|Table of Contents|

Variation and Correlation Analysis of Juglans hopeiensis Hu Fruit Characters(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2016年02
Page:
6-11
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Variation and Correlation Analysis of Juglans hopeiensis Hu Fruit Characters
Author(s):
CHEN Menghua1; SHI Xinyu1; LIU Yang1; HAN Feiteng1; LI Baoguo1; 2; ZHANG Xuemei1; 2
（1.College of Forestry，Agricultural University of Hebei，Baoding，Hebei 071000；2.Research Center for Walnut Engineering and Technology of Hebei，Xingtai，Hebei 054000）
Keywords:
Juglans hopeiensis Hu; nut; character; variation; correlation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201602002
Abstract:
7 cultivars of J.hopeiensis Hu were used as materials.The main economic characters were determined by variation and correlation analysis，which included the weight，width，length，shape index of fruit and nut，green husk thickness，nut side diameter and mean diameter,in order to provide a theoretical basis for Juglans hopeiensis Hu farmer and fruit purchaser to select merit cultivars.The results showed that in the fruit characters，the single fruit weight and the width of ‘Da Guanmao’，the length of ‘Chengde Guangmao’，green husk thickness of ‘Mantian Xing’ were 109.01 g， 6.01 cm，5.79 cm and 1.17 cm，which were higher than those of other cultivars，and the rangers and variations of the single fruit weight，length and green husk thickness in ‘Sizuo Lou’ and the fruit shape index in ‘Chengde Guangmao’ and ‘Bai Shizi Tou’ respectively were 29.30 g，0.63 cm，0.29 cm，0.11，0.11 and 9.43%，3.63%，10.43%，3.07%，3.97%，which were lower than those of other cultivars.In the nut characters，the single nut weight，length，width，side diameter and mean diameter of ‘Da Guanmao’ were 33.47 g，4.47 cm，4.69 cm，4.39 cm and 4.52 cm，which were higher than those of other cultivars，and the rangers and variations of the single nut weight，length and mean diameter in ‘Sizuo Lou’ and ‘Pingguo Yuan’ and the nut shape index in ‘Sizuo Lou’ respectively were 9.00 g，0.43 cm，0.55 cm，9.00 g，0.44 cm，0.45 cm，0.13，and 11.26%，3.91%，4.24%，12.09%，3.48%，4.00%，4.66%，which were lower than those of other cultivars.The correlation analysis of fruit and nut characters showed that both the single fruit weight and the single nut weight and nut width，and the fruit length and nut shape index had significant positive correlation，and the single fruit weight and the nut length and mean diameter，fruit length and nut length，and green husk thickness and nut length all had highly significant positive correlation.

References:

 

[1]张宇.文玩核桃土肥水管理[J].河北林业科技,2012(4):90-91.

[2]和凌云.麻核桃春季栽培技术要点[J].河北林业,2011(2):38.

[3]李瑞平,李维泉,宋立功.保定市麻核桃产业现状分析与发展探讨[J].林业实用技术,2012(11):60-61.

[4]马燕,靳丽鑫,张雪梅,等.不同麻核桃品种物候期观察和花粉特性研究[J].北方园艺,2014(15):17-21.

[5]薄颖生,翟梅枝,毛富春,等.不同核桃品种果实外观性状差异性比较[J].北方园艺,2013(12):12-14.

[6]张琦,程滨,赵瑞芬,等.不同品种核桃外观品质和矿质养分含量的比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2011，27(4):301-305.

[7]张美勇,徐颖,刘嘉芬,等.核桃不同品种果实坚果品质分析[J].中国农学通报,2008，24(12):313-316.

[8]时燕,刘冬芝,赵登超,等.山东鸡爪绵核桃果实经济性状鉴定与选优[J].经济林研究,2010(4):72-78.

[9]许静,翟梅枝,肖志娟,等.4个不同核桃品种物候观察及品质分析[J].中国农学通报,2013,29（31）:42-46.

[10]虎海防.不同主栽区核桃坚果品质研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2013.

[11]吴开志,肖千文,唐礼贵,等.核桃种仁粗脂肪和氨基酸含量的差异性分析[J].经济林研究,2007(2):15-18.

[12]时燕,王雪,赵登超,等.鸡爪绵核桃坚果质量与坚果三径变异及相关性研究[J].山东林业科技,2009(5):10-13.

[13]常君,杨水平,姚小华,等.美国山核桃果实性状变异规律研究[J].林业科学研究,2008(1):44-48.

[14]孟亚楠.核桃坚果性状遗传特性与优系选择研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2010.

[15]化婷.‘香玲’核桃坚果性状分析[D].济南:山东师范大学,2014.

[16]薄颖生,彭少兵,翟梅枝,等.核桃青果与坚果外观性状相关性研究[J].北方园艺,2014（8）:13-17.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-03-15