WANG Feiyan,LI Yushan,HE Wei,et al.Multivariate Statistical Analysis on Agronomic Traits of Fresh Tomato in Xinjiang[J].Northern Horticulture,2022,(15):1-9.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20220337]
新疆鲜食番茄农艺性状的多元统计分析
- Title:
- Multivariate Statistical Analysis on Agronomic Traits of Fresh Tomato in Xinjiang
- Keywords:
- fresh tomato; agronomic traits; multivariate statistical analysis; comprehensive evaluation
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以30份无限生长型鲜食番茄品种为试材，采用遗传多样性分析、相关分析、隶属函数及主成分分析等方法，研究了不同性状指标对鲜食番茄生长的影响，进而对鲜食番茄品种进行系统评价，以期筛选出适宜新疆生产的优良品种。结果表明：1）各品种16个农艺性状的遗传多样性指数分布范围在1.21～1.74，平均变异系数为11.60%，其中单株产量的变异系数最大(18%)，株高的变异系数最小（7%）；2）采用隶属函数法对各品种果实的营养成分进行分析，其中“大同红番茄”的平均隶属函数值最高、营养品质最好；3）基于主成分分析构建综合评价模型，对供试材料的数量性状及营养品质性状进行综合评价，其综合得分在0～1范围内的品种有15个；其中“哈密黄柿子”“桔黄佳辰”“香妃7号”“金萍”“秃尖粉”，适宜在新疆乌鲁木齐当地推广种植。
- Abstract:
- Taking 30 varieties of unlimited growing fresh tomato as test materials,and the methods of genetic diversity analysis,correlation analysis,membership function and principal component analysis were used.The effects of different character indexes on the growth of fresh tomato were studied to systematically evaluate the fresh tomato varieties,in order to screen out the good varieties suitable for Xinjiang production.The results showed that,1)the genetic diversity index of 16 agronomic traits of each variety ranged from 1.21 to 1.74,and the average coefficient of variation was 11.60%.The coefficient of variation of yield per plant was the highest (18%),and the coefficient of variation of plant height was the lowest (7%).2)The average membership function value of ‘Datong Red Tomato’was the highest and the nutritional quality was the best.3)A comprehensive evaluation model was established based on principal component analysis to comprehensively evaluate the quantitative traits and nutritional quality traits of the tested materials,and the comprehensive score of 15 varieties was within the range of 0-1.Among them,‘Hami Yellow Persimmon’‘Orange Yellow Jiachen’‘Xiangfei No.7’‘Jin Ping’ and ‘Tu Jianfen’ were suitable for planting in Xinjiang.
参考文献/References:
[1]李洪磊,王晓敏,郑福顺,等.基于主成分和隶属函数分析的不同果色番茄品种引种初步评价[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(2):402-411.[2]李君明,项朝阳,王孝宣,等.“十三五”我国番茄产业现状及展望[J].中国蔬菜,2021(2):13-20.[3]李艳红,聂俊,郑锦荣,等.华南地区樱桃番茄表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J].园艺学报,2021,48(9):1717-1730.[4]李胜奇,李立国,王教义.番茄新品种的引种与筛选评价[J].中国农业信息,2017,12(10):71-74.[5]布卡? 欧尔娜,宋梅,黄敏,等.新疆奎屯垦区樱桃番茄品种初步筛选及评价[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(17):129-133．[6]王晓静,梁燕,徐加新,等.番茄品质性状的多元统计分析[J].西北农业学报,2010,19(9):103-108.[7]李勋兰,洪林,杨蕾,等.11个柑橘品种果实营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J].食品科学,2020,41(8):228-233.[8]张雨晴,斯琴格日勒,翟蓉,等.野生欧李和栽培欧李果实营养成分的比较分析[J].食品研究与开发,2017,38(8):104-108．[9]邓世荣,马春梅,郑兴国.新疆大果沙棘果实营养成分分析研究[J]．现代农业科技,2019(22):177-179．[10]吕鑫,侯丽霞,张晓明,等.番茄果实成熟过程中番茄红素含量的变化[J].中国蔬菜,2009(6):21-24.[11]王源秀,何佳佳,方丹,等.常见果蔬VC含量测定方法筛选研究[J].安徽农学通报,2015,21(18):20-22.[12]吴欣明,郭璞,池惠武,等.国外紫花苜蓿种质资源表型性状与品质多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(1):103-111.[13]赵孟良,韩睿,王紫莹,等.20份小白菜品种引种试验农艺性状的多样性分析[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(8):1960-1969.[14]徐义康,高飞,施柳.利用隶属函数法综合评价8个大白菜品种性状[J].浙江农林大学学报,2018,35(5):64-71.[15]高源,王霞,高树仁,等.基于隶属函数法分析80份玉米自交系萌芽期的抗旱性[J/OL].分子植物育种,（2021-09-28）[2021-12-03].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210927.2137.006.html.[16]马洪英,张远芳,张晓磊,等.运用隶属函数综合评价七份番茄种质资源[J].北方园艺,2011(1):13-15.[17]潘存祥,许勇,纪海波,等.西瓜种质资源表型多样性及聚类分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2015,16(1):59-63.[18]王海平,李锡香,沈镝,等基于表型性状的中国大蒜资源遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(1):24-31.[19]张静,常培培,梁燕,等.樱桃番茄主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价[J].北方园艺,2014(21):1-7.[20]张钟炎,胡鲁巍,陈加威,等.矮生观赏番茄种质资源农艺性状鉴定及观赏性评价[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2021，47（2）:158-170.[21]韩泽群,姜波.加工番茄品种多性状综合评价方法研究[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(2):357-365.
