|Table of Contents|

Effects of Four Soil Management Methods on Soil Moisture Content in Wild Fruit Forest

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年5
Page:
108-114
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Four Soil Management Methods on Soil Moisture Content in Wild Fruit Forest
Author(s):
CHENG Gong1; 2; LIU Hongyao2; LIU Liqiang1; LIAO Kang1; Mansur·NASIR1
(1.College of Horticulture，Xinjiang Agricultural University，Urumqi，Xinjiang 830052；2.Handan Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Handan，Hebei 056000)
Keywords:
Xinyuan wild fruit forest; soil management mode; soil moisture content
PACS:
S 152.7
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20243203
Abstract:
Taking the soil of wild fruit forest in Xinyuan county of Xinjiang as the test material,the soil moisture content of 0-50 cm depth was continuously monitored by EM50 soil moisture monitoring system,and the annual variation law of soil moisture content at different depths was studied by using four soil management methods:plastic mulch,ground cloth,grow grass and weeding,in order to optimize and adjust the planting mode,adopt planting management measures that seek benefits and avoid harm,improve the survival rate of wild fruit trees,and provide reference for accelerating the recovery speed of wild fruit forests.The results showed that the soil moisture content in different soil layers could be improved by plastic mulch,ground cloth and grow grass during the year,but the effects of different soil layers were different.Growing grass had the best effect on improving soil water content in 10 cm soil layer,which was 3.4%,16.8% and 18.8% higher than that of plastic mulch,ground cloth and weeding respectively.Plastic mulch and ground cloth could increase the soil water content of 20-50 cm soil layer,among which,the average soil moisture content of plastic mulch was 8. 8%,24.7% and 36.5% higher than that of ground cloth,grow grass and weeding respectively.The influence of different management methods on shallow soil moisture content was greater than that of deep soil,and deep soil had a strong buffering effect on the change of moisture content.Surface cover and grow grass could slow down the evaporation of soil moisture content in each soil layer,but the soil moisturizing effect of various management methods in different periods was different.In general,the moisturizing effect of each management method was as follows plastic mulch>ground cloth >grow grass> weeding.

References:

［1］崔志军,张彦龙,罗朝辉,等.苹果小吉丁虫(Agrilus mali Matsumura)对野苹果林的危害及其评估［J］.干旱区研究,2018,35(5):1153-1159.［2］刘爱华,张新平,岳朝阳,等.飞机超低量喷雾防治天山野果林苹果小吉丁防效研究［J］.新疆农业科学,2016,53(11):2083-2089.［3］廖康.新疆野生果树资源研究［M］.乌鲁木齐:新疆科学技术出版社,2013.［4］程功,刘立强,颉刚刚,等.新源野果林主要气象特征和人工更新集雨防草技术研究［J］.经济林研究,2018,36(3):127-135,150.［5］王晓军,刘华,马斌,等.干旱地区不同颜色覆膜对土壤水热及茴香产量的影响［J］.北方园艺,2024(5):75-81.［6］杨庆楠,高士军,张何普,等.秸秆覆盖对土壤水热状况的影响［J］.中国农学通报,2024,40(8):80-85.［7］胡颖慧,顾广军,卜海东,等.不同覆盖措施对寒地苹果园土壤物理特性和树体生长的影响［J］.中国果树,2024(1):17-24.［8］焦锦堂,孙万仓,方彦,等.冬油菜覆盖对土壤理化性状及微生物的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(6):128-139.［9］赵伶俐.干旱区瓜田不同压砂覆盖对土壤水分蒸发的影响及回归模型［J］.中国瓜菜,2020,33(12):39-43.［10］王永亮,胥子航,李申,等.不同覆盖措施对土壤水热状况及春玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响［J］.作物学报,2024,50(5):1312-1324.［11］刘青,马建涛,韩凡香,等.不同覆盖材料对旱地马铃薯土壤水分和耗水的影响［J］.水土保持研究,2023,30(6):197-205.［12］刘志琨,景晨娟,王端,等.不同地面覆盖对杏扁园土壤理化性质和树体生长的影响［J］.中国果树,2023(6):67-71,122.［13］王文,王振磊,吴翠云,等.不同覆盖材料对干旱区枣园土壤温度、水分及果实品质的影响［J］.塔里木大学学报,2022,34(3):32-39.［14］陈媛媛.杉木人工林土壤水分与环境因子关系研究［D］.长沙:中南林业科技大学,2013.［15］董金义,罗敏,孟凡浩,等.蒙古高原土壤水分时空格局演变特征分析［J］.水土保持研究,2024,31(2):110-121.［16］朱华德.五龙池小流域土壤水分时空变异及其与主要影响因子的关系［D］.武汉:华中农业大学,2014.［17］范新瑞.典型喀斯特石漠化地区土壤含水量变化的初步分析:以普定县陈家寨石漠化基地为例［D］.贵阳:贵州大学,2009.［18］彭超,陈月华,吴际友.不同地表覆盖对地表温度、湿度和土壤水分的影响［J］.中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(4):54-59.［19］王晓军,刘华,马斌,等.干旱地区不同颜色覆膜对土壤水热及茴香产量的影响［J］.北方园艺,2024(5):75-81.［20］王敬哲,刘志辉,塔西甫拉提·特依拜,等.天山北坡融雪期季节性冻土融化过程分析［J］.干旱区研究,2017,34(2):282-292.［21］李虹辰,赵西宁,高晓东,等.鱼鳞坑与覆盖组合措施对陕北旱作枣园土壤水分的影响［J］.应用生态学报,2014,25(8):2297-2303.［22］廖小龙,廖康,刘曼曼,等.库尔勒香梨园地面覆盖对土壤含水量的影响［J］.新疆农业科学,2014,51(7):1213-1218.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-03-14