|Table of Contents|

Differences of Different Cultivation Methods and Different Densities of Hibiseu manihot L.

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年20
Page:
70-76
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Differences of Different Cultivation Methods and Different Densities of Hibiseu manihot L.
Author(s):
FAN Huitao; WEI Wenbin; WANG Yan; DU Chunshan; HUANG Jianming; ZHENG Zhixing
(Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Zhangjiakou，Hebei 075000)
Keywords:
Hibiseu manihot L.; cultivation mode; density; difference; gronomic characters; yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20194475
Abstract:
Hibiseu manihot L.was used as test material，two methods of transplanting and sowing were used to plant Hibiseu manihot L..By adjusting the planting distance and controlling the different density，the comparative study was carried out.Effects of different cultivation methods and densities on the growth of Hibiseu manihot L.were studied.The suitable cultivation method and density of Hibiseu manihot L.in Zhangjiakou were explored.The results showed that there was no significant difference in the effects of transplanting and sowing on the plant height，ground diameter，leaf size，flower size，flower yield and fresh weight yield of the flowering sunflower in Zhangjiakou.The yield and plant dry weight were only significantly different at the plant spacing of 35 cm and 60 cm，respectively，and there was no significant difference in other densities.It was indicated that the two cultivation methods of transplanting and sowing were more suitable for the growth of Hibiseu manihot L.in Zhangjiakou.The plant height of the flowering sunflower showed a decreasing trend with the increasing of plant spacing，and there were significant differences.The diameter of the Hibiseu manihot L.increases with the increase of the plant spacing.The diameters of the two cultivation methods were significantly different between 35 cm and 70 cm.The overall leaf size showed a slow increase with the increase of plant spacing，but there was no significant difference between different plant spacings.The flower size showed a slow upward trend with the increase of plant spacing.The size of the small plant spacing flower is significantly smaller than the large plant spacing.The dry weight and fresh weight yield of Hibiseu manihot L.flowers showed an upward trend with the plant spacing.The flower yield of 60-70 cm plant spacing has obvious advantages.The yield was increasing as the plant spacing increases.The argest yield of the plant was 70 cm，the smallest was 35 cm，and the change was more obvious.Except for the dry weight of the plant with a plant spacing of 60 cm，the dry weight yield and fresh weight yield of Hibiseu manihot L.were inversely proportional to the overall plant spacing，and were not significantly affected by density.

References:

[1]王文采.中国科学院“中国植物志”编辑委员会正式成立[J].科学通报,1959(22):772.[2]吴名全.珍稀植物:金花葵[J].现代园艺,2008(10):16-17.[3]杨旭辉,周剑武,刘曲,等.宁乡县金花葵高产栽培技术[J].中国农技推广,2017,33(12):34-35.[4]李杰,王玉丰,容静东,等.金花葵的营养价值与抗氧化活性[J].热带作物学报,2019,40(7):1354-1358.[5]雷波.金花葵总黄酮抑制酪氨酸酶活性的研究[J].宜春学院学报,2009,31(4):101-102.[6]杨秀松.金花葵粗黄酮提取物的免疫调节作用研究[J].中国药师,2013,16(9):1307-1311.[7]袁伯英.药食兼用花卉:菜芙蓉[J].农村实用科技信息,2008(1):23.[8]RUBIANG-YALAMBING L,ARCOT J,GREENFIELD H,et al.Aibika:Genetic variation，morphology and relationships to micronutrient composition[J].Food Chemistry,2016:193（15）：62-68.[9]唐晓清,王金羽,王宝华,等.金花葵引种及高产栽培试验[J].吉林农业,2018(15):88.[10]今科.“生命救心草”:株株山间立,迎风撒健康:珍稀植物金花葵药用价值得显现[J].今日科苑,2008(5):85-86.[11]梅洪睿.金花葵中提取生物活性物质的研究[D].大连:大连工业大学,2009.[12]兰蓉,李浡,刘卉,等.金花葵总黄酮的提取和含量测定[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(12):280-282.[13]马楠,郑鑫,杨虹,等.金花葵根部化学成分研究[J].沈阳药科大学学报,2018,35(12):1003-1006.[14]李浡,胡定煜,辛秀兰,等.原子光谱法测定金花葵花瓣及种子中微量元素[J].食品研究与开发,2012,33(4):152-155.[15]彭志兵,吴正平,喻华娟.金花葵籽油中脂肪酸组成的GC-MS分析[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(34):16753-16756.[16]李时珍.本草纲目(草部第十六)[M].北京:中国书店,2013.[17]李俊采,张兴国,何欢,等.不同处理方法及不同部位的金花葵红外光谱研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2016,34(3):597-600.[18]史刚荣.黄蜀葵的研究进展[J].中国野生植物资源,2003(6):8-9.[19]马楠,郑鑫,杨虹,等.金花葵根部化学成分研究[J].沈阳药科大学学报，2018,35(12):1003-1006.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-01-08