[J].Springer International Publishing,2015,24:253-274.[4]CHEN J,WANG W H,WU F H,et al.Hydrogen sulfide alleviates aluminum toxicity in barley seedlings[J].Plant Soil,2013,362(1-2):301-318.[5]张永福,任禛,陈泽斌,等.水杨酸对缓解葡萄苗铝毒害的生理机制[J].华北农学报,2015,30(1):182-187.[6]舒畅.耐铝毒水稻(Oryza sativa L.)种质资源的筛选及不同形态N素对水稻幼苗耐铝性的影响[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011.[7]刘武.玉米抗铝毒自交系的筛选、生理检测和基因芯片分析[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2013.[8]齐波,赵团结,盖钧镒.中国大豆种质资源耐铝毒性的变异特点及优选[J].大豆科学,2007,26(2):813-819.[9]熊洁,邹小云,陈伦林,等.油菜苗期耐铝基因型筛选和鉴定指标的研究[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(5):3112-3120.[10]崔翠,程闯,赵愉风,等.52份豌豆种质萌发期耐铝毒性的综合评价与筛选[J].作物学报,2019,45(5):798-805.[11]孔庆山.中国葡萄志[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2004.[12]盛业龙,王莎莎,许美玲,等.应用隶属函数法综合评价不同烤烟品种苗期抗旱性[J].南方农业学报,2014,45(10):1751-1758.[13]黎裕,李舒凡.作物耐酸铝性鉴定概况与设想[J].中国种业,1994(2):27-28.[14]KORIR P C.大豆耐铝毒的鉴定、遗传和QTL分析[D].南京:南京农业大学,2010.[15]OUMA E,LIGEYO D,MATONYEI T,et al.Enhancing maize grain yield in acid soils of western kenya using aluminum tolerance germplasm[J].J Agric Sci Technol,2013（3):33-46.[16]GOH C H,LEE Y.Aluminum toxicity uptake and aluminum toxicity induced rapid root growth inhibition of rice seedlings[J].Plant Biol,1999,42:151-158.[17]BLAMEY F P C,NISHIZAWA N K,YOSHIMURA E.Timing,magnitude and location of initial soluble aluminum injuries to mungbean roots[J].J Soil Sci Plant Nutr,2004,50:67-76.[18]GUO T R,ZHANG G P,ZHOU M X,et al.Effects of aluminum toxicity and cadmium toxicity on growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of two barley genotypes with different Al resistance[J].Plant Soil,2004,258:241-248.[19]孙文君,唐敏,任健,等.8份云南苜蓿属优异种质资源对铝胁迫的生理耐受响应研究[J].草地学报,2018,26(5):1190-1197.[20]刘影.扁穗牛鞭草和多花黑麦草对铝胁迫的生理响应[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2011.[21]吴亚,陈思,张卫红,等.多花黑麦草对铝胁迫的生长生理响应[J].植物科学学报,2018,36(5):755-760.[22]TAYLOR G J,BASU A,BASU U,et al.Al-induced 5-kDa,membrane-bound proteins are associated with resistance to Al in a segregating population of wheat[J].Plant Physiol,1997,114:363-372.[23]赵会娥,贺立源,章爱群,等.铝胁迫对植物光合作用的影响及其机理的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2008,27(1):155-160.[24]李刚,徐芳杰,张奇春,等.铝胁迫对不同耐铝性小麦基因型根尖抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）,2009,35(6):619-625.[25]王月平,章艺,吴玉环,等.植物铝毒害及抗铝毒机制[J].湖北农业科学,2011,50(9):3900-3903.[26]孙建,乐美旺,饶月亮,等.芽期Al3+胁迫对芝麻幼苗生长的影响及种质资源耐铝毒性评价[J].中国油料作物学报,2014,36(5):602-609.
相似文献/References:
[1]单守明,平吉成,刘晶,等.6-BA对染卷叶病毒葡萄光合作用和果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(04):5.
[2]梁浩.枣庄地区气候因子对葡萄生产模式选择的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(04):55.
[3]张广和,于晓丽,栾炳辉,等.倍创与杀菌剂混用对葡萄果实病害的防效评价[J].北方园艺,2013,37(04):127.
[4]李海峰,王瑞华,韩琛,等.新疆葡萄平衡施肥技术发展现状及展望[J].北方园艺,2013,37(04):185.
[5]史洪琴,蒋丽光.中短剪葡萄结实特性比较[J].北方园艺,2014,38(12):34.
SHI Hong-qin,JIANG Li-guang.Comparison of Grape Fruit Characteristics After Moderate and Short Pruning[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):34.
[6]张剑侠,吴行昶,杨亚州.葡萄种间杂种的抗寒性评价[J].北方园艺,2014,38(13):1.
ZHANG Jian-xia,WU Xing-chang,YANG Ya-zhou.Cold-resistance Evaluation in Grape Interspecific Hybrids[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):1.
[7]商佳胤,田淑芬,集 贤,等.果袋颜色对设施葡萄果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(11):42.
SHANG Jia-yin,TIAN Shu-fen,JI Xian,et al.Effect of Fruit Bag Color on Grape Quality in Facility Condition[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):42.
[8]王文平.肃州区非耕地日光温室葡萄反季节高效节水栽培技术[J].北方园艺,2014,38(10):43.
[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):43.
[9]周 恒,饶 鹏,田如英,等.不同栽培方式下五个葡萄品种在贵州铜仁地区的生产表现[J].北方园艺,2014,38(14):22.
ZHOU Heng,RAO Peng,TIAN Ru-ying,et al.Five Grape Varieties Under Different Cultivations in the Production Performance in Guizhou Tongren Area[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):22.
[10]吴久赟,郭峰,杨承时,等.不同叶果比对葡萄果实生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):33.
WU Jiu-yun,GUO Feng,YANG Cheng-shi,et al.Study on the Influence of Different Leaf-fruit Ratio on Growth of Grape[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(13):33.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：张永福（1981-），男，博士，教授，研究方向为果树抗性生理。E-mail:123017360@qq.com.基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目（31660559）；云南省应用基础研究计划资助项目（2017FD087）。收稿日期：2020-03-13