|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia on Soil Improvement

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2023年08
Page:
63-69
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia on Soil Improvement
Author(s):
SUN Nan; QIN Xin; LIU Yangbo; YIN Yijun; MAO Yunfei; SHEN Xiang
(College of Horticulture Science and Engineering,Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology,Tai′an,Shandong 271018)
Keywords:
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.; saline-alkali soil; mineral elements; soil improvement
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20222830
Abstract:
Taking three-year-old Elaeagnus angustifolia L.as the research material,according to the growth difference of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.,it was divided into three grades from best to bad,Y1,Y2 and Y3,the soil improvement effect of different growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. were studied,in order to provide reference for the promotion and application of Elaeagnus angustifolia L..The results showed that Elaeagnus angustifolia L. could effectively reduce the soil pH value,and Y1 had the most significant effect on the reduction of pH value.The pH value in September was 6.8% lower than that in July.The contents of mineral elements such as nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium,iron and zinc in the three growing Elaeagnus angustifolia L.soils were significantly higher than those in CK,and the contents of each element were Y1>Y2>Y3.The activities of soil sucrase and urease were increased by Elaeagnus angustifolia L.with different growth potential.The soil enzyme activities were Y1>Y2>Y3>CK.In the improved microbial community,the number of bacteria in Y1 was significantly higher than that of CK,Y2 and Y3,and the number of fungi was significantly lower than that of CK,Y2 and Y3.In conclusion,Elaeagnus angustifolia L. could effectively improve the soil quality of saline alkali land,improve soil enzyme activity and improve soil microbial community.The better the growth of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.,the better the improvement effect of saline alkali land.

References:

[1]杨学涛,李品芳,侯振安,等.玛纳斯河流域不同地貌单元弃耕地土壤盐分差异研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1241-1246.[2]武海雯,杨秀艳,王计平,等.沙枣改善盐碱土壤养分的研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(11):3527-3534.[3]QADIR M,QUILLROU E,NANGIA V.Economics of salt induced land degradation and restoration[J].Natural Resources Forum：A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal,2014,38:282-295．[4]HASANUZZAMAN M,NAHAR K,ALAM M M,et al.Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils[J].BioMed Research International,2014，2014:589341.[5]关洪斌,王晓兰,冷俊昭,等.沙枣对滨海盐渍土的改良作用探究[J].资源开发与市场,2012,28(1):9-10,50.[6]陈春晓,谢秀华,王宇鹏,等.盐分和干旱对沙枣幼苗生理特性的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(12):4540-4550.[7]郭丽君,王玉涛.沙枣种质资源特性及利用价值[J].中国野生植物资源,2008(5):32-34.[8]杨庆山,周健,王莉莉,等.沙枣响应盐碱胁迫机制研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2021,53(2):137-141.[9]ENESCU C M.Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.)：A multipurpose species with an important role in land reclamation[J].Current Trends in Natural Sciences,2018（7）:54-60．[10]FARZAEIA M H,BAHRAMSOLTANIC R,ABBASABADIA Z,et al.Acomprehensive review on phytochemical and pharmacological asp ects of Elaeagnus angustifolia L.[J].Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology,2015,67:1467-1480．[11]SARVARIAN M,JAFARPOUR A,AWUCHI C G,et al.Changes in physicochemical,free radical activity,total phenolic and sensory properties of orange (Citrus sinensis L.) juice fortified with different oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) extracts[J].Molecules,2022,27(5):1530.[12]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.[13]华菊玲,刘光荣,黄劲松.连作对芝麻根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(9)：2936-2942.[14]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.[15]赵军霞.土壤酸碱性与植物的生长[J].内蒙古农业科技,2003(6):33-34.[16]和文祥,谭向平,王旭东,等.土壤总体酶活性指标的初步研究[J].土壤学报,2010,47(6):1232-1236.[17]刘业萍,毛云飞,胡艳丽,等.苹果园生草对土壤微生物多样性、酶活性及碳组分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(10):1792-1805.[18]张晓芹,李国庆,杜盛.未来气候变化对沙枣适宜分布区的影响预测[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(10):3213-3220.[19]王慧,解文斌,刘宁,等.基于栽植沙枣的晋北盐碱地土壤改良处理组合研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):281-287.[20]SHAO T Y,GU X Y,ZHU T S,et al.Industrial crop Jerusalem artichoke restored coastal saline soil quality by reducing salt and increasing diversity of bacterial community[J].Appl.Soil Ecol,2019,138:195-206.[21]LIU M L,WANG C,LIU X L,et al.Saline-alkali soil applied with vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer improved macroaggregate microstructure to enhance salt leaching and inhibit nitrogen losses[J].Appl Soil Ecol,2020,156:103705.[22]ZHANG C,ZHOU X H,WANG X Y,et al.Elaeagnus angustifolia can improve salt-alkali soil and the health level of soil：Emphasizing the driving role of core microbial communities[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2021,305:114401.[23]代金霞,田平雅,张莹,等.银北盐渍化土壤中6种耐盐植物根际细菌群落结构及其多样性[J].生态学报,2019,39(8):2705-2714.[24]尹伊君,毛云飞,杨露,等.增氧灌溉对平邑甜茶生长及根区土壤的影响[J].林业科学,2021,57(10):59-70.[25]张翠萍,孟平,李建中,等.磷元素和土壤酸化交互作用对核桃幼苗光合特性的影响[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(12):1345-1355.[26]林万树,沈金泉,黄功标,等.果园土壤中、微量元素含量及其与pH值有机质含量的关系[J].河南农业科学,2015,44(5):77-80.[27]蔡凯,高维常,潘文杰,等.贵州烟田土壤pH、交换性钙镁和CaCO3含量分布特征及其相互关系[J].土壤通报,2022,53(3):532-539.[28]吴玉森,张艳敏,冀晓昊,等.自然生草对黄河三角洲梨园土壤养分、酶活性及果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(1):99-108.[29]NING X L,WANG X H,GUAN Z Y,et al.Effects of different patterns of maize-straw application on soil microorganisms,enzyme activities,and grain yield[J].Bioengineered,2021,12(1):3684-3698.[30]DANIEL G,BRUCE A L,PATRICIA A L.Effect of fertilization on soil microorganisms in paddy rice systems：A meta-analysis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,115:452-460．[31]闵红,和文祥,李晓明,等.黄土丘陵区植被恢复过程中土壤微生物数量演变特征[J].西北植物学报,2007(3):588-593.[32]薛立,邝立刚,陈红跃,等.不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J].土壤学报,2003(2):280-285.[33]李亮,包耀贤,廖超英,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北部沙区人工林土壤微生物及酶活性研究[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(5):987-994.[34]胡亚林,汪思龙,颜绍馗.影响土壤微生物活性与群落结构因素研究进展[J].土壤通报,2006(1):170-176.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2023-05-12