LU Xingxia,GUO Wentao,SUN Yun,et al.Effect of NaCl Stress on Growth and Physiological Response of Limonium sinense in vitro[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(18):154-159.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201618038]
中华补血草组培苗对NaCl胁迫的生长及生理响应
- Title:
- Effect of NaCl Stress on Growth and Physiological Response of Limonium sinense in vitro
- Keywords:
- Limonium sinense (Girard) Kuntze; plantlet in vitro; salt stress; growth; physiological response
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 利用组织培养技术，在含不同浓度NaCl（0、02%、04%、06%、08%、10%）的MS增殖及生根培养基上对叶片分化苗进行盐胁迫处理，测定并分析了中华补血草的生长发育指标（株高、叶数、叶宽、植株鲜样质量、根长）和生理指标（MDA、SOD、Pro、Na+、K+）变化情况。结果表明：在不同浓度NaCl胁迫下，中华补血草组培苗的生长指标均未表现出明显的盐害症状。其中，根长随NaCl浓度增加而增加，10%浓度时主根最长，为对照的39倍；株高随NaCl浓度的增加呈先增加后降低然后再增加的趋势，06%浓度处理时最低，08%浓度处理时最高，10%浓度处理时有所下降，但与08%浓度处理的差异不显著；植株鲜样质量除02%处理与对照差异不显著外，其它处理均显著低于对照且这些处理间的差异不显著；叶数总体上随着盐浓度的增加而减少，10%浓度处理的叶数最少，为对照的1/3；叶宽随盐浓度的增加呈先降低后增加的趋势，04%浓度处理时叶最窄，08%浓度处理时叶最宽，但与10%处理的叶宽差异不显著。生理指标的测定结果表明：MDA含量、SOD活性和Pro含量均随NaCl浓度增加呈先增加后降低的趋势。MDA含量在06%浓度处理时最高，并显著高于对照，在10%浓度处理时最低，且显著低于对照；Pro含量也在06%浓度处理时最高，并显著高于对照，在10%浓度处理时含量虽有所下降，但也显著高于对照；SOD活性在08%浓度处理时最高，其次为10%浓度处理，二者间差异显著，且均显著高于对照。Na+、K+含量均显著高于对照，且Na+、K+含量总体上随NaCl浓度的增加而显著增加，K+/Na+比随NaCl浓度的增加出现先降低后增加的现象，在08%浓度处理时比值最小，10%浓度处理时K+/Na+比值显著增加。综上所述，组培苗可以耐含NaCl为10%浓度的盐汁生境，在其受到盐胁迫时，可以通过增加SOD活性和Pro含量以及维持高K+/Na+比值来保护细胞膜系统，增强吸水能力，缓解盐害。
- Abstract:
- Differentiation seedlings was cultured on the MS proliferation and rooting medium with different NaCl concentration (0,02%,04%,06%,08%,10%)，and the growth (plant height，the number of leaves，leaf width，fresh weight，root length) and physiological (MDA,SOD,Pro,Na+，K+) indexes were measured and analyzed.The results showed that the growth of plantlet in vitro grew well under salt stress.With the NaCl stress increasing，the root length increased and was the longest in the NaCl concentration of 10%，and it was 39 times of the control；the plant height increased first then decreased and then increased again，it was the lowest in the NaCl concentration of 06% and the highest in the NaCl concentration of 08%，when the NaCl concentration was 10%，the plant height decreased to some extent，but the difference of the plant height was not significant between the NaCl concentration of 08% and 10%；the differenc of fresh weight in NaCl concentration of 02% was not significant compared with the control，the remaining treatments (NaCl concentration of 04%-10%) were significantly lower than the control，and the difference among them were not significant；the number of leaves decreased with the increase of the NaCl concentration，the number of leaves was the least in NaCl concentration of 10%，and was controlled by 1/3；the leaf width increased then decreased，the leaf width was the most narrow in the NaCl concentration of 04%，and the leaf width was the widest in the NaCl concentration of 08%，the difference of the leaf width was not significant between the NaCl concentration of 08% and 10%.The results of the physiological indexes showed that,MDA content，the activity of SOD and Pro content increased then decreased with the NaCl stress increasing.The contents of MDA were the highest and the lowest respectively in the NaCl concentration of 06% and 10%，and compared with the control，the contents of MDA were significantly higher in the NaCl concentration of 06% and lower significantly in the NaCl concentration of 10%；the contents of Pro were significantly higher than that of CK whether the NaCl concentration of 06% or 10%，and the contents of Pro was the highest in the NaCl concentration of 06%，and the contents of Pro decreased in the NaCl concentration of 10%；the activities of SOD were significantly higher than that of CK whether the NaCl concentration of 08% or 10%，and the activities of SOD was the highest in the NaCl concentration of 08%，and the second was the NaCl concentration of 10%.The contents of Na+ and K+ were all significantly higher that of CK，and also significantly increased with the NaCl stress increasing.With the NaCl stress increasing，ratio of K+/Na+ decreased then increased，ratio of K+/Na+ was the lowest in the NaCl concentration of 08%，and significantly increased in the NaCl concentration of 10%.In conclusion，L.sinense could endure as high as 10% NaCl，it could protect cell membrane system and enhance water absorption capacity to alleviating plant salinity injury by increasing the activities of SOD，the content of Pro and maintaining high K+/Na+ ratio.
