|Table of Contents|

Effect of Sorghum Green Manure on the Physicochemical Properties and Fungi Community of Facilities Cucumber Rhizosphere Soil

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年03
Page:
93-101
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Sorghum Green Manure on the Physicochemical Properties and Fungi Community of Facilities Cucumber Rhizosphere Soil
Author(s):
HU Yun1; YAN Hai′ou1; ZHAO Shuwen2; WANG Liping1; CAO Ruiliang1; WANG Xueyu1
(1.Vocational Technical College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014109;2.College of Grassland,Resources and Environmengt,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010019)
Keywords:
facilities cucumber; green manure; fungi abundance; rhizosphere soil; high-throughput sequencing
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20192170
Abstract:
Facilities cucumber variety ‘Jinchun No.2’ was selected as the test material. In the test,treatments were amount of 240 kg·hm-2, 120 kg·hm-2, 60 kg·hm-2 of sorghum seeds which were respectively planted into the soil of greenhouse before planting cucumber. When the cucumber was planted, the green manure was cut into the soil to study on the change of soil physicochemical properties, enzymatic activity and fungal community.The effect of sorghum green manure on soil physicochemical properties and fungal community in rhizosphere soil were discussed . It provided a theoretical basis and practical guidance for practical applications.The results showed that in 120 kg·hm-2 of sorghum planting density, the content was significantly increased in rhizosphere soil during cucumber fruiting stage, available P 18.44%, available K 45.12%,alkaline N 7.96%,organic matter 18.36%.The ratio of Sordariales and Lasiosphaeriaceae was decreased in high sorghum density, the ratio of Mucorales,Hypocreales,Agaricales,Microascales,Atheliales,Umbelopsidaceae,Chaetomiaceae,Nectriaceae,Atheliaceae,Microascaceae and Mortierellaceae was increased.So the fungi community structure was changed. Green manure had huge potential value as well in improving soil conditions and optimizing microbial environment of facilities soil.

References:

[1]杨淏然,马兆红,司智霞.山东寿光设施蔬菜土壤修复对策与实例[J].中国蔬菜,2016(6):1-5.[2]赵辉,王喜英,谭智勇,等.贵州武陵片区设施农业发展中存在的问题及对策[J].北方园艺,2018(8):181-185.[3]张乐森,王振华,孟凡山,等.滨州保护地土壤退化原因分析与防治措施探讨[J].北方园艺,2013(20):146-149.[4]李丽,王雪艳,田彦芳,等.生物质炭对土壤养分及设施蔬菜产量与品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(5):1237-1244.[5]刘霓红,蒋先平,程俊峰,等.国外有机设施园艺现状及对中国设施农业可持续发展的启示[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):1-9.[6]谷端银,王秀峰,高俊杰,等.纯化腐植酸对氮胁迫下黄瓜幼苗生长和氮代谢的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(8):2575-2582.[7]董佳文,陈树良,肖靖,等.菠菜种质资源研究进展[J].北方园艺,2019(6):156-162.[8]姚鹏伟,张达斌,王峥,等.豆科绿肥养分累积规律及其对后茬小麦生长和产量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(3):111-117.[9]杨冬艳,郭文忠,杨自强,等.绿肥种植及翻压对日光温室土壤环境的影响[J].北方园艺,2009(10):146-148.[10]王慧,桂娟,刘满强,等.稻草和三叶草分解对微型土壤动物群落的影响[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):1124-1134.[11]彭映平,和文祥,王紫泉,等.黄土高原旱区绿肥定位试验土壤化学性质及酶活性特征研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(9):131-138,149.[12]佀国涵,赵书军,王瑞,等.连年翻压绿肥对植烟土壤物理及生物性状的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(4):905-912.[13]田明慧,张明发,田峰,等.不同绿肥翻压对玉米产量及土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(9):41-46.[14]冯海萍,张丽娟,曲继松,等.绿肥与化肥配施对日光温室土壤养分、微生物及芹菜产量的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2015,50(2):66-70.[15]杜威,王紫泉,和文祥,等.豆科绿肥对渭北旱塬土壤养分及生态化学计量学特征影响[J].土壤学报,2017,54(4):999-1008.[16]丁怡飞,曹永庆,姚小华,等.油茶间作不同绿肥的土壤分形及养分损耗特征[J].安徽农业大学学报,2018(5):867-871.[17]白小军,冯海萍,张丽娟,等.种植及翻压绿肥对设施土壤养分及微生物区系的影响[J].北方园艺,2014(23):144-147.[18]李丽娜,席运官,陈鄂,等.耕作方式与绿肥种植对土壤微生物组成和多样性的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(4):342-348.[19]冯海萍,张丽娟,曲继松,等.绿肥与化肥配施对日光温室土壤养分、微生物及芹菜产量的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2015,50(2):66-70.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-02-27