[1]邹原东,韩振芹,陈秀新,等.干旱胁迫对蓝羊草渗透调节物质和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(23):71-75.
　ZOU Yuan-dong,HAN Zhen-qin,CHEN Xiu-xin,et al.Effect of Drought Stress on Osmotic Adjustment Substance and Antioxidative Activity of Leymus chinensis[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):71-75.
点击复制

干旱胁迫对蓝羊草渗透调节物质和抗氧化酶活性的影响

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S] 卷: 第37卷 期数: 2013年23期 页码: 71-75 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-12-15
Title:
Effect of Drought Stress on Osmotic Adjustment Substance and Antioxidative Activity of Leymus chinensis
文章编号:
1001-0009（2013）23-0071-05
作者:
邹原东; 韩振芹; 陈秀新; 石进朝
北京农业职业学院，北京 102442
Author(s):
ZOU Yuan-dong；HAN Zhen-qin；CHEN Xiu-xin；SHI Jin-chao
Beijing Vocational College of Agricultural，Beijing 102442
关键词:
蓝羊草; 干旱胁迫; 完全随机; 抗氧化酶
Keywords:
Leymus chinensis; drought stress; completely random; antioxidant enzymes
分类号:
S 543.901
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以蓝羊草为试材，以持续浇水处理为对照，采用2因素完全随机设计，利用盆栽方法研究了干旱胁迫对蓝羊草相对含水量、渗透调节物质及抗氧化酶活性的影响。结果表明：叶片相对含水量随着干旱胁迫程度的加深而下降，2周后达到20%左右，叶片的保水性较好，植株的耐旱性较强；在自然失水的条件下丙二醛（MDA）含量的积累逐渐增多，而且后期升高较为明显，植株对干旱的反映较为敏感；脯氨酸（Pro）含量随着叶片失水也随之升高，含水量与Pro含量呈显著负相关（相关系数为-0.865P=0.026<0.05），其含量的积累对于蓝羊草是伤害反应，与抗旱性无关；可溶性蛋白质含量在干旱胁迫下呈现出快速下降后缓慢升高的趋势，超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性和过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性与对照相比增加显著（P<0.05），过氧化物酶（POD）活性与对照差异极显著，在抵御干旱方面共同发挥作用。
Abstract:
With Leymus chinensis as experimental material，control was sustainable watering，this test adopted the two factors completely random design.The effect of drought stress on relative water content，osmotic adjustment substance and antioxidant enzymes activity were studied by pot experiment.The results showed that relative water content was decreased with aggravation of drought stress，reached about 20% after 2 weeks.Water retention of leaves was better，and with good drought tolerance.In the condition of natural dehydration the accumulation of MDA was increased gradually，particularly at later stages of drought，and plant was sensitive to drought.Pro content increased with the water stress time.A significant correlation existed between relative water content and Pro content(.R=-0.865，P=0.026<0.05).Accumulation of Pro content was a wound response for plant，and it was independent of drought resistance.Under drought stress soluble protein content increased at first but later decreased.SOD and CAT activity in control were lower than other treatments (P<0.05)，and both of them played a common role in preventing drought.POD activity in control was extremely lower than other treatments (P<0.01).

参考文献/References:

[1] 武菊英,王国进.可持续旱景园林与观赏草[J].科技潮,2003(10):42-43.?

[2] 宋晓青.观赏草园林应用模式研究[J].北方园艺,2011(23):85-88.
[3] 杨丽娟,王海洋.耐旱园林植物在节水型园林中的应用[J].南方农业(园林花卉版),2007(6):52-53.
[4] 沈文森.观赏草在北京奥林匹克公园中心区的应用[J].北京园林,2008(4):36-39.
[5] 尹新彦,储博彦,田银萍,等.我国观赏草研究与应用现状[J].河北林业科技,2012(2):40-43,51.
[6] 武菊英,滕文军,王庆海,等.多年生观赏草在北京地区的生长状况与观赏价值评价[J].园艺学报,2006,33(5):1145-1148.
[7] 王嘉铭，马希斌.节约型绿地地被植物的筛选与应用[J].新农业,2012(2):45-46.
[8] 白淑媛,梁芳,蔺艳等.适生地被植物的选择与应用[J].北京园林,2007,23(4):31-35.
[9] 张宪政.植物生理学实验技术[M].沈阳：辽宁科技出版社,1989.
[10]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[11]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.
[12]刘锦川,云锦凤.披碱草属3种牧草幼苗对水分胁迫的响应[J].种子,2010,29(9):17-20.
[13]吴银明,王平,刘洪升,等.分根PEG胁迫对羊草幼苗植物量、活性氧代谢及脯氨酸含量的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2008,43(2):114-119.[14]刘晓东,李洋洋,何淼,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫对玉带草生理特性的影响[J].草业学报,2012,29(5):687-693.
[15]孔兰静,李红双,张志国,等.三种观赏草对土壤干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].中国草地学报,2008,30(4):40-45.
[16]蒋明义,杨文英,徐江,等.渗透胁迫诱导水稻幼苗的氧化伤害[J].作物学报,1994,20(6):734-738.
[17]李广敏,唐连顺,商振清,等.渗透胁迫对玉米幼苗保护酶系统的影响及其与抗旱性的关系[J].河北农业大学学报,1994,17(2):1-4.
[18]张智,夏宜平,常乐,等.3种观赏草在自然失水胁迫下的生理变化与耐旱性关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(12):17-20.[19]胡淑静,易小林,李名扬.费斯塔和高羊茅在重庆地区夏季干热条件下的适应性研究[J].草业科学,2009,26(4):106-109.[20]潘伟彬,邓恢.4种草本水土保持植物的耐旱生理特性[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2009,30(3):305-308.
[21]李州,彭燕,苏星源.不同叶型白三叶抗氧化保护及渗透调节生理对干旱胁迫的响应[J].草业学报,2013,22(2):257-263.
[22]孔兰静,彭卫东,柳玉芳,等.干旱胁迫对三种观赏草叶片渗透调节的影响[J].中国草地学报,2010,32(3):82-87.
[23]李秀玲,刘开强,杨志民,等.干旱胁迫对４种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(1):76-82.?
[24]任文伟,钱吉,马骏,等.不同地理种群羊草在聚乙二醇胁迫下含水量和游离脯氨酸含量的比较[J].生态学报,2000,20(2):349-352.
[25]卢少云,陈斯平,陈斯曼,等.三种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化[J].园艺学报,2003,30(3):303-306.
[26]陈明林,王友保.水分胁迫下外来种铜锤草和本地种酢浆草的生理指标比较研究[J].草业学报,2008,17(6):52-59.
[27]刘惠芬,高玉葆,张强,等.不同种群羊草幼苗保护酶系统对干旱的反应及其生理生态适应[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(6):641-646.
[28]闫成仕,水分胁迫下植物叶片抗氧化系统的响应研究进展[J].烟台师范学院学报（自然科学版），2002,18(3)：220-225.

