ZHAO Yuan,WANG Shiyao,ZHANG Guo,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation of Biological Characters of Phalaenopsis Germplasm Resources[J].Northern Horticulture,2024,(1):54-59.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20232537]
蝴蝶兰种质资源生物学性状综合评价
- Title:
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Biological Characters of Phalaenopsis Germplasm Resources
- 文章编号:
- 1001-0009(2024)01-0054-06
- 关键词:
- 蝴蝶兰; 种质资源; 生物学性状; 层次分析法; K-Means聚类分析法
- Keywords:
- Phalaenopsis; germplasm resources; biological character; AHP; K-Means clustering analysis method
- 分类号:
- S 682.31
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以收集的57份蝴蝶兰种质资源为研究对象，对其23个生物学性状进行调查并分析，明确影响蝴蝶兰种质资源生物学性状综合评价的主要因子，采用层次分析法与K-Means聚类分析方法相结合，建立蝴蝶兰种质资源生物学性状综合评价体系，以期能够较为全面的评价现有种质，对现有种质资源进行分级，为蝴蝶兰种质资源的利用、新品种选育及栽培推广提供参考依据。结果表明：花部形态（C1）是蝴蝶兰综合性状评价的主要因子，花色所占比重最大，花梗形态（C2）次之，植株形态（C3）权重最低；综合评价得分最高的是‘光芒四射’（得分4.270 6）；花部形态评价得分最高的是‘招财猫’和‘光芒四射’（得分2.501 0），植株形态得分最高的是‘龙树枫叶’（得分0.747 2），花梗形态得分最高的是‘1713’（得分1.155 4）；根据评价得分将57份种质分为4个等级，其中优秀等级9个，占比15.79%；良好18个，占比31.58%；中等20个，占比35.09%；及格10个，占比17.54%。
- Abstract:
- With 57 Phalaenopsis germplasm resources collected as research objects，23 biological traits were investigated and analyzed to clarify the main factors affecting the comprehensive evaluation of the biological traits of Phalaenopsis germplasm resources，and the hierarchical analysis method was combined with the K-Means clustering analysis to establish a comprehensive evaluation system of the biological traits of Phalaenopsis germplasm resources，so as to be able to evaluate the existing germplasm comprehensively and classify existing germplasm resources for reference in the utilization，selection and breeding of new varieties and cultivation promotion of Phalaenopsis.This system was intended to evaluate the existing germplasm in a more comprehensive way，to classify the existing germplasm resources，and to provide reference for the utilization of Phalaenopsis germplasm resources，the selection and breeding of new varieties，and the promotion of cultivation.The results showed that floral morphology (C1) was the main factor in the comprehensive trait evaluation of Phalaenopsis，flower color accounted for the largest proportion，pedicel morphology (C2) was the second largest，and plant morphology (C3) was the least weighted；the highest score in the comprehensive evaluation was ‘Guangmangsishe’ (score 4.270 6)；the highest scores in the evaluation of floral morphology were ‘Fortune Cat’ and ‘Guangmangsishe’ (score 2.501)，the highest scoring plant form was ‘Longshufengye’ (score 0.747 2)，and the highest scoring pedicel form was ‘1713’ (score 1.155 4)；57 germplasm were categorized into 4 grades based on the evaluation scores，including 9 excellent grades，accounting for 15.79%；18 good grades，accounting for 31.58%；20 medium grades，accounting for 35.09%；and 10 passing grades，accounting for 17.54%.
