GAO Xu,KONG Xiangjun,GUO Yunong,et al.Effects of Chemical Fertilizers Replacement by Biogas Slurry on Yield,Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Muskmelon[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(14):25-31.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20184575]
沼液替代化肥对甜瓜产量品质及养分吸收的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Chemical Fertilizers Replacement by Biogas Slurry on Yield,Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Muskmelon
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以“绿宝石”薄皮甜瓜为试材，采用田间小区随机区组试验，设置5个处理(CK:不施肥，CF:常规施肥，FR:化肥减量，BS:沼液替代，BR:沼液减量)，研究了集约化养猪场粪肥和废水发酵后的沼液通过水肥一体化管道施用替代化肥对日光温室栽培甜瓜产量、品质及养分吸收的影响。结果表明：1)不同处理间甜瓜根、茎、叶、果实的干物质量和养分含量及养分携出量均无显著差异，甜瓜温室栽培下每形成1 000 kg经济产量对N、P2O5、K2O吸收量分别为4.16~4.68、1.04~1.36、7.07~7.85 kg，N、P2O5、K2O需求比例平均为1∶0.30∶1.72。2)不同处理间甜瓜单果质量和产量均无显著差异；BS、BR处理甜瓜可溶性总糖含量、可溶性固形物含量、糖酸比较CF处理显著提高。3)BS、BR和FR处理节本增收效果显著，较CF处理分别增效26.77%、8.49%和3.37%;BR和FR处理N、P、K养分利用率较CF处理分别提高12.47%、9.84%、15.26%和11.10%、9.62%、41.47%。综上，沼液水肥一体化可以完全替代化肥追施，实现沼液资源化利用。
- Abstract:
- Taking thin-skinned muskmelon‘Green Gem’ as test material,the randomized block field experiment was used.Five treatments (CK (check without fertilizer),CF (conventional fertilization),FR (fertilizers reduction),BS (biogas slurry replacement),BR (biogas slurry reduction)) were set up,and the effect of biogas slurry fertilized by intensive pig farm and fermented wastewater on the yield,quality and nutrient uptake of muskmelon grown in greenhouse were studied.The results showed that，1) there was no significant difference in dry matter,nutrient contents and nutrient uptakesin roots,stems,leaves and fruits of muskmelon in different treatments.The absorption of N,P2O5 and K2O for each 1 000 kg economic output of the muskmelons was 4.16-4.68 kg,1.04-1.36 kg and 7.07-7.85 kg,respectively；and the average ratio of N,P2O5 and K2O was 1∶0.30∶1.72 under greenhouse cultivation.2) No significant difference was observed in single fruit weight and yield of muskmelon in different treatments.The soluble total sugar content,soluble solids content and sugar-acid ratio of muskmelon biogas slurry replacement (BS) and reduction(BR) treatments were significantly higher than conventional fertilization treatment.3) The biogas slurry (BS,BR) treatments and fertilizer reduction (FR) treatment had a significant effect on the costs savings and increased benefits,which was 26.77%,8.49% and 3.37% higher than that of the conventional fertilizer (CF) treatment.Meanwhile,the nutrient utilization rates of N,P and K were increased by 12.47%,9.84%,15.26%,respectively in BR treatment and by 11.10%,9.62%,41.47% in FR treatment,when compared with the conventional fertilization (CF).In summary,the biogas slurry could completely replace chemical fertilizers and realize the utilization of biogas slurry resources.
参考文献/References:
[1]吴信,万丹,印遇龙.畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用与现代生态养殖模式[J].农学学报,2018,8(1):163-166.[2]GALVEZ A,SINICCO T,CAYUELA M,et al.Short term effects of bioenergy by-products on soil C and N dynamics,nutrient availability and biochemical properties[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems &Environment,2012,160:3-14.[3]许文志,欧阳平,罗付香,等.中国畜禽粪污处理利用现状及对策探讨[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(23):106-112.[4]郑学博,樊剑波,周静,等.液化肥配施对红壤旱地土壤养分和花生产量的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):675-684.[5]JIANG X,SOMMER S G,CHRUSTENSE K V.A review of the biogas in dustry in China[J].Energy Policy,2011,39:6073-6081.[6]中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会,农业部.全国农村沼气发展“十三五”规划[EB/OL].(2017-01-25)[2017-10-17].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-02/10/content_5167076.htm.[7]王淑霞,阮应君,周伟国,等.基于沼液余热回收的沼气工程系统净产能特性[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(10):200-209.[8]丁京涛,沈玉君,孟海波,等.沼渣沼液养分含量及稳定性分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2016,18(4):139-146.[9]韩敏,刘克锋,王顺利,等.沼液的概念、成分和再利用途径及风险[J].农学学报,2014(10):54-57.[10]曹汝坤,陈灏,赵玉柱.沼液资源化利用现状与新技术展望[J].中国沼气,2015,33(2):42-50.[11]黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等.基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):362-371.[12]张昌爱,刘英,曹曼,等.沼液的定价方法及其应用效果[J].生态学报,2011,31(6):1735-1741.[13]吕淑敏,刘铁干,赵会杰.不同沼液用量对夏玉米产量的影响[J].中国沼气,2015,33(4):77-81.[14]杨乐,张凤华,庞玮,等.沼液灌溉对绿洲农田土壤养分的影响[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2011,29(5):542-545.[15]黄昌勇,徐建明.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010.