相似文献/References:

[1]方 晶.高压电场对干旱胁迫下黄瓜种子萌发的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(13):41.
　FANG Jing.Effect of High Voltage Electric Field on Germination of Cucumber Seeds Under Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):41.
[2]王贵平,王金政,薛晓敏,等.叶面喷施甜菜碱对干旱胁迫下苹果幼树[J].北方园艺,2014,38(12):10.
　WANG Gui-ping,WANG Jin-zheng,XUE Xiao-min,et al.Effect of Spraying Glycinebetaine on Physiological Responses of Apple Young Trees Under Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):10.
[3]张 爽,赵 纯,董 然,等.槭叶草对PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].北方园艺,2013,37(22):74.
　ZHANG Shuang,ZHAO Chun,DONG Ran,et al.Physiological Responses of Mukdenia rossii Under PEG-6000 Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):74.
[4]蔡喜悦,陈晓德,刘成,等.外源钙对干旱胁迫下复羽叶栾树幼苗水分及光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(10):58.
　CAI Xi-yue,CHEN Xiao-de,LIU Cheng,et al.Effect of Drought Stress with Exogenous Ca2+on Relative Water Content and the Characteristics of Photosynthesis of Koelreuteria paniculata[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):58.
[5]梁蕊芳,康利平,徐 龙,等.干旱胁迫对樱桃番茄幼苗叶片生长特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(23):12.
　LIANG Rui-fang,KANG Li-ping,XU Long,et al.Effect of Drought Stress on Growth Characteristics of Leaves in Lycopersicom esculentum var. cerasiforme Seedlings[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):12.
[6]王少平,黄超.切花菊‘黄中黄’对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].北方园艺,2013,37(15):64.
　WANG Shao-ping,HUANG Chao.Physiological Response of Cut Chrysanthemum ‘Huangzhonghuang’ to Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):64.
[7]董延龙,常缨.干旱胁迫对五种观赏蕨类植物叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(15):66.
　DONG Yan-long,CHANG Ying.Effects of Drought Stress on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Five Species of Ornamental Ferns[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):66.
[8]岳桦,石喜梅.聚乙二醇模拟干旱胁迫对兔儿伞生理特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(11):56.
　YUE Hua,SHI Xi-mei.Effects of Drought Stress Simulated by PEG-6000 on Physiological Characteristics of Syneilesis aconitifolia[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):56.
[9]余莉琳,裴宗平,孔静,等.干旱胁迫下四种矿区生态修复植物的抗旱性研究[J].北方园艺,2013,37(12):61.
　YU Li-lin,PEI Zong-ping,KONG Jing,et al.Drought Resistance of Four Plant Species in Ecological Regeneration on Mining Area Under Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):61.
[10]岳桦,张文娟.PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对并头黄芩幼苗生理特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(12):65.
　YUE Hua,ZHANG Wen-juan.Effect of Drought Stress Simulated by PEG-6000 on Physiological Characteristics of Scutellaria scordifolia F. Seedling[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):65.

备注/Memo

第一作者简介：邹原东（1980-），男，辽宁人，硕士，讲师，研究方向为植物栽培与生理生态。E-mail：zyyddd@163.com.

责任作者：石进朝（1964-），男，陕西大荔人，教授，现主要从事园林植物教学与科研工作。E-mail：shijinchao88@163.com.
基金项目：2013年北京市属高等学校人才强教深化计划-创新人才(教学名师)建设资助项目

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-08-18