YU Yong-chang,ZHANG Lin,WANG Hou-xin,et al.Comparison on Photosynthetic Characteritics of Three Acer mono Maxim.Varieties[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):57-60.
三个五角枫品种光合特性比较
- Title:
- Comparison on Photosynthetic Characteritics of Three Acer mono Maxim.Varieties
- 文章编号:
- 1001-0009（2013）02-0057-04
- 分类号:
- S 687.9
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以“泰山天外村1号”、“泰山京福1号”、“泰山京福2号”3个五角枫品种的2 a生扦插苗为试材，采用英国PP-Systems公司产CIRAS-1型便携式光合系统，研究比较了3个五角枫品种的光合生理参数及其变化规律。结果表明：不同五角枫品种的叶片净光合速率(Pn)日变化都呈单峰型曲线，净光合速率间差异显著。光饱和点(LSP)为“泰山京福1号”（1 291.67 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山天外村1号”（1 257.14 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山京福2号”（1 235.71 μmol·m-2·s-1），光补偿点(LCP)为“泰山天外村1号”（105.15 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山京福1号”（93.46 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山京福2号”（71.50 μmol·m-2·s-1），表观光合量子效率(AQY)为“泰山天外村1号”（光量子0.0155 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山京福1号”（光量子0.0127 μmol·m-2·s-1）>“泰山京福2号”（光量子0.0111 μmol·m-2·s-1）；CO2饱和点(CSP)为“泰山京福1号”（1 271.43 μmol/mol）>“泰山天外村1号”（1 150 μmol/mol）>“泰山京福2号”（1 137.5 μmol/mol），CO2补偿点(CCP)为“泰山京福2号”（153.03 μmol/mol）>“泰山天外村1号”（149.08 μmol/mol）>“泰山京福1号”（129.33 μmol/mol），羧化效率(CE)为“泰山京福2号”（0.0195）>“泰山天外村1号”（0.0186）>“泰山京福1号”（0.0169）；单位质量叶绿素含量为“泰山京福1号”>“泰山天外村1号”>“泰山京福2号”。3个五角枫品种光合作用强弱依次为“泰山京福1号”>“泰山天外村1号”>“泰山京福2号”。
- Abstract:
- Taking ‘Taishanjingfu No.1’，‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ and ‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ three 2-year-old Acer mono Maxim.varieties of cutting seedlings as test materials,using CIRAS-1 portable photosynthesis system，the various photosynthetic physiological parameters and their variation regularities in three Acer mono Maxim.varieties were compared and studied.The results showed that both the diurnal change of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of three Acer mono Maxim.varieties showed a single-peak curve and the net photosynthetic rate had significant difference between three Acer mono Maxim.varieties.Light saturation point (LSP) of the three Acer mono Maxim.varieties was ‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (1 291.67 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (1 257.14 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (1 235.71 μmol·m-2·s-1)，the light compensation point (LCP) of them was ‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (105.15 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (93.46 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (71.50 μmol·m-2·s-1) and the apparent quantum yield (AQY) was ‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (0.0155 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (0.0127 μmol·m-2·s-1)>‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (0.0111 μmol·m-2·s-1).CO2 saturation point (CSP) of the three Acer mono Maxim.varieties was ‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (1 271.43 μmol/mol)>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (1 150 μmol/mol)>‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (1 137.5 μmol/mol),CO2 saturation point (CCP) of them was ‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (153.03 μmol/mol)>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (149.08 μmol/mol)>‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (129.33 μmol/mol).And the carboxylation efficiency (CE) was ‘Taishanjingfu No.2’ (0.0195)>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’ (0.0186)>‘Taishanjingfu No.1’ (0.0169).The chlorophyll content of unit leaf mass of them was ‘Taishanjingfu No.1’>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’> ‘Taishanjingfu No.2’．The ability of photosynthesis was ‘Taishanjingfu No.1’>‘Taishantianwaicun No.1’> ‘Taishanjingfu No.2’.
