[1]孙楠,秦鑫,刘杨博,等.不同长势沙枣对土壤改良效果的影响[J].北方园艺,2023,(08):63-69.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20222830]
　SUN Nan,QIN Xin,LIU Yangbo,et al.Effects of Different Growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia on Soil Improvement[J].Northern Horticulture,2023,(08):63-69.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20222830]
点击复制

不同长势沙枣对土壤改良效果的影响

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S] 卷: 期数: 2023年08 页码: 63-69 栏目: 出版日期: 2023-04-30
Title:
Effects of Different Growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia on Soil Improvement
作者:
孙楠; 秦鑫; 刘杨博; 尹伊君; 毛云飞; 沈向
（山东农业大学 园艺科学与工程学院,作物生物学国家重点实验室,山东 泰安 271018）
Author(s):
SUN Nan; QIN Xin; LIU Yangbo; YIN Yijun; MAO Yunfei; SHEN Xiang
(College of Horticulture Science and Engineering,Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology,Tai′an,Shandong 271018)
关键词:
沙枣; 盐碱土; 矿质元素; 土壤改良
Keywords:
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.; saline-alkali soil; mineral elements; soil improvement
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20222830
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以三年生沙枣(Elaeagnus angustifolia L.)为试材，根据沙枣的生长量差异，由好至差将其分为Y1、Y2、Y3 3个等级进行了田间试验，研究不同长势沙枣对土壤的改良效果的影响，以期对沙枣的推广应用提供参考依据。结果表明：沙枣可有效降低土壤pH，Y1对pH的降低效果最为显著，9月pH与7月相比降低了6.8%；3种长势沙枣土壤氮、磷、钾、铁、镁、锌等矿质元素显著高于CK，且各元素含量均为Y1＞Y2＞Y3；不同长势的沙枣提高了土壤蔗糖酶、脲酶活性，土壤酶活性均表现为Y1＞Y2＞Y3＞CK；改良微生物群落，Y1中土壤中微细菌数量显著高于CK与Y2、Y3，真菌数量显著低于CK与Y2、Y3。综上所述，沙枣可有效改良盐碱地土壤，提高土壤酶活性，改善土壤微生物群落，且沙枣长势越好，对盐碱地的改良效果越佳。
Abstract:
Taking three-year-old Elaeagnus angustifolia L.as the research material,according to the growth difference of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.,it was divided into three grades from best to bad,Y1,Y2 and Y3,the soil improvement effect of different growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. were studied,in order to provide reference for the promotion and application of Elaeagnus angustifolia L..The results showed that Elaeagnus angustifolia L. could effectively reduce the soil pH value,and Y1 had the most significant effect on the reduction of pH value.The pH value in September was 6.8% lower than that in July.The contents of mineral elements such as nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium,iron and zinc in the three growing Elaeagnus angustifolia L.soils were significantly higher than those in CK,and the contents of each element were Y1>Y2>Y3.The activities of soil sucrase and urease were increased by Elaeagnus angustifolia L.with different growth potential.The soil enzyme activities were Y1>Y2>Y3>CK.In the improved microbial community,the number of bacteria in Y1 was significantly higher than that of CK,Y2 and Y3,and the number of fungi was significantly lower than that of CK,Y2 and Y3.In conclusion,Elaeagnus angustifolia L. could effectively improve the soil quality of saline alkali land,improve soil enzyme activity and improve soil microbial community.The better the growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.,the better the improvement effect of saline alkali land.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨学涛,李品芳,侯振安,等.玛纳斯河流域不同地貌单元弃耕地土壤盐分差异研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1241-1246.[2]武海雯,杨秀艳,王计平,等.沙枣改善盐碱土壤养分的研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(11):3527-3534.[3]QADIR M,QUILLROU E,NANGIA V.Economics of salt induced land degradation and restoration[J].Natural Resources Forum：A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal,2014,38:282-295．[4]HASANUZZAMAN M,NAHAR K,ALAM M M,et al.Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils[J].BioMed Research International,2014，2014:589341.[5]关洪斌,王晓兰,冷俊昭,等.沙枣对滨海盐渍土的改良作用探究[J].资源开发与市场,2012,28(1):9-10,50.[6]陈春晓,谢秀华,王宇鹏,等.盐分和干旱对沙枣幼苗生理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4540-4550.