参考文献/References:
[1]马丰山,周署名.中华补血草的开发价值初探[J].中国野生植物,1991(2):34-35. [2]辛莎莎,谭玲玲,初庆刚.中华补血草盐腺发育的解剖学研究[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(10):1995-2000. [3]董蒙蒙,喻樊,刘佳,等.中华补血草5种黄酮类化合物抗氧化和抗肿瘤活性的比较[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(2):297-299. [4]喻樊.HPLC法同时测定濒危植物-中华补血草中异槲皮苷、桑色素、槲皮素、木犀草素和芹菜素的含量[J].药物分析杂志,2014,34(4):632-635. [5]严卫,肖义军,林尧,等.中华补血草多酚诱导白血病细胞HL-60凋亡的研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2014,30(2):119-124. [6]曲有乐,高欣,崔宇鹏.中华补血草抗氧化活性研究[J].海峡药学,2012,24(12):33-36. [7]汤新慧,徐力致,高静.中华补血草根提取物抗肿瘤活性的实验研究[J].时珍国医国药,2010,21(4):917-918. [8]赵宝泉,王茂文,丁海荣,等.江苏沿海滩涂盐生药用植物资源研究[J].中国野生植物资源,2015,34(6):44-50. [9]田福平,时永杰,陈子萱.我国补血草属野生植物资源的分布及研究现状[J].草业与畜牧,2010(3):49-52. [10]王俪梅,李青松,周春菊,等.无菌培养条件下不同基因型小麦耐盐性及其生理机制研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):99-104. [11]苏婷,史燕山,骆建霞.盐胁迫及贮藏时间对4种补血草种子发芽特性的影响[J].种子，2011,30(12):90-93. [12]李妍.多种盐胁迫对中华补血草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2009(5):54-57. [13]丁烽,王宝山.NaCl对中华补血草叶片盐腺发芽及其泌盐速率的影响[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(8):1593-1599. [14]张侠,尹海波,陈世华,等.NaCl胁迫对中华补血草活性氧清除能力的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(21):10837-10839. [15]骆建霞,张婷,王娜,等.中华补血草和德国补血草的耐盐性比较[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014，42(9):171-175. [16]ZHANG Y，CHEN S H，HUA H L，et al.Cloning of Syntaxin gene in Limonium sinense kuntze[J].Agricultural Science and Technology，2012，13(2):261-264. [17]刘瑜,陈世华,尹海波,等.中华补血草金属硫蛋白基因的克隆及高盐处理下的表达模式分析[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版)，2011,24(2):121-125. [18]卢兴霞,骆建霞,任志雨,等.中华补血草的组织培养和植株再生体系优化[J].天津农业科学,2016,22(1):23-26. [19]高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006. [20]韩冰,庞永奇,常丽丽,等.不同浓度的 NaCl处理对海马齿叶片中Na+和K+含量的影响[J].热带生物学报，2012,3(2):166-173. [21]郑秀芳,王桔红,汪小东,等.NaCl胁迫对披针叶黄华愈伤组织生理特性的影响[J].中草药,2013,44(21):3048-3052. [22]彭湖,代锦,呼天明.无菌培养条件下8个紫花苜蓿品种的苗期耐盐性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,38(4):176-182. [23]岳延峰,马辉,倪细炉,等.NaCl和NaHCO3对黄花补血草胁迫的生理生化特征[J].北方园艺，2010(5):11-14. [24]TESTER M，DAVENPORT R.Na+tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants[J].Ann Botany,2003,91(5):503-527. [25]萨如拉,刘景辉,刘伟,等.盐碱胁迫对燕麦幼苗Na+、K+含量及产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2014，23(3):50-54.