参考文献/References:
[1]臧德奎.园林树木学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007. [2]张天麟.园林树木1600种[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010. [3]王忠.植物生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000. [4]文建雷,刘志龙,王姝清.水分胁迫条件下元宝枫的光合特征及水分利用效率[J].西北林学院学报,2003,18(2):1-3． [5]伍维模,李志军,罗青红,等.土壤水分胁迫对胡杨、灰叶胡杨光合作用-光响应特性的影响[J].林业科学,2007,43(5):30-35． [6]师生波,李惠梅,王学英,等.青藏高原几种典型高山植物的光合特性比较[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(1):40-46． [7]吴飞燕,伊力塔,李修鹏,等.不同光照强度对石栎幼苗叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2012,43(4):88-92． [8]涂大正.植物生理学[M].哈尔滨:东北师范大学出版社,1992.
相似文献/References:
[1]顾艾博,董 然,马家艳,等.重金属Cr胁迫下两种玉簪光合特性研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(13):60.
GU Ai-bo,DONG Ran,MA Jia-yan,et al.Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics in Two Hosta Cultivars Under Heavy Metal Cr Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):60.
[2]张 芬,张 波,田丽萍,等.盐胁迫对番茄幼苗叶片光合特性及叶绿素和β-胡萝卜素含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(11):15.
ZHANG Fen,ZHANG Bo,TIAN Li-ping,et al.Effect of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristic and the Content of Chlorophyll and β-carotene in Tomato Seedling Leaves[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):15.
[3]陈祥伟,刘世琦,刘 庆,等.不同LED光源对小白菜生长及光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(22):1.
CHEN Xiang-wei,LIU Shi-qi,LIU Qing,et al.Effects of Different Light Qualities on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Pakchoi[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):1.
[4]王春丽,楚金萍,阿依夏木·托乎提,等.氮磷钾不同配比对加工番茄育苗质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(14):14.
WANG Chun-li,CHU Jin-ping,AYIXIAMU Tuohuti,et al.Effect of Different Proportions of Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium on the Quality of Processing Tomato Seedling[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):14.
[5]王丽媛,周厚高.不同营养组合和施肥量对切花百合光合特性及干物质含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):58.
WANG Li-yuan,ZHOU Hou-gao.Effect of Nutrient Combinations and Fertilizing Amount on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter of Cut-flower Lily[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):58.
[6]张振宇,王鹏,王淑安,等.‘金薇’叶片呈色的结构和生理基础研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):68.
ZHANG Zhen-yu,WANG Peng,WANG Shu-an,et al.Study on Structure and Physiological Basis of Leaf Colouring in Lagerstroemia indica L.‘Jinwei’[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):68.
[7]郑宝刚,叶露幻,宋涛,等.银杏新梢叶片光合与荧光特性研究[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):65.
ZHENG Bao-gang,YE Lu-huan,SONG Tao,et al.Study on Photosynthesis and Fluorescence Characteristics of Ginkgo biloba L.Shoots Leaves[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):65.
[8]王少平,黄超.切花菊‘黄中黄’对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].北方园艺,2013,37(15):64.
WANG Shao-ping,HUANG Chao.Physiological Response of Cut Chrysanthemum ‘Huangzhonghuang’ to Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):64.
[9]许华,陈甜甜,朱敏杰,等.三裂叶蟛蜞菊入侵对三种杂草若干生理特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(07):72.
XU Hua,CHEN Tian-tian,ZHU Min-jie,et al.Effect of Wedelia trilobata L.Invasion on Several Physiological Characteristics of Three Weeds[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(02):72.
[10]邱清华,邓绍云.盐胁迫对七个品种紫菜薹种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(18):27.
QIU Qing-hua,DENG Shao-yun.Influence of Salt Stress on Seeds Germination and Seedling Growth of Brassica campestris [J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(02):27.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：于永畅（1987-），男，山东泰安人，硕士，研究方向为园林植物遗传育种。E-mail：yyc6335@163.com.