|Table of Contents|

Effects of Optimized Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Grape With Facility-delayed Cultivation

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年23
Page:
24-30
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Optimized Fertilization on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Grape With Facility-delayed Cultivation
Author(s):
CHE Shengguo1; 2; TANG Jiwei2; NIE Zhansheng3; DONG Lisheng3
(1.Heze Foresty Bureau,Heze,Shandong 274000；2.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,Ministry of Agrculture and Rural Affairs,Beijing 100081;3.Tianzhu Agro-Tech Extension Center,Tianzhu,Gansu 733299)
Keywords:
grape; the optimized fertilization; nutrient uptake; increasing yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20200590
Abstract:
In order to explore the best fertilization strategy for grape with facility-delayed cultivation,six fertilizer treatments under the same amount of organic fertilizer application,such as high nitrogen (HN),high potassium (HK),optimized fertilization (OPT),fertilization with phosphate and potassium fertilizer (PK),fertilization with nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer (NP) and control treatment (CK),were conducted to analysis effects of various fertilization on yield,economic efficiency,biomass and nutrient uptake of ‘Hongti’ grape with facility-delayed cultivation.The results showed that compared to PK and NP treatments,grape yield increased significantly with 16.6% and 120.0% under input 350 kg·hm-2 and 350 kg ·hm-2 treatments.However,grape yield could not still increase with fertilizer increased under 450 kg·hm-2 and 450 kg ·hm-2 treatments.Optimized fertilization treatment ensured the N,P and K demand for grape,and also improved the fruit ratio and the harvest index of N,P and K nutrient.The fruit ratio of OPT treatment was 48.6%,which was significantly higher than CK treatment with the value of 41.7%.The grape yield of OPT treatment was 16.2 t·hm-2,which increased significantly compared CK treatment by 11.8%.Meanwhile,the economic efficiency of OPT was 237 000 yuan with 29.5% higher than CK treatment.

References:

[1]潘峰,黄素平,李开军,等.配方施肥对葡萄品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2018(4):60-63.[2]周兴本.水肥配比对葡萄生长发育、氮代谢及水肥耦合效应的研究[M].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2015.[3]柴秀萍,张艳萍,张世成,等.不同施肥对酿造葡萄“蛇龙珠”果实产量和质量的影响[J].林业科技通讯,2018(10):65-66.[4]张杰,韩建,孙卓玲,等.滴灌施肥对红地球葡萄产量、品质及土体氮磷钾分布的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(3):124-134.[5]殷常青.高寒地区温室延后栽培葡萄调亏灌溉试验研究[M].西安:西安理工大学,2017.[6]马振朝,王嘉莹,庞新宇,等.河北省葡萄施肥现状及节能减排潜力分析[J].江苏农业科学,2018(5):143-147.[7]王敏,马小河,赵旗峰,等.山西产区葡萄园施肥现状、存在问题与对策建议[J].山西果树,2019(2):31-32.[8]孙聪伟,杨丽丽,陈展,等.施氮量对巨峰葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J].河北农业科学,2017(5):38-41.[9]张兴国,胡笑涛,冉辉,等.不同施肥处理对温室葡萄园土壤速效养分含量的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2018,36(11):129-134.[10]LI L,WANG R,JI L,et al.Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on beginning growth,yield and quality of wine grape[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,37:325-332.[11]康兴蓉,彭建伟,胡文峰,等.葡萄生产化肥控失增效研究进展[J].黑龙江农业科学,2019(4):145-150.[12]孙美,李栋梅,董业雯,等.养分供应量对玫瑰香葡萄矿质元素和水分吸收的影响[J].西北植物学报,2017(3):526-533.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-02-18