参考文献/References:
［1］薛光卿.蝴蝶兰市场潜力旺,从业者信心足［N］.中国花卉报，2023-1-12(3).［2］陈剑锋，钟声远，陈宇华，等.基于花表型性状的蝴蝶兰品种资源多样性研究［J］.热带作物学报，2023，44(3)：494-505.［3］陈和明，吕复兵，李佐,等.蝴蝶兰品质性状综合评价体系的构建［J］.中国农业大学学报，2017，22(8)：83-94.［4］宋一岚，张英杰，孙纪霞，等.蝴蝶兰70份资源观赏性状综合评价［J］.热带作物学报，2020，41(1)：43-48.［5］SARI B，SEN T，KILIC S E.AHP model for the selection of partner companies in virtual enterprises［J］.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology，2008，38(3/4)：367-376.［6］张亚琼,张伟,戴思兰，等.基于AHP的中国传统盆栽菊花产业花品种筛选［J］.中国农业科学，2011，44(21)：4438-4446.［7］卢学礼，刘凤君，李军,等.重瓣型子莲品种的综合评价与筛选［J］.植物资源与环境学报，2022，31(3)：93-100.［8］贾晓丽，陈忠萍，吴圆圆，等.15种大花月季在北疆地区的观赏特性综合评价［J］.江苏农业科学，2020，48(15)：182-186.［9］司宝华，罗建让，张延龙.基于专用目标的紫斑牡丹单株评价与筛选［J］.北方园艺，2023(10)：65-73.［10］艾叶，陈璐，兰思仁，等.基于层次分析法的建兰品种观赏价值综合评价［J］.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版)，2019，48(6)：736-741.［11］宋敏,余萍,张慧会等.基于AHP的北京市银杏单株观赏价值评价［J］.北方园艺，2021(22)：90-97.［12］苏梓莹,李斓,张茜莹,等.广东省特有兰科植物观赏性状综合评价［J］.热带作物学报，2020，41(8)：1560-1565.［13］王世尧，杨书才，蒋栓丽，等.蝴蝶兰响应低温胁迫研究进展［J］.北方园艺，2023(4)：124-131.
相似文献/References:
[1]孙汝斌,余 纽,孙佩光.蝴蝶兰基因工程研究进展[J].北方园艺,2014,38(12):177.
SUN Ru-bin,YU Niu,SUN Pei-guang.Research Progress on Gene Engineering of Phalaenopsis Plants[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):177.
[2]但 忠,苏银玲,木万福,等.欧洲型黄瓜耐热性综合评价及耐热种质的筛选[J].北方园艺,2013,37(22):49.
DAN Zhong,SU Yin-ling,MU Wan-fu,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Heat Tolerant Germplasm in Europe-type Cucumber[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(1):49.
[3]杨婷婷,夏乐晗,于泽群,等.君迁子种质资源若干问题的研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(10):184.
YANG Ting-ting,XIA Le-han,YU Ze-qun,et al.Discussion of Several Issues of Diospyros lotus L. Germplasm Resources[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):184.
[4]董平,赵培宝,任爱芝.蝴蝶兰灰霉病菌的分离鉴定[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):109.
DONG Ping,ZHAO Pei-bao,REN Ai-zhi.Isolation and Identification of Botrytis cinerea?in Phalaenopsis[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):109.
[5]张占江,李翠,韦莹,等.珍稀濒危药用植物弄岗唇柱苣苔离体保存研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):136.
ZHANG Zhan-jiang,LI Cui,WEI Ying,et al.In vitro Conservation Technique of Rave or Endangered Germplasm in Chirita longgangensis W.T.Wang in Guihaia[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):136.
[6]张正海,张悦,赵伟伟,等.北五味子种质资源调查与分析[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):185.
ZHANG Zheng-hai,ZHANG Yue,ZHAO Wei-wei,et al.Investigation and Analysis of Germplasm Resources of ?Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill.[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(1):185.
[7]王常芸,李晓亮,张京伟,等.蝴蝶兰组培快繁技术体系研究[J].北方园艺,2013,37(15):122.
WANG Chang-yun,LI Xiao-liang,ZHANG Jing-wei,et al.Study on Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation System of Phalaenopsis[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(1):122.
[8]张建英,毛向红,张莹莹.核桃种质资源遗传多样性的RAMP标记分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(09):106.
ZHANG Jian-ying,MAO Xiang-hong,ZHANG Ying-ying.Study on the Genetic Diversity of Walnut Germplasm Resources Based on RAMP Marker[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):106.
[9]张东旭,敖 妍,马履一.山西省文冠果的栽培历史及研究现状[J].北方园艺,2014,38(09):192.
ZHANG Dong-xu,AO Yan,MA Lv-yi.The Research of Current Situation and Cultivation History of Xanthoceras sorbifolia in Shanxi Province[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):192.
[10]伍壮生,王 敏,吴月燕.海南省栽培的淮山种质资源聚类分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(03):14.
WU Zhuang-sheng,WANG Min,WU Yue-yan.Cluster Analysis of Cutivated Chinese Yam Germplasm Resources in Hainan Province[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(1):14.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：赵玉安（1978-），男，本科，副研究员，现主要从事花卉栽培与育种等研究工作。E-mail：896194451@qq.com.基金项目：河南省重点研发与推广专项资助项目（科技攻关）（232102111101）；河南省林木种质资源建设资助项目（豫财环资［2023］60号）。收稿日期：2023-07-27