相似文献/References:
[1]王 亮,李 艳,刘志刚,等.新疆加工番茄农艺性状的相关性及主成分分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(13):20.
WANG Liang,LI Yan,LIU Zhi-gang,et al.Correlation and Principal Component Analysis Between Major Agronomic Traits of Processing Tomato in Xinjiang[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(15):20.
[2]祁连弟,管建慧,其日格,等.不同比例牛羊粪便栽培基质对温室番茄苗期生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(22):47.
QI Lian-di,GUAN Jian-hui,QI Ri-ge,et al.Effects of Different Nursery Substrates with Cow and Sheep Dung on the Seedlings Growth of Tomato in Solar Greenhouse[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(15):47.
[3]黄 亮,杨丽维,班立桐,等.环境因子对蟹味菇农艺性状的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(02):141.
HUANG Liang,YANG Li-wei,BAN Li-tong,et al.Effect of Environmental Factors on Agronomic Characters of Pleurotus eryngii [J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(15):141.
[4]张俊花,刘灵娣,黄伟,等.冀西北坝上地区洋葱引种试验[J].北方园艺,2013,37(11):39.
ZHANG Jun-hua,LIU Ling-di,HUANG Wei,et al.Introduction Experiment of Onion Varieties in the Northwest of Hebei Province[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(15):39.
[5]闫 宁,陈 刚.生物有机肥对日光温室黄瓜农艺性状和经济效益的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(03):30.
YAN Ning,CHEN Gang.Effect of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Agronomic Characters and Economic Benefits of Cucumber in Solar Greenhouse[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(15):30.
[6]严海欧,鲁富宽,杨忠仁.保护地鲜食番茄品种比较试验[J].北方园艺,2012,36(03):45.
YAN Hai-ou,LU Fu-kuan,YANG Zhong-ren.The Comparative Test of Fresh-eating Tomato Variety in Solar-greenhouse[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(15):45.
[7]刘子记,刘昭华,牛玉,等.不同苦瓜材料农艺性状调查及白粉病抗性分析[J].北方园艺,2013,37(19):117.
LIU Zi-ji,LIU Zhao-hua,NIU Yu,et al.Agronomic Traits Investigation and Powdery Mildew Resistance Evaluation of Bitter Gourd Germplasm[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(15):117.
[8]任喜波,高金远,戴希尧,等.早熟甘蓝主要农艺性状的综合评价[J].北方园艺,2012,36(17):44.
REN Xi-bo,GAO Jin-Yuan,Dai Xi-yao,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Characters in Early Maturity Cabbage[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(15):44.
[9]单成海.洋葱品种农艺性状相关性及灰色关联度分析[J].北方园艺,2013,37(02):25.
SHAN Cheng-hai.Analysis on Correlation and Grey Correlative Degree of Onion Agronomic Traits[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(15):25.
[10]张灵凤,宋江华,汪承刚,等.江淮地区乌塌菜品种比较试验[J].北方园艺,2012,36(24):34.
ZHANG Ling-feng,SONG Jiang-hua,WANG Cheng-gang,et al.Comparative Test of Savoy Varieties in Changjiang and Huaihe River Basin[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(15):34.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：王飞燕（1996-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为蔬菜学。E-mail：627668237@qq.com.责任作者：宋羽（1980-），男，博士，研究员，现主要从事设施园艺等研究工作。E-mail:songyu150@163.com.基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目（31960622）；新疆农业科学院青年科技骨干创新能力培养基金资助项目（xjnkq-2021013）；自治区科技特派员农村科技创业行动资助项目（2022KZ001）。收稿日期：2022-01-25