|Table of Contents|

Analysis of Selenium and Heavy Metals Content in Phellinus linteus Fruiting Bodies

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2022年05
Page:
104-111
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Analysis of Selenium and Heavy Metals Content in Phellinus linteus Fruiting Bodies
Author(s):
LIU Xiaoxiao1; 2; ZHANG Zhendu1; 2; ZHANG Qi1; 2; HAO Lishan1; 2; LI Shengnan1; 2; WEI Chunyan1; 2
(1.Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology,Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Changchun,Jilin 130033;2.Risk Assessment Lab of Agri-products Quality and Safety (Changchun),Ministry Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Changchun,Jilin 130033)
Keywords:
Phellinus linteus; fruiting bodies; selenium; heavy metals
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20213417
Abstract:
The fruit body of Phellinus linteus was used as material,and the method of inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-Ms) was used,the differences of Se,As,Hg,Pb,Cd and Cr among species,producing areas,growing years,cultivation media and cultivation methods were studied,in order to provide reference for the cultivation and resource development of Phellinus linteus.The results showed that the detection rate of Se in the fruit body of Phellinus linteus was 83.3% ,and the Se content in the fruit body of Phellinus linteus had significant difference (P<0.05) There was no significant difference of Se content in the fruiting body of Phellinus linteus(P<0.05) Among the growth years,cultivation media and cultivation methods,the Se content in the flos Mori was 0.160 0 mg?kg-1,the Se content in Flos Mori was 0.054 0 mg?kg-1.The detection rates of five heavy metals were all 100%.There were significant differences in the contents of five heavy metals (P<0.05) in the fruit bodies of Phellinus linteus from different habitats,species,growth years,cultivation media and cultivation methods.The content of chromium was the highest among the five heavy metals,the highest was 5.06 mg?kg-1.The content of arsenic,Mercury,lead and cadmium was lower than the national standard of food safety.But the coefficient of variation was less than 1 and the degree of dispersion was low.

References:

[1]齐欣,张峻,陈颖,等.六种不同树种桑黄有效成分的比较[J].食品科学,2010,31(6):199-201.[2]吕英华,王建芳,李玉平,等.药用真菌桑黄的研究进展[J].蚕业科学,2009，35(1):204-210.[3]丁云云,刘锋.桑黄化学成分及体外抗肿瘤活性研究[J].中国中药杂志,2016,41(16):3042-3048.[4]孙培龙,徐双阳,杨开,等.珍稀药用真菌桑黄的国内外研究进展[J].微生物学报,2006(2):119-123.[5]史帧婷,包海鹰.桑黄类真菌有效成分及功效研究进展[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2016,22(22):197-202.[6]崔诗遥,朗明紫,但彩云,等.桑黄活性成分及其药理作用研究进展[J].蚕桑通报,2021，52(1):10-13.[7]吕芳,孙浩.山药桑黄酒精饮料的发酵工艺[J].食品工业,2020,41(11):74-78.[8]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会，国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准 食品中污染物限量:GB 2762-2017[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2017.[9]陕西省质量技术监督局.桑黄标准综合体 第6部分：子实体干品质量要求:DB 61/T 1158.6-2018[S].西安：陕西标准出版社，2018.[10]唐玉霞,王慧敏,刘巧玲,等.土壤和植物硒素研究综述[J].河北农业科学,2008(5):43-45.[11]靳元元,马生军,徐万里,等.不同产地黄芪活性成分与硒含量比较分析[J].新疆农业科学,2021,58(5):873-881.[12]邢增涛,唐庆九,周昌艳,等.不同灵芝子实体及其粗多糖中微量元素及重金属含量分析[J].菌物系统,2002,21(1):107-111.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-24