|Table of Contents|

Litter Decomposition Characteristic of Ten Common Garden Tree Species

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年05
Page:
75-82
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Litter Decomposition Characteristic of Ten Common Garden Tree Species
Author(s):
FANG Ling12CHEN Min1LIN Yuhu12SUN Xudong12CHEN Changqing3CHEN Juan12
(1.College of Urban and Rural Construction and Planning,Mianyang Normal University,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000;2.Sichuan University Engineering Research Center of Rural Human Settlement Environment Construction in Northwest Sichuan,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000;3.Mianyang Taiyi Xianshan Botanical Garden,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000)
Keywords:
litterdecomposition ratenutrient releasedecomposition factor
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213885
Abstract:
Taking 10 common garden tree species as test materials,the litter natural decomposition experiment was carried out by using litter decomposition net bag method,and the litter decomposition rate and nutrient release were studied,in order to provide reference for scientific management and protection of urban garden tree species and optimization of urban green space function.The results showed that,1) The litter decomposition rates of the 10 species were as follow,poplar>pomegranate>crape myrtle>coralpark>spring elm>sycamore>wintersweet>honey locust>paulownia>red maple.2) In the process of litter decomposition,the organic C and total N release rates were faster in poplar,pomegranate and crape myrtle,while the total P released faster in crape myrtle,poplar and spring elm.No significant differences of cellulose decomposition rate were found in the 10 tree species.Lignin decomposes slowly,while hemicellulose decomposes faster in spring elm,poplar and pomegranate.3)The litter decomposition rate significantly declined with the increase of litter initial concentration of organic C and total N,and the litter N/P ratio,while presented no significant correlations to litter C/N ratio,lignin/N ratio and lignin concentration.

References:

[1]刘静如,郭可馨,谌亚,等.亚热带森林凋落叶分解过程中土壤节肢动物群落变化特征[J].生态学报,2021(7):1-13.[2]王亚军,郁珊珊.城市绿化植物-凋落物-土壤系统碳氮磷化学计量特征研究[J].西北植物学报,2017,37(1):171-180.[3]周文昌,史玉虎,潘磊,等.人工湿地3种植物凋落物分解及其对水位降低的响应[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,53(2):242-247.[4]张国龙.大针茅群落物种丰富度和功能多样性对混合凋落物分解特征的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2019.[5]舒韦维,陈琳,刘世荣,等.减雨对南亚热带马尾松人工林凋落物分解的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(13):4538-4545.[6]马红叶,潘学军,张文娥.林木凋落物分解及其化感作用研究进展[J].贵州农业科学,2020,48(10):97-101.[7]车文玉.上海香樟群落凋落物量及养分归还动态[D].上海:华东师范大学,2015.[8]郑思俊,张庆费,吴海萍,等.上海外环线绿地群落凋落物对土壤水分物理性质的影响[J].生态学杂志,2008(7):1122-1126.[9]章志琴,林勇明,王宛茜,等.无锡城市绿地凋落物数量特征及其影响因素研究[J].西南林业大学学报,2020,40:69-76.[10]徐文铎,陈玮,何兴元,等.沈阳城市森林凋落物数量及动态[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(11):2931-2939.[11]TAYLOR B R,PARKINSON D,PARSONS W F J.Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates:A microcosm test[J].Ecology,1989,70(1):97-104.[12]李娜,赵传燕,郝虎,等.不同海拔条件下祁连山青海云杉林叶凋落物分解过程及养分的动态变化[J].生态学报,2021(11):1-10.[13]杨丽丽,龚吉蕊,刘敏,等.氮沉降对草地凋落物分解的影响研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2017,41(8):894-913.[14]黄天颖.氮素添加对城市森林凋落物早期分解过程的影响[D].上海:上海交通大学,2017.[15]范晓慧,马勇,冯家豪,等.北方城市10种常见树木凋落叶的分解及养分释放特征[J].西北林学院学报,2020,35(6):25-31.[16]潘冬荣,柳小妮,申国珍,等.神农架不同海拔典型森林凋落物的分解特征[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3361-3366.[17]郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等.森林凋落物分解研究进展[J].林业科学,2006(4):93-100.[18]赵月彩.万木林主要群落凋落物分解和养分释放研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2009.[19]刘姝媛,胡浪云,储双双,等.3种林木凋落物分解特征及其对赤红壤酸度及养分含量的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2013,22(3):11-17.[20]MANZONI S,TROFYMOW J A,JACKSON R B,et al.Stoichiometric controls on carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter[J].Ecological Monographs,2010,80(1):89-106.[21]庞梅.古田山亚热带常绿阔叶林叶片凋落物分解与凋落物性状关系研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2018.[22]郑兴蕊,宋娅丽,王克勤,等.滇中常绿阔叶林凋落物养分释放及生态化学计量特征对模拟N沉降的响应[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(1):23-30.[23]刘华,张丹桔,张健,等.马尾松人工林林窗大小对四种凋落叶质量损失和养分释放的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(2):513-522.[24]杨继松,刘景双,于君宝,等.三江平原沼泽湿地枯落物分解及其营养动态[J].生态学报,2006(5):1297-1302.[25]张林海,曾从盛,张文娟,等.闽江河口湿地枯落物分解及主要影响因子[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(9):2404-2410.[26]van GEFFEN K G,POORTER L,SASS-KLAASSEN,et al.The trait contribution to wood decomposition rates of 15 neotropical tree species[J].Ecology,2010,91(12):3686-3697.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-24