|Table of Contents|

Effects of Reduction and Replacement Policy on Net Income of Growers′ Facility Vegetables

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2020年10
Page:
157-164
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Reduction and Replacement Policy on Net Income of Growers′ Facility Vegetables
Author(s):
DING Xiaodong1WANG Guixia12YANG Xuetao1
(1.School of Economics and Management,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun,Jilin 130118;2.Food Research Center,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun,Jilin 130118)
Keywords:
reduction and replacement policyhousehold vegetable growersnet income per unit area of facility vegetablesdifference in difference model
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20193284
Abstract:
In recent years,great progress had been made in the research on reduction and replacement policy for chemical fertilizer,which had a positive impact on farmers′ chemical fertilizer reduction behavior,and also played a role in increasing income.This study was based on the survey data from 168 household vegetable growers in the central and western regions of Liaoning Province,in the use of method of difference in difference model to analyze the basic characteristics of the grower and the characteristics of the family′s production and operation.The results showed that after the implementation of the reduction and replacement policy,the net income per unit area of facility vegetables in pilot county was significantly higher than those of non-pilot county growers.The research results of difference in difference measurement model further validates the results of univariate analyses.Judging from the results of the evaluation of the policy effects,the reduction and replacement policy has promoted the reduction of fertilizer application in China to a certain extent.

References:

[1]中华人民共和国统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2015-2017.[2]曾衍德.农业绿色发展:供需结构改革的共同追求[N].学习时报,2017-11-27(006).[3]金书秦,张惠,吴娜伟.2016年化肥、农药零增长行动实施结果评估[J].环境保护,2018,46(1):45-49.[4]金书秦,张惠,付饶,等.化肥零增长行动实施状况中期评估[J].环境保护,2019,47(2):39-43.[5]程兆东,王永刚,康怀启,等.新时代化肥使用量零增长行动措施和实施效果[J].农业工程,2018,8(7):49-53.[6]杨钰蓉,罗小锋.减量替代政策对农户有机肥替代技术模式采纳的影响:基于湖北省茶叶种植户调查数据的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2018(10):77-85.[7]朱利群,王珏,王春杰,等.有机肥和化肥配施技术农户采纳意愿影响因素分析:基于苏、浙、皖三省农户调查[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(3):671-679.[8]黄炎忠,罗小锋,刘迪,等.农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素:对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):632-641.[9]徐大兵,赵书军,袁家富,等.有机肥替代氮化肥对叶菜产量品质和土壤氮淋失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(S1):13-18.[10]谢勇,赵易艺,张玉平,等.南方丘陵地区生物黑炭和有机肥配施化肥的应用研究[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(4):197-203,215.[11]谷端银,焦娟,刘中良,等.减施化肥配施有机肥对大拱棚早春西瓜生长及品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2019(23):48-56.[12]伊晓云,马立锋,石元值,等.茶园有机肥使用和有机肥替代化肥技术[J].中国茶叶,2018,40(6):10-13.[13]温延臣,张曰东,袁亮,等.商品有机肥替代化肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(11):2136-2142.[14]周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计[J].经济研究,2005(8):44-53.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-07-26