[7]郭丽君,王玉涛.沙枣种质资源特性及利用价值[J].中国野生植物资源,2008(5):32-34.[8]杨庆山,周健,王莉莉,等.沙枣响应盐碱胁迫机制研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(2):137-141.[9]ENESCU C M.Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.)：A multipurpose species with an important role in land reclamation[J].Current Trends in Natural Sciences,2018（7）:54-60．[10]FARZAEIA M H,BAHRAMSOLTANIC R,ABBASABADIA Z,et al.Acomprehensive review on phytochemical and pharmacological asp ects of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.[J].Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology,2015,67:1467-1480．[11]SARVARIAN M,JAFARPOUR A,AWUCHI C G,et al.Changes in physicochemical,free radical activity,total phenolic and sensory properties of orange (Citrus sinensis L.) juice fortified with different oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) extracts[J].Molecules,2022,27(5):1530.[12]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[13]华菊玲,刘光荣,黄劲松.连作对芝麻根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(9)：2936-2942.[14]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.[15]赵军霞.土壤酸碱性与植物的生长[J].内蒙古农业科技,2003(6):33-34.[16]和文祥,谭向平,王旭东,等.土壤总体酶活性指标的初步研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1232-1236.[17]刘业萍,毛云飞,胡艳丽,等.苹果园生草对土壤微生物多样性、酶活性及碳组分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(10):1792-1805.[18]张晓芹,李国庆,杜盛.未来气候变化对沙枣适宜分布区的影响预测[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3213-3220.[19]王慧,解文斌,刘宁,等.基于栽植沙枣的晋北盐碱地土壤改良处理组合研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):281-287.[20]SHAO T Y,GU X Y,ZHU T S,et al.Industrial crop Jerusalem artichoke restored coastal saline soil quality by reducing salt and increasing diversity of bacterial community[J].Appl.Soil Ecol,2019,138:195-206.[21]LIU M L,WANG C,LIU X L,et al.Saline-alkali soil applied with vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer improved macroaggregate microstructure to enhance salt leaching and inhibit nitrogen losses[J].Appl Soil Ecol,2020,156:103705.[22]ZHANG C,ZHOU X H,WANG X Y,et al.Elaeagnus angustifolia can improve salt-alkali soil and the health level of soil：Emphasizing the driving role of core microbial communities[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,305:114401.[23]代金霞,田平雅,张莹,等.银北盐渍化土壤中6种耐盐植物根际细菌群落结构及其多样性[J].生态学报,2019,39(8):2705-2714.[24]尹伊君,毛云飞,杨露,等.增氧灌溉对平邑甜茶生长及根区土壤的影响[J].林业科学,2021,57(10):59-70.[25]张翠萍,孟平,李建中,等.磷元素和土壤酸化交互作用对核桃幼苗光合特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(12):1345-1355.[26]林万树,沈金泉,黄功标,等.果园土壤中、微量元素含量及其与pH值有机质含量的关系[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(5):77-80.[27]蔡凯,高维常,潘文杰,等.贵州烟田土壤pH、交换性钙镁和CaCO3含量分布特征及其相互关系[J].土壤通报,2022,53(3):532-539.[28]吴玉森,张艳敏,冀晓昊,等.自然生草对黄河三角洲梨园土壤养分、酶活性及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(1):99-108.[29]NING X L,WANG X H,GUAN Z Y,et al.Effects of different patterns of maize-straw application on soil microorganisms,enzyme activities,and grain yield[J].Bioengineered,2021,12(1):3684-3698.[30]DANIEL G,BRUCE A L,PATRICIA A L.Effect of fertilization on soil microorganisms in paddy rice systems：A meta-analysis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,115:452-460．[31]闵红,和文祥,李晓明,等.黄土丘陵区植被恢复过程中土壤微生物数量演变特征[J].西北植物学报,2007(3):588-593.[32]薛立,邝立刚,陈红跃,等.不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J].土壤学报,2003(2):280-285.[33]李亮,包耀贤,廖超英,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北部沙区人工林土壤微生物及酶活性研究[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(5):987-994.[34]胡亚林,汪思龙,颜绍馗.影响土壤微生物活性与群落结构因素研究进展[J].土壤通报,2006(1):170-176.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 妮 妮,杨 立 柱,李 忠 武,等.盘锦地区沙枣硬枝扦插试验[J].北方园艺,2010,34(06):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201006044]
　W ANG Ni -ni,YANG Li -zhu,LI Zhong-wu,et al.Preliminary Experiment of Seedling Cultivation by Hardwood Cutting on ElaeagnusAngustifolia L. in Area of Panjin[J].Northern Horticulture,2010,34(08):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201006044]
