|Table of Contents|

Evaluation on the Nutritional Value of Protein in the Fruiting Bodies ofDictyophora indusiata Cultivated by JUNCAO

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2019年17
Page:
133-139
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation on the Nutritional Value of Protein in the Fruiting Bodies ofDictyophora indusiata Cultivated by JUNCAO
Author(s):
SU Dewei1; SONG Feifei2; LIN Hui1; SU Guanfeng3; LUO Hailing1; LIN Zhanxi1
(1.China National Engineering Research Center of JUNCAO Technology，Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University，Fuzhou，Fujian 350002；2.Fujian Institute of Biological Engineering，Fuzhou，Fujian 350002；3.Shouguang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine，Weifang，Shandong 262700)
Keywords:
JUNCAO; Dictyophora indusiata; protein; amino acid; nutritional value
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20190762
Abstract:
The nutritional ingredients of Dictyophora indusiata cultivated by JUNCAO (which cultivated by bamboo sawdust were kept as control) in Taining and Shunchang were studied according to International Universal Methods.In addition，the nutritional value of protein in fruiting body was evaluated.The results showed that，for JUNCAO D.indusiata produced in two areas，the crude protein content of 22.79% and 24.01% (which were higher than that of bamboo D.indusiata in 18.53% and 19.47%)，the crude fat content of 1.88% and 2.01% (which were lower than 2.23% and 2.38% of bamboo D.indusiata)，and total amino acids of 15.44 g?（100g）-1 and 16.27 g?（100g）-1 (which were higher than 10.83 g?（100g）-1 and 11.38 g?（100g）-1 of bamboo D.indusiata) were detected respectively.According to the nutritional value evaluation of JUNCAO D.indusiata，it was found that the amino acid score (AAS) and chemical scores(CS) were lower than that of bamboo D.indusiata.However，the first limited amino acids were methionine and cystein，which were same as that of bamboo D.indusiata.In addition，the essential amino acid index (EAAI)，biological value (BV)，nutritional index (NI)，essential amino acid relative ratio (EAARR) were all higher than bamboo D.indusiata.For the score of ratio coefficient of amino acid (SRCAA)，JUNCAO D.indusiata cultivated in Tainning County was higher than bamboo D.indusiata，while which cultivated in Shunchang County was on the contrary.By using the fuzzy discernment method，the closeness degrees of JUNCAO D.indusiata to egg protein was 0.82 and 0.80 respectively，higher than 0.79 and 0.78 in bamboo D.indusiata.The research showed that JUNCAO D.indusiata has higher nutritional value with higher protein，lower fat content and many varieties of carbohydrates and mineral elements.

References:

