[1]胡秀月.芒果劣种树不同改接换冠方法对比研究[J].北方园艺,2015,39(12):26-28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201512007]
HU Xiu-yue.Comparison Study on Different Grafting Change Method of Poor Quality Mango[J].Northern Horticulture,2015,39(12):26-28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201512007]
点击复制
HU Xiu-yue.Comparison Study on Different Grafting Change Method of Poor Quality Mango[J].Northern Horticulture,2015,39(12):26-28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201512007]
芒果劣种树不同改接换冠方法对比研究
《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]
卷:
第39卷
期数:
2015年12
页码:
26-28
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-06-30
- Title:
- Comparison Study on Different Grafting Change Method of Poor Quality Mango
- 文章编号:
- 1001-0009(2015)12-0026-03
- Keywords:
- mango; poor quality varieties; variety renewal
- 分类号:
- S 667,704+,3
- 文献标志码:
- B
- 摘要:
- 对芒果劣种树改接换冠的不同树体状况、不同嫁接方式、方法进行了对比试验观察，指出针对不同树体状况和不同改接目的应采取的改接换冠方法。结果表明：高位换种和低位换种均可取得较好的效果。从短期效益看，高位换种+断根处理效果更好；但从长远效益看，低位换接更便于树体的更新和管理。改接换冠同时进行根系更新对树龄较大的果树尤为重要。
- Abstract:
- Comparison trial observation was conducted to different the mango trees conditions with canopy renewal，different grafting methods，pointed out that for the different trees and different aims to grafting trees. The results showed that high level and low-level renewal could be achieve better results. From the short-term efficiency，high renewal+root cutting achieved better results；however，from a long term efficiency，low level renewal made it easier for tree update and management. To renewal the crown plus root cutting was particularly important to update the older fruit trees.
参考文献/References:
[1]庞世卿.海南芒果高接换冠实现品种优化[J].热带农业科学,2001(1):19-21.[2]陆弟敏.芒果多头高接换种技术[J].果树栽培,2001(7):11.[3]王才发,马蔚红,陆军迎.成龄芒果园改造技术措施的探讨[J].广西热作科技,1999(1):34-36. [4]李日旺,黄国弟,周俊岸,等.芒果新品种比较试验[J].广东农业科学,2003(2):20-24.[5]尼章光,黄家雄,张林辉,等.芒果老树换种更新技术研究初报[J].热带农业科技,2003(4):42-44.
相似文献/References:
[1]江敏,胡小军,焦铭珊,等.柠檬酸-纳米氧化锌对芒果采后保鲜效果的影响[J].北方园艺,2012,36(11):172.
JIANGMin,HUXiao-jun,JIAOMing-shan,et al.PreservativeEffectofCitricAcidandNano-ZnOTreatmentonStorageof MangoatRoomTemperature[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(12):172.
更新日期/Last Update:
2015-08-09