[2]桂毓,杨静慧,刘艳军,等.盐碱土对不同樱桃品种生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2016,40(13):33.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201613009]
　GUI Yu,YANG Jinghui,LIU Yanjun,et al.Effect of Saline-alkali Soil on the Growth of Different Varieties of Cherry[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(08):33.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201613009]
[3]张桂霞,李树玲.盐胁迫对两种沙枣抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺,2011,35(10):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.2011010016]
　ZHANG Gui-xia,LI Shu-ling.Effects of Salt Stress on Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes of Two Kinds of Elaeagnus angusti f olia L. Seedlings[J].Northern Horticulture,2011,35(08):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.2011010016]
[4]聂小兰.沙枣的研究现状及展望[J].北方园艺,2007,31(04):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.200704027]
　[J].Northern Horticulture,2007,31(08):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.200704027]
[5]徐金,于文章,倪伟,等.沙枣种质资源表型性状与果实品质多样性[J].北方园艺,2016,40(22):20.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201622005]
　XU Jin,YU Wenzhang,NI Wei,et al.Diversity of Phenotypic Traits and Fruit Quality of Elaeagnus Germplasm Resources[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(08):20.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201622005]
[6]高昕,索全义,王瑞清,等.生物有机型盐碱土调理剂对土壤化学性质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018,42(10):103.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20172932]
　GAO Xin,SUO Quanyi,WANG Ruiqing,et al.Effect of Bio-organic Saline-alkali Conditioner on Soil Chemical Properties[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(08):103.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20172932]
[7]李朝阳,张强伟,王兴鹏.埋设深度对微润灌土壤水盐运移的影响[J].北方园艺,2018,42(14):118.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174064]
　LI Zhaoyang,ZHANG Qiangwei,WANG Xingpeng.Effect of Different Buried Depth on Soil Water and Salt Movement During Moistube-irrigation[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(08):118.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174064]
[8]范义昌,柴珊珊,张曼曼,等.宁夏沙枣种质资源表型多样性分析[J].北方园艺,2018,42(23):37.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20181511]
　FAN Yichang,CHAI Shanshan,ZHANG Manman,et al.Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Elaeagnus angustifolia Resources From Ningxia[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(08):37.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20181511]
[9]陈智坤,冯璞阳,井光花,等.不同改良措施对关中典型设施盐碱土质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2020,44(20):83.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20200003]
　CHEN Zhikun,FENG Puyang,JING Guanghua,et al.Effects of Different Improvement Measures on Quality of Typical Saline-alkali Soil With Plastic Shed in the Middle of Shaanxi[J].Northern Horticulture,2020,44(08):83.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20200003]
[10]孟和那仁,包翔,王明玖.不同治理措施对盐碱土团聚体组成和碳氮的影响[J].北方园艺,2021,(12):88.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20204484]
　Monknaren,BAO Xiang,WANG Mingjiu.Effects of Different Treatment Measures on the Composition and Carbon and Nitrogen of Saline-alkali Soil Aggregates[J].Northern Horticulture,2021,(08):88.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20204484]

备注/Memo

第一作者简介：孙楠（1997-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为果树生理。E-mail:3189474755@qq.com.责任作者：沈向（1966-），男，博士，教授，博士生导师，现主要从事观赏果树等研究工作。E-mail：shenx@sdau.edu.cn.基金项目：山东省良种工程资助项目（2017LZN024）；山东省果品体系资助项目（SDAIT-06-07）；国家公益性行业科技资助项目（201303093）。收稿日期：2022-07-07

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-12