|Table of Contents|

Cold Resistance and Physiological Indexes of Different Apricot Cultivars

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2021年03
Page:
27-32
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Cold Resistance and Physiological Indexes of Different Apricot Cultivars
Author(s):
YANG Fukang; YANG Yanjun; SONG Yonghong; LI Jingjiang; LYU Zhenbing
(Pomology Institute，Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Taiyuan,Shanxi 030031)
Keywords:
apricot cultivars; cold resistance; relative conductivity; malondialdehyde; SOD
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20201405
Abstract:
Dormant branches and flower branches of one-year-old ‘Jinmeixing’‘Kate’‘Jidanxing’‘Jintaiyang’ were taken as test materials.Through different low-temperature treatments，the membrane permeability，protective enzyme activity and osmotic adjustment substances were measured.Comparing changes in physiological indicators at low temperatures，as well as the relationship with cold resistance.Analyzing the correlation between various indicators,in order to provide reference for selecting new cold resistant cultivar.The results showed that with the decrease of temperature，the changes of the relative conductivity of branches，MDA content in branches，the content of proline in branches，MDA content in flowers and the content of proline in flowers showed an upward trend.The changes of SOD activity in branches and flowers showed a trend of rising first and then decreasing.MDA content in branches of ‘Kate’ was significantly different from that of the other three cultivars.The content of proline in the branches of ‘Jintaiyang’ was significantly different from that of the other three cultivars.MDA content in flowers was negatively correlated with the cold resistance of four apricot cultivars.Except for ‘Jidanxing’，the proline content in the branches was positively correlated with cold resistance.Relative conductivity was significantly positively correlated with SOD activity in branches，proline content in branches，and MDA content in flowers，and was significantly negatively correlated with proline content in flowers.MDA content in flowers was significantly negatively correlated with SOD activity in flowers and proline content in flowers.SOD activity in flowers was significantly positively correlated with proline content in flowers.The order of the cold resistance of the four apricot cultivars was ‘Jintaiyang’>‘Jinmeixing’>‘Jidanxing’>‘Kate’.

References:

[1]杨向娜,魏安智,杨途熙,等.仁用杏3个生理指标与抗寒性的关系研究[J].西北林学院学报,2006(3):30-33.[2]钟杰阳,张玉莲.低温对不同杏品种枝条中MDA含量和电导率的影响[J].天津农业科学,2013,19(5):93-96.[3]庞然.朝阳地区大扁杏“优一”抗寒性的研究[J].林业科技通讯,2019(4):78-79.[4]古力娜?阿拉山,阿尔斯兰.低温胁迫下5个杏树品种的抗寒性研究[J].防护林科技,2016(10):43-45.[5]王佳.低温胁迫对不同杏品种抗性指标的影响[J].山西林业科技,2014,43(2):20-22.[6]于庆帆.伊犁地区树上干杏6个不同株系抗寒性的研究[D].石河子：石河子大学,2018.[7]王泽华,秦伟.不同居群新疆野苹果生理响应差异与抗寒性的关系[J].经济林研究,2018,36(2):20-28.[8]杨晓华,戴桂林,聂国伟,等.杏枝条电导率与花器官耐霜性的关系[J].山西农业科学,2011,39(12):1284-1286.[9]吉春容,邹陈,陈丛敏,等.低温胁迫下巴旦杏的形态生理变化及抗寒性研究[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(4):955-962.[10]孙延超,杨太新,袁梦佳.不同柴胡种质抗寒性及生理指标的相关性研究[J].中药材,2020(1):5-8.[11]李清亚,路斌,赵佳伟,等.低温胁迫对北美豆梨电阻抗参数与抗寒性的影响[J].西部林业科学,2019,48(6):156-160，168.[12]张翔,杨勇,刘学勇等.外源水杨酸对低温胁迫下海滨雀稗抗寒生理特征的影响[J].草叶学报,2020,29(1):117-124.[13]韩立群,马凯,丁军伟,等.低温处理下新疆野生核桃的生理响应及抗寒性评价[J].西北林学院学报,2019,34(5):98-101.[14]闫忠业,吕天星,王冬梅,等.低温下六个苹果新品种抗性生理指标的比较[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(1):93-96.[15]杨盛,郭黄萍,郝国伟,等.山西部分梨品种抗寒性测定及生理指标研究[J].农学学报 2014,4(12):72-77.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-05-27