[1]朱利泉,邓艳霞.竹荪的研究与利用[J].中国野生植物资源,2000,19(3)：21-23.[2]黄年来.中国食用菌百科[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1993.[3]黄惠芳,覃婵.露天生料栽培竹荪技术及其产量分析[J].广西热带农业，2007(1)：28-29.[4]林陈强,曹萌，陈济琛,等.棘托竹荪菌盖营养成分分析与评价[J].热带作物学报,2016,37(11)：2089-2093.[5]徐方.食用真菌的药用价值[J].宁夏医学院学报,1990,12(1)：46-48.[6]杨海龙，李伟.短裙竹荪多糖清除O?[TX-*4]2及对人红细胞膜自由基氧化的影响[J].科技通讯,2000,16(5)：371-373.[7]刘虎成,齐冬梅,宋大安.竹荪饮料降血压功能的初步实验[J].广州食品工业科技,2000(2)：40-44.[8]林占熺.菌草学[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2009.[9]薛志香.新鲜菌草栽培香菇、紫孢平菇的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学，2012.[10]战琨友.菌草香菇培养基的筛选及与木屑香菇品质的比较研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2003.[11]蔡杨星.菌草猴头菌栽培工艺、营养成分及其多糖的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[12]曹秀明.菌草栽培灰树花基本营养成分分析及其多糖的分离纯化[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[13]黄玉琴.菌草栽培银耳工艺的研究与应用[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[14]李娜.紫芝菌草栽培特性、化学成分及其多糖的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2011.[15]张双双.菌草灵芝菌糟及其水提物在奶牛饲养中的应用研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[16]郑丹.鲜菌草灵芝菌丝发酵菌质作为奶牛饲料免疫添加剂的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2013.[17]陈锦华.菌草灵芝菌糟提取工艺研究及提取物在奶牛饲料中的应用[D].福州:福建农林大学,2013.[18]陈晓斌.菌草栽培杏鲍菇及其菌糟作为饲料的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[19]中华人民共和国卫生部.GB/T 5009.3-2010食品中水分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.[20]中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局.GB 5009.4-2016食用菌中灰分测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.[21]中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 15672-2009食用菌中总糖含量的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.[22]中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局.GB 5009.5-2016食用菌中粗蛋白含量的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.[23]中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局.GB 5009.6-2016食用菌中粗脂肪含量的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.[24]中华人民共和国卫生部.GB 5009.124-2016食品中氨基酸的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2003.[25]BANO Z,RAJARATHRAM S.Pleurotus mushroom as a nutritions food[M].Hong Kong：The Hong Kong University Press,1982：363-380.[26]Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Amino acid content of foods and biological data on proteins[J].Nutritional Studies,1970,24：5-6.[27]赵建幸.蛋白质营养评价新方法的研究-必需氨基酸相对比值法[J].食品工业,1991(5)：38-40.[28]朱圣陶,吴坤.蛋白质营养价值评价：氨基酸比值系数法[J].营养学报,1988,10(2)：187-190.[29]马璐,林衍铨,应正河,等.广叶绣球菌菌丝体与子实体蛋白质营养价值评价[J].食品科学,2016,37(5)：214-218.[30]PELLET P I,YOUNG V R.Nutritional Evaluation of Protein Foods[M].Tokyo:The United National University Publishing Company,1980.[31]罗正明,刘秀丽,贾艳青,等.四种五台山野生食用菌蛋白质营养价值评价[J].食品工业科技,2015,36(2)：349-354.[32]林陈强,曹萌，陈济琛,等.棘托竹荪菌盖营养成分分析与评价[J].热带作物学报,2016,37(11):2089-2093.[33]OSER B L.Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation of protein[J].J Am Diet Assoc,1951,27:396-402.[34]OSER B L.An integrated essential amino acid index for predicting the biological value of protein//Protein and amino acid nutrition[M].New York:Academic Press,1959：281-295.[35]张登友,杨树德,董洪新,等.4种金福菇菌株子实体的蛋白质营养价值评价[J].生物加工过程,2017,15(4)：22-27.[36]孙晓红,赵宏强,蓝蔚青,等.棘托竹荪提取物对副溶血性弧菌的抑菌作用机制[J].中国食品学报,2017,17(3)：260-267.[37]蓝蔚青,曹奕,陈燕,等.棘托竹荪提取液对单增李斯特菌的抑菌机理初步研究[J].食品工业科技,2015,36(14)：152-155,160.[38]宋飞飞,尤洁,王倩雯,等.不同溶剂提取菌草竹荪抑菌活性物质的初步研究[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(4):95-98.[39]林陈强,林戎斌,陈济琛,等.棘托竹荪菌托抑菌物质提取、分离及活性组分[J].天然产物研究与开发,2015（27）:1910-1916.[40]苏德伟.菌草栽培竹荪及其品质的研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.[41]王娟娟,吴林秀,陈艺煊,等.不同提取方法对竹荪提取液抗氧化活性的影响研究[J].食品科技,2017,42(5)：225-229.[42]韩乐,冯娜,冯杰,等.棘托竹荪液态深层发酵水提物和不同浓度乙醇提取物的抗氧化活性及化学成分分析[J].食用菌学报,2014,21(4)：53-57.[43]敢小双,熊晨阳,刘光荣,等.竹荪多糖提取工艺及其抗氧化性[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(13)：223-226.[44]吴林秀,胡荣康,陈艺煊,等.竹荪中多酚提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性研究[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(7)：203-206,215.[45]林陈强,林戎斌,陈济琛,等.棘托竹荪菌盖提取物的抗氧化活性[J].食用菌学报,2013,20(2)：32-36.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-09-24