MIAO Fan,YANG Xinguo,GU Junlong,et al.Effects of Enclosure on Soil Particle Composition and Nutrient Enrichment of Stipa breviflora[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(09):98-105.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20182896]
围封对短花针茅植丛土壤颗粒组成和养分富集的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Enclosure on Soil Particle Composition and Nutrient Enrichment of Stipa breviflora
- Keywords:
- Stipa breviflora; enclosure; particle composition; SOC and TN; enrichment effect
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以一体化土壤采集器为试材，采用植丛内外差值百分比法，以围封退化短花针茅草地为研究对象，临近自由放牧草地为对照（CK），对比研究了荒漠草原短花针茅植丛对土壤颗粒组成和SOC和TN的富集效应在空间上的变化，以期探讨植丛对土壤富集作用的影响。结果表明：就富集率“E”值而言，粘粒（<2 μm）和砂粒（50～2 000 μm）的富集格局大致趋势相反，生境和土层深度对粉粒（2～500 μm）的富集均无显著影响（P＞0.05）。SOC在6~8 cm土层放牧区显著高于围封区，12~14 cm土层围封区显著高于放牧区；TN则在4~6 cm土层围封区显著高于放牧区，12~14 cm土层放牧区显著高于围封区（P<0.05）。沿土层深度垂直变化，颗粒组成仅放牧区砂粒在12~14 cm土层“E”值显著增高（P＞0.05）；SOC围封区0~2 cm土层“E”值显著高于其它土层（P<0.05），TN放牧区呈先减少后增高“V”型变化，4~8 cm土层“E”值显著降低（P<0.05），放牧区的SOC和围封区的TN都无显著变化（P＞0.05）。粘粒与砂粒的“E”值均呈显著负相关（P<0.05），粉粒与粘粒、粉粒与砂粒的“E”值相关关系逆转；颗粒组成与SOC、TN的“E”值相关性都不显著（P＞0.05）。总之，围封并未使短花针茅植丛对土壤粘粒的整体富集率增大，反而有所降低；但围封确推动了土壤粘粒和SOC表聚型富集；土壤SOC和TN的富集是2个独立的过程，围封都有利于任意土层TN的富集。
- Abstract:
- The integrated soil collector was used as the experimental material,and the percentage difference method inside and outside the plant was adopted.The enclosure of degraded Stipa breviflora was studied,and the free grazing grassland was used as the control.The spatial variation of soil particle composition and SOC and TN enrichment effects in the desert steppe was studied.In order to answer the impact of planting on soil enrichment.The results showed that in terms of the enrichment rate ‘E’ value.The enrichment pattern of clay (<2 μm) and sand (50-2 000 μm) was roughly opposite,and habitat and soil depth have no significant effect on the enrichment of silt (2-500 μm) (P>0.05).SOC in the 6-8 cm soil layer grazing area was significantly higher than the enclosed area（P<0.05）,the 12-14 cm soil layer enclosing area was significantly higher than the grazing area (P>0.05)；TN was significantly higher in the enclosed area of 4-6 cm soil than in the grazing area（P<0.05）,the grazing area of the 12-14 cm soil layer was significantly higher than the enclosed area (P>0.05).Vertical variation along the depth of the soil layer,particle composition only in the grazing area sand ‘E’ value in the 12-14 cm soil layer was significantly increased（P＞0.05）.The ‘E’ value of the 0-2 cm soil layer in the SOC enclosure was significantly higher than that in other soil layers (P<0.05),the TN grazing area was reduced first and then the ‘V’ type was increased,and the ‘E’ value of the 4-8 cm soil layer is significantly reduced (P<0.05),there was no significant change in the SOC of the grazing area and the TN of the enclosed area (P>0.05).There was a significant negative correlation between the ‘E’ values of caly and sand (P<0.05),and the correlation between the ‘E’ values of the silt and clay,silt and sand was reversed;the composition of the particles and the ‘E’ value of the SOC,TN correlation was not significant (P>0.05).In short，enclosure did not increase the overall enrichment rate of soil clay by the short stalk,but encapsulation did promote soil cohesive and SOC surface enrichment;soil SOC and TN enrichment was two independent processes,and the enclosing was beneficial to the enrichment of TN in any soil layer.
