|Table of Contents|

Adaptability of Limestone Mine Environmental Cultivation of Six Kinds of Vine Plants in Hebei Province

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年17
Page:
74-79
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Adaptability of Limestone Mine Environmental Cultivation of Six Kinds of Vine Plants in Hebei Province
Author(s):
CAO He1; YANG Xinbing1; LIU Yuguang2; CHEN Yifan2; LI Yuhong3; FU Yongshe3
(1.College of Forestry,Hebei Agricultural University,Baoding,Hebei 071000;2.Landscape Architecture and Tourism,Hebei Agricultural University,Baoding,Hebei 071000;3.Land and Resources Exploration Center of Hebei Geological and Mineral Bureau,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050000)
Keywords:
functional traits; vines; principal component analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20193379
Abstract:
Six kinds of vine plants,such as Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Sieb.et Zucc.) Planch,Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch,Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi,Campsis grandiflora (Thunb.) Loisel,Wisteria sinensis (Sims) Sweet)and Celastrusorbiculatus Thunb,were used as test materials.Using principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation method.Ten plant functional traits,such as survival rate,new branch length,new branch diameter,leaf fresh weight,leaf thickness,leaf area,leaf dry weight,leaf relative water content,leaf dry matter content and specific leaf area,were studied.Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 6 species of vines were carried out.It was expected to provide a basis for vertical greening of abandoned mines and high steep slope cliffs.The results showed that there were significant differences in functional traits among 6 species of vines.Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Sieb.et Zucc.) Planch,Pueraria lobata(Willd.)Ohwi,Wisteria sinensis (Sims) Sweet and Campsis grandiflora (Thunb.) Loisel belong to ‘fast investment-income’ plants.Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planche and Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb belonged to ‘slow investment-income’ plant.Six main functional traits were selected by principal component analysis SR,FW,DW,RWC,LDMC,NBT.SR,FW and DW were the first principal components.RWC and LDMC were the second principal component,and NBT was the third principal component.Six species of vines were planted in abandoned mine environments,the order of adaptability score was as follows Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb (9.67)>Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch (6.76)>Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi (5.95)>Campsis grandiflora (Thunb.) Loisel (5.72)>Wisteria sinensis (Sims) Sweet (4.20)>Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Sieb.et Zucc.) Planch (-0.03).

References:

[1]于华远.矿山开发的地质灾害及环境保护土地复垦研究[J].科技创新与应用,2019(13):87-88.[2]范雪婷,赵朝贺,潘九宝,等.矿山地质环境及治理恢复现状的调查与评价:以任楼矿区为例[J].资源与产业,2018,20(6):47-51.[3]关军洪,郝培尧,董丽,李雄.矿山废弃地生态修复研究进展[J].生态科学,2017,36(2):193-200.[4]赵阳.典型矿山生态恢复效果与生态效益评价[D].焦作:河南理工大学,2017.[5]朱紫微.生态恢复理念下废弃矿山景观重塑设计问题研究[D].秦皇岛:燕山大学,2017.[6]SIMONI B S D,LEI T E M G P.Assessment of rehabilitation projects results of a gold mine area using landscape functionanalysis[J].Applied Geography,2019,108(7):22-29.[7]宫彦章,郑卫国,张转转.采石场岩质边坡生态恢复技术[J].现代园艺,2016(7):143-144[8]岳鹏飞.岩质陡坡防护与绿化复合结构研究[J].铁道工程学报,2015,32(12):25-29.[9]RONZHINA D A,IVANOVA L A,IVANOV L A.Leaf functional traits and biomass of wetland plants in forest and steppe zones[J].Russian Journal of Plant Physiology,2019,66(3):393-402.[10]DIAZ S,HODGSON J G,THOMPOSON K.The piant traits that drive ecosystems:Evidence from three continents[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2004,15:295-304.[11]孟婷婷,倪健,王国宏.植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J].植物生态学报,2007(1):150-165.[12]CRAINE J M,REICH P B,TILMAN G D,et al.The role of plant species in biomass production and response to elevated CO2and N[J].Ecology Letters,2003,6(7):623-625.[13]张增可,郑心炫,林华贞,等.海岛植物不同演替阶段植物功能性状与环境因子的变化规律[J].生态学报,2019,39(10):3749-3758.[14]朱济友,于强,刘亚培,等.植物功能性状及其叶经济谱对城市热环境的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2018,40(9):72-81.[15]岳喜元,左小安,庾强,等.降水量和短期极端干旱对典型草原植物群落及优势种羊草(Leymus chinensis)叶性状的影响[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(5):1009-1016.[16]WRIGHT I J,REICH P B,WESTOBY M,et al.The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J].Nature,2004,428(6985):821-823.[17]MILLA R,REICH P B.The scaling of leaf area and mass:the cost of light interception increases with leaf size[J].Proc Biol Sci,2007,274(1622):2109-2114.[18]孙梅,田昆,张贇,等.植物叶片功能性状及其环境适应研究[J].植物科学学报,2017,35(6):940-949.[19]王晓帆,冯嘉仪,翁殊斐,等.热带园林4种木质藤本植物叶性状与环境适应能力研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2019,39(3):166-171.[20]刘丙花,孙锐,王开芳,等.不同蓝莓品种果实品质比较与综合评价[J].食品科学,2019,40(1):78-84.[21]张路遥,马祖陆,覃星铭.主成分分析和因子分析在岩溶水水化学特征研究中的应用[J].广西科学院学报,2019(7):1-7.[22]胡梦瑶,张林,罗天祥,等.西藏紫花针茅叶功能性状沿降水梯度的变化[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(2):136-143.[23]李峰.昆明西山半湿润常绿阔叶林木本植物功能性状的比较研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2011.[24]张中瑞.氮-水复合干扰下不同功能型植物幼苗资源权衡策略研究[D].福州:福建师范大学,2017.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-12-01