[16]农业部全国土壤肥料总站.NY/T 300-1995,有机肥料速效磷的测定[S].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.[17]农业部全国土壤肥料总站.NY/T 301-1995,有机肥料速效钾的测定[S].北京:中国农业出版社,1995.[18]王梅.养猪场粪便沼液利用效果评价[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.[19]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2013:264-271.[20]曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007:24-54.[21]EU Nitrogen Expert Panel.Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)an indicator for the utilization ofnitrogen in agriculture and food systems[R].Wageningen University,2015.[22]张娥珍,樊学军.嫁接对薄皮甜瓜叶片生理效应及果实可溶性蛋白质、总糖含量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2009,22(5):1310-1313.[23]牛晓丽,周振江,李瑞,等.根系分区交替灌溉条件下水肥供应对番茄可溶性固形物含量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(5):893-901.[24]杨润,孙钦平,赵海燕,等.沼液在稻田的精确施用及其环境效应研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(8):1566-1572.[25]王桂良,张家宏,王守红,等.沼液替代化肥氮对冬小麦产量、品质及生长发育的影响[J].农业资源与环境学报,2018,35(5):467-475.[26]赵自超,付龙云,王昭晴,等.沼液追施对设施甜椒产量、品质及养分吸收的影响[J].中国沼气,2018,36(4):85-88.[27]汪吉东,曹云,常志州,等.沼液配施化肥对太湖地区水蜜桃品质及土壤氮素累积的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):379-386.[28]吴兴洪,朱青,陈正刚,等.酒糟沼液对辣椒化肥减量增效的应用[J].北方园艺,2018(20):105-112.[29]林多,黄丹枫.基质栽培甜瓜矿质营养吸收规律的研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2003(1):112-116.[30]吴海华,陈波浪,盛建东,等.南疆全立架露地栽培甜瓜平衡施肥参数的初步研究[J].新疆农业科学,2012,49(10):1793-1798.[31]隋好林,陈晓峰,秦娜,等.沼液滴灌对番茄产量、品质和土壤理化性状的影响[J].山东农业科学,2016(2):80-84.[32]吴树彪,崔畅,张笑千,等.农田施用沼液增产提质效应及水土环境影响[J].农业机械学报,2013,44(8):118-125,179.
相似文献/References:
[1]王晓静,马文平,王芳.甜瓜采后致病菌交链菌的防治方法研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):103.
WANG Xiao-jing,MA Wen-ping,WANG Fang.Study on Prevention Method of Alternariasp. After Melon Postharvest[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):103.
[2]宁雪飞,韩小路,王贤磊,等.一种快速筛选转抗霜霉病基因甜瓜种子的方法研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(01):102.
NING Xue-fei,HAN Xiao-lu,WANG Xian-lei,et al.The Screening of Transgenic Plants Resistant to Downy Mildew Disease in Melon[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):102.
[3]王晓梅,刘国宁,程丽,等.部分黄瓜和甜瓜品种对霜霉病的抗性及其组分研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):106.
WANG Xiao-mei,LIU Guo-ning,CHENG Li,et al.Study on Resistance to Downy Mildew of Some Cucumber and Melon Varieties and Its Component[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):106.
[4]张君艳,罗爱玉,张君君.河西地区杂交甜瓜大田制种生产技术[J].北方园艺,2013,37(14):62.
[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(14):62.
[5]苏艳,王盼乔,胡建斌.十五份甜瓜种质苗期性状的聚类分析及相关分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(07):5.
SU Yan,WANG Pan-qiao,HU Jian-bin.Clustering and Correlation Analysis of 15 Cucumis melo L.Germplasms Based on the Phenotypic Traits of the Seedling Period[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):5.
[6]赵九洲,胡立盼,徐志然,等.甜瓜幼苗耐盐碱性及缓解盐碱胁迫γ-氨基丁酸浓度的筛选[J].北方园艺,2014,38(09):1.
ZHAO Jiu-zhou,HU Li-pan,XU Zhi-ran,et al.The Screening of Melon（Cucumis melo L.）Seedling Cultivars for Salt-alkaline Tolerance and the Concentration of γ-aminobutyric Acid Alleviating Salt-alkaline Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):1.
[7]王喜涛,周秀艳,辛 明,等.盐胁迫对甜瓜种子发芽的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(09):7.
WANG Xi-tao,ZHOU Xiu-yan,XIN Ming,et al.Effect of NaCl Stress on Seed Germination of Melon[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):7.
[8]宋 羽,卢青成,王 浩.适合新疆戈壁地区甜瓜穴盘育苗的基质相对含水量的探究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(09):53.
SONG Yu,LU Qing-cheng,WANG Hao.Research on Suitable Substrate Water Content for Melon Plug-seedling in Gobi District of Xinjiang[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(14):53.
[9]苏丽影,宋述尧,赵春波,等.玉米秸秆混合基质对甜瓜穴盘苗生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(12):28.
SU Li-ying,SONG Shu-yao,ZHAO Chun-bo,et al.Effect of Mixed Substrates of Corn Stalk on Plug Seeding of Muskmelon[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(14):28.
[10]王爱玲,张敏,廖新福,等.甜瓜“黄醉仙”下胚轴再生体系的初步建立[J].北方园艺,2013,37(12):100.
WANG Ai-ling,ZHANG Min,LIAO Xin-fu,et al.Preliminary Establishment of Melon cv.‘Huangzuixian’ Regeneration System[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(14):100.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：高旭(1992-)，男，硕士研究生，研究方向为设施栽培水肥调控技术。E-mail:515194387@qq.com.责任作者：陈竹君(1964-)，女，博士，副教授，博士生导师，现主要从事养分利用与环境的教学与科研等工作。E-mail：zjchen@nwsuaf.edu.cn.基金项目：国家重点研发计划资助项目(2018YFD0201300)；杨凌示范区科技计划资助项目(2016NY-08)；陕西省农业专项资金资助项目（2016）。收稿日期：2019-03-06