相似文献/References:
[1]张存智,王 敏,魏 鹏.枣组培苗试管外微嫁接技术研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(11):100.
ZHANG Cun-zhi,WANG Min,WEI Peng.Study on the Outside Tube Micrografting Techniques for the Tissue Cultured Zizpihus jujube Buds[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(18):100.
[2]李京,张建瑛,张妍妍,等.“美登”蓝莓组培苗移栽技术研究[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):36.
LI Jing,ZHANG Jian-ying,ZHANG Yan-yan,et al.Study on the Transplanting Technology of Tissue Cultured Seedling of ?Blueberry ‘Blomidon’[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(18):36.
[3]赵 超,董 然,顾德峰,等.不同空气湿度对对开蕨组培苗生长状况的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(08):24.
ZHAO Chao,DONG Ran,GU De-feng,et al.Effect of Different Air Humidity on Growth Status of Tissue Culture Seedlings of Phyllitis japonica[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(18):24.
[4]田 河,师校欣,杜国强,等.基质及营养液对苹果矮砧组培苗移栽后生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(06):8.
TIAN He,SHI Xiao-xin,DU Guo-qiang,et al.Effect of Substrate and Nutrient Solution Supplied on Growth of Plantlets of Apple Dwarf Rootstocks in vitro [J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(18):8.
[5]王安石,王健,林明光.红掌组培苗工厂化生产污染控制技术[J].北方园艺,2013,37(08):58.
WANG An-shi,WANG Jian,LIN Ming-guang.The Techniques of Pollution Control in Factory Production of Anthurium andraeanum Plantlets[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(18):58.
[6]权俊萍,戴丽娜,唐徐林,等.薰衣草组培苗驯化移栽过程中形态解剖学比较[J].北方园艺,2012,36(03):55.
QUAN Jun-ping,DAI Li-na,TANG Xu-lin,et al.Comparative Study on Morphology and Anatomy of Lavender During Transplantation and Acclimatization[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(18):55.
[7]钟波.洋桔梗组培苗生产关键技术研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(16):90.
ZHONG Bo.Study on Key Technology of Production Tissue Culture Seedling of Enstoma grandiflorun[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(18):90.
[8]赵红霞,高文强,张利,等.杜鹃组培苗的练苗技术研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(07):75.
ZHAO Hong-xia,GAO Wen-qiang,ZHANG Li,et al.Study on the Hardening-seedling Technology of Tissue Culture Seedlings of Rhododendron simsii Planch[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(18):75.
[9]张正海,张悦,李爱民,等.五味子组培苗生长优化研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(10):133.
ZHANG Zheng-hai,ZHANG Yue,LI Ai-min,et al.Optimized Study on Growth of Tissue Culture Sprout of Schisandrachinensis(Turcz.)Baill[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(18):133.
[10]韦坤华,李林轩,王美英,等.山豆根组培苗的质量分析[J].北方园艺,2012,36(13):185.
WEI Kun-hua,LI Lin-xuan,WANG Mei-ying,et al.Analysis on the Ouality of Tissue-cultured Plantlets of Sophora tonkinensis Gapnep.[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(18):185.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：卢兴霞（1978-），女，硕士，副教授，现主要从事园艺植物遗传育种和逆境生理生化等研究工作。E-mail：xingxialu@126.com.责任作者：任志雨（1968-），男，博士，教授，现主要从事园艺植物栽培等研究工作。基金项目：国家星火计划资助项目（2013GA610012）；天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划资助项目（14JCYBJC30100）；天津农学院科学研究发展基金资助项目（2011N12）；天津市高等学校学科领军人才培养计划资助项目（津教委人[2013]12号)；天津市高等学校优秀青年教师资助项目（津教委办[2013]171号）。