参考文献/References:
[1]van MIEGROET H,HYSELL M T,JOHNSON A D.Soil microclimate and chemistry of spruce-fir tree islands in northern Utah[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2000,64:1515-1525.[2]彭海英,李小雁,童绍玉.干旱半干旱区草原灌丛化研究进展[J].草业学报,2014,23(2):313-322.[3]瞿王龙,杨小鹏,张存涛,等.干旱、半干旱地区天然草原灌木及其肥岛效应研究进展[J].草业学报,2015,24(4):201-207.[4]张生楹,任彦文,柳小妮,等.高寒牧区醉马草草丛肥岛效应的研究[J].中国草地学报,2013,35(1):85-90.[5]李学斌,陈林,樊瑞霞,等.围封条件下荒漠草原4种典型植物群落枯落物输入对土壤理化性质的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2015,41(1):101-110.[6]翟夏杰,黄顶,王堃.围封与放牧对典型草原植被和土壤的影响[J].中国草地学报,2015,37(6):73-78.[7]BOEKEN B,ORENSTEIN D.The effect of piant litter on eco-systcm properties in a Mediterranean semi-arid shrub-land[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2011,12(6):825-832[8]陈越.不同放牧制度对短花针茅草原群落特征和土壤的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.[9]方精云,王襄平,沈泽昊,等.植物群落清查的主要内容、方法和技术规范[J].生物多样性,2009,17(6):533-548[10]刘学东,陈林,杨新国,等.荒漠草原2种柠条(Caragana korshinskii)和油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)灌丛土壤养分“肥岛”效应[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(4):26-32,92.[11]侯扶江,任继周.甘肃马鹿冬季放牧践踏作用及其对土壤理化性质影响的评价[J].生态学报,2003(3):486-495.[12]李雅琼.围封禁牧对小针茅草原群落和土壤的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2017.[13]宋乃平,吴旭东,潘军,等.荒漠草原人工柠条林对土壤质地演进过程的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2015,41(6):703-711.[14]韩惠芳,宁堂原,李增嘉,等.保护性耕作和杂草管理对冬小麦农田土壤水分及有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(5):1183-1188.[15]郁珊珊,王浩,王亚军.南京市不同园林植物根际土壤养分和重金属富集特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):120-127.[16]郭二辉,孙然好,陈利顶,等.河岸带不同植被类型对土壤有机碳和全氮分布特征的影响:以北京地区温榆河为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(10):1315-1321.
相似文献/References:
[1]王颖,崔向新,金娟,等.围栏封育对典型草原土壤特征的影响[J].北方园艺,2015,39(10):155.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201510039]
WANG Ying,CUI Xiang-xin,JIN Juan,et al.Effect of Enclosed and Grazing Prohibition on Typical Steppe Soil Properties[J].Northern Horticulture,2015,39(09):155.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201510039]
[2]张义凡,陈林,杨新国,等.围封与放牧对荒漠草原土壤理化性质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017,41(01):171.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201701038]
ZHANG Yifan,CHEN Lin,YANG Xinguo,et al.Effects of Grazing and Fencing on Soil Physicochemical Properties in Desert Grassland[J].Northern Horticulture,2017,41(09):171.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201701038]
[3]王静,自红州,李黄维,等.盐胁迫对短花针茅幼苗生长及抗氧化同工酶的影响[J].北方园艺,2018,42(14):109.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174088]
WANG Jing,ZI Hongzhou,LI Huangwei,et al.Effects of Salt Stress on Stipa breviflora Seedling and Antioxidant Isozyme[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(09):109.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174088]
[4]王静,自红州,李黄维,等.盐胁迫对短花针茅幼苗生长及抗氧化同工酶的影响[J].北方园艺,2018,42(14):77.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174088]
WANG Jing,ZI Hongzhou,LI Huangwei,et al.Effects of Salt Stress on Stipa breviflora Seedling and Antioxidant Isozyme[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(09):77.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20174088]
[5]靳长青,李国旗,赵盼盼,等.围封对苦豆子群落多样性及土壤微生物的影响[J].北方园艺,2019,43(02):1.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20181722]
JIN Changqing,LI Guoqi,ZHAO Panpan,et al.Effect of Enclosure on Diversity and Soil Microbial of Sophora alopecuroides Community[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(09):1.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20181722]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：苗翻（1990-），女，陕西子洲人，硕士研究生，研究方向为旱区生态恢复过程与机理。E-mail：940271384@qq.com.责任作者：杨新国（1976-），男，山东肥城人，博士，副研究员，现主要从事旱区生态水文学与生态恢复等研究工作。E-mail：xinguoyang1976@163.com.基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目（31460161）；宁夏大学西部一流学科建设资助项目（NXYLXK2017B06）；宁夏大学西部一流大学建设资助项目（GZXM2017001）。收稿日期：2018-10-08