GAO Pi-sheng,ZHANG Ping,ZHU Zhi-qiang.Study on Comparison of Different Preservatives in the ‘Zaoheibao’ Grape Storage[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):116-119.
不同保鲜剂对“早黑宝”葡萄贮藏保鲜的效果比较
- Title:
- Study on Comparison of Different Preservatives in the ‘Zaoheibao’ Grape Storage
- 文章编号:
- 1001-0009(2013)02-0116-04
- Keywords:
- ‘Zaoheibao’ grape; different preservatives; fresh-keeping
- 分类号:
- S 663.109+3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以“早黑宝”葡萄为试材，在0℃条件下贮藏,研究比较了8种保鲜剂对“早黑宝”葡萄果实品质指标、呼吸强度、可溶性固形物、维生素C含量、可滴定酸含量、丙二醛含量的影响。结果表明：5CT2+2CT5组合保鲜效果明显优于其它保鲜剂，可做为“早黑宝”葡萄的最适保鲜剂。该组合下，建议贮藏时间为60 d以内。
- Abstract:
- Taking ‘Zaoheibao’ grape as material,the effect of 8 preservatives on the fruit quality index,respiration intensity,soluble solids,VC content,titratable acid content,malondialdehyde content of ‘Zaoheibao’ grape stored at 0℃ were studied.The results showed the 5CT2+2CT5 was obviously superior to other preservatives，screening for the most suitable preservative of the ‘Zaoheibao’ grape.In this combination，recommended to store 60 days or less.
参考文献/References:
[1]何家慧.葡萄新品种早黑宝[J].西北园艺,2003(3):36-37. [2]刘喜宏,刘拴梅.极早熟葡萄早黑宝引种观察及早丰技术[J].河北果树,2004(5):23-24. [3]唐晓萍,陈俊,马小河,等.葡萄新品种早黑宝的倍性结构鉴定[J].果树学报,2006,23(3):384-387. [4]陈俊,唐晓萍,李登科,等.四倍体葡萄新品种早黑宝[J].山西果树,2001(4):3-4. [5]王翠萍,张旭晨,边小虎,等.早黑宝葡萄丰产栽培试验[J].中国果树,2005(6):40-41. [6]中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 12456-2008食品中总酸的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008. [7]李军.钼蓝比色法测定还原型维生素C[J].食品科学,2000,21(8):42-45. [8]李合生,孙群,赵世杰,等.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003:260-261. [9]周会玲.葡萄果实耐贮性的比较生物学[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2006. [10]Sholberg P L,Reynolds A G,Gaunce A P,et al.Fumigation of table grapes with acetic acid to prevent post-harvest decay[J].Plant Disease,1996,80(12):1425-1428. [11]Combrink J C,Truter A B.The control of postharvest decay of table grapes[J].The Deciduous Fruit Grower,1979,29(8):272-283. [12]李桂峰.可食性膜对鲜切葡萄生理生化及保鲜效果影响的研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2005.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：高丕生（1986-），男，在读硕士，现主要从事农产品低温物流及保鲜等研究工作。E-mail:gaosheng8609@126.com.