|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Micro-spray Height on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Grape

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年03
Page:
53-57
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Micro-spray Height on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Grape
Author(s):
ZHANG Heng1; LIU Hongbo2; LIU Hongmei1; YANG Xue1; DONG Huancheng1
(1.Civil Engineering College,Kashgar University,Kashgar,Xinjiang 844006;2.Xinjiang Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Sciences,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830049)
Keywords:
‘Thompson Seedless’ grape; micro-spray height; photosynthesis characteristics; yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213438
Abstract:
Taking ‘Thompson Seedless’ grape as the test material,the photosynthetic characteristics and fruit of grape leaves were monitored by micro-spraying at different heights (WP1,50 cm above the shelf;WP2,50 cm below the shelf;WP3,30 cm above ground).The growth and development of fruit grains，and the effects of different micro-spray heights on the growth and development of grape fruits were studied，in order to provide a reference for the increase and efficiency of ‘Thompon Seedless’ grape.The results showed that the daily average SPAD value of the micro-spraying treatment was higher than that of control,and the daily average SPAD value of WP1 was the highest;the net photosynthetic rate of WP1,WP2,and WP3 were increased by 6.6%,11.2%,and 1.5% lower than control,respectively.The fruit size and growth rate of each treatment were WP2,WP3,CK,WP1 in descending order,and WP2 was significantly different from other treatments.In terms of grape yield indicators,WP2 had the highest yield,reaching 51 490.95 kg·hm-2,which was an increasing of 6.7% compared with CK;in the other treatments,WP1 and WP3 were 24.2% and 29.1% lower than CK,respectively.It could be concluded that micro-spraying at 50 cm below the shelf for 1 hour a day could promote photosynthesis of grapes and played a certain role in increasing grape production.

References:

[1]朱雨晴,杨再强.高温高湿对设施葡萄叶片气孔和光合特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(23):94-101.[2]张江辉,刘洪波,白云岗,等.果园微气候因子改善葡萄净光合速率与蒸腾速率研究[J].北方园艺,2020(1):27-33.[3]张衡,白云岗,雷晓云,等.弥雾微喷调控对吐哈盆地葡萄产量和品质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(6):27-31,44.[4]王竞,李磊,王锐,等.不同生育期水分亏缺对酿酒葡萄光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(22):157-160.[5]单守明,平吉成,王振平,等.不同架式对设施葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2010,29(2):107-111.[6]郑明,张江辉,白云岗,等.弥雾微喷对葡萄光合特性,产量及品质的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2020，38(9):933-938,944.[7]王冬至.微喷对葡萄园温、湿度及产量的影响研究[J].节水灌溉,2018,279(11):38-43.[8]刘洪波，白云岗，张江辉，等.不同微喷弥雾调控方式下微气候因子对极端干旱区葡萄果实生长及糖度的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(4):159-167.[9]ZHA Q,XI X,JIANG A,et al.Changes in the protective mechanism of photosystemⅡ and molecular regulation in response to high temperature stress in grapevines[J].Plant Physiology & Biochemistry,2016,101:43-53.[10]MAN J,YU J,WHITE P J,et al.Effects of supplemental irrigation with micro-sprinkling hoses on water distribution in soil and grain yield of winter wheat[J].Field Crops Research,2014,161:26-37.[11]吴志军,田丽敏,左俊伟,等.叶幕高度对“赤霞珠”葡萄叶幕微气候及其品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(1):57-61.[12]许泽华,牛锐敏,沈甜,等.不同架型对玉泉营“美乐”葡萄营养生长及品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(24):27-34.[13]于咏,孟江飞,惠竹梅,等.反光膜和摘叶处理对“红地球”葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(11):33-39.[14]蔡军社,王爱玲,白世践,等.高温干燥气候下不同摘叶方式对“赤霞珠”葡萄果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018(22):37-42.[15]白云岗,刘洪波,冯杰.微喷弥雾调控灌水技术对葡萄生理和产量的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(19):164-169.[16]王珍,刘迪迪,张振文.叶幕厚度对“赤霞珠”葡萄叶幕微气候,光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(17):27-35.[17]成果,陈立业,王军,等.2种整形方式对‘赤霞珠’葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].果树学报,2015,32(2):215-224.[18]江莉，陈清西，陈婷，等.树形改造对‘巨峰’葡萄叶片光合特性和果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(17):16-22.[19]贾杨.吐鲁番葡萄叶幕微气候差异及若干葡萄品种光合特性研究[D].乌鲁木齐：新疆农业大学,2015.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-04-22