|Table of Contents|

Effects of Canopy Height on Canopy Microclimate and Quality of‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Grape

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2018年01
Page:
57-61
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Canopy Height on Canopy Microclimate and Quality of‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Grape
Author(s):
WU Zhijun1TIAN Limin2ZUO Junwei1LIU Si1ZHANG Junxiang1
1.College of Agriculture,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021;2.Wine College,Ningxia University,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021
Keywords:
canopy heightmicroclimatequality of wine grape
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20171714
Abstract:
‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape was used as test material.Three levels of single factor were designed to study the effects of canopy height on canopy microclimate and quality of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape,in order to offer the theoretical material with technical parameters of superior grape producing and cultivation on the east foot of Helan Mountain.The results showed that the illumination of the canopy inlayer on different height treatment was 1.2 m>1.5 m>1.8 m (refered to the canopy height,the same as below);the average daily temperature range in a month on different height treatment during maturation was 1.2 m>1.5 m>1.8 m.Different treatments of canopy height made little effect on total sugar content and pH,the total acid content went down as the canopy heights rose.Tannin content in wine of different treatments was 1.5 m>1.2 m>1.8 m,and the treatment of 1.5 m was higher than 1.2 m with the value of 200 mg?L-1,while higher than 1.8 m with the value of 230 mg?L-1;total phenol content in wine of different treatments was 1.2 m>1.5 m>1.8 m,the anthocyanin content was 1.5 m>1.2 m>1.8 m.To sum up the trait analysis of canopy height,grape and wine,it coudl be better to improve the quality of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grape and wine with the canopy height of 1.5 m,and could be generalized in Ningxia.

References:

[1]张大鹏.葡萄叶幕微气候的研究方法与技术[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,1992(3):1-5.

[2]王玉蓉.不同栽植密度杏园微气候特征研究[J].新疆农业大学,2014(5):25.
[3]CARBONNEAU A,LEBON E,MABROUK H,et al.Interactions ‘canopy shape×vigour level’:consequences on architecture and microclimate of the grapevine[J].International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology,2000(5):37-42.
[4]HASELGROVE L,BOTTING D.Canopy microclimate and berry composition:The effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L.cv.Shiraz grape berries[J].Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,2008,6(2):141-149.
[5]de GABRIELLA L,LAURA R.Anthocyanin biosynthesis during berry development in corvina grap[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2016(5):74-80.
[6]张大鹏,姜红英,许雪峰.葡萄不同栽培方式的叶幕微气候、光合作用和水分生理效应[J].园艺学报,1994(2):105-113.
[7]王艺,韦小丽.不同光照对植物生长、生理生化和形态结构影响的研究进展[J].山地农业生物学报,2010(4):353-359.
[8]高飞,柯燚,金韬,等.光照对植物合成花色素苷的影响研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(34):6-10.
[9]柯燚,高飞,金韬,等.温度对植物花青素苷合成影响研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(19):101-105.
[10]孙晔,张军翔.叶幕微气候对酿酒葡萄品质影响研究进展[J].广东农业科学,2014(10):30-33.
[11]张大鹏,娄成后.北京地区葡萄三种主要栽培方式的叶幕微气候和植物水分关系的研究[J].中国农业科学,1990,23(2):73-82.
[12]王华.葡萄酒分析检验[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011:125-155.
[13]韩舜愈,祝霞.单一pH法、pH示差法和差减法快速测定干红葡萄酒中总花色苷含量的比较[J].食品工业科技,2012(23):323-325.
[14]张晓伟.光照对果树生理生化的影响及其利用[J].防护林科技,2015(1):73-76.
[15]潘照明.光照与葡萄品质[J].植物杂志,1992(2):32-33.
[16]周仁喜,郑华平.关于温度对甜菜同化产物分配和糖分代谢影响的研究[J].中国甜菜糖业,1983(4):24-33.
[17]郭孟平.葡萄浆果及葡萄酒中酸度参数的意义[J].葡萄栽培与酿酒,1993(2):38-40.
[18]牛雪,张军翔,徐国前.葡萄与葡萄酒中总酚测定方法的研究进展[J].食品与机械,2016(3):239-242.
[19]张峰玮.“厂”字整形下不同负载量对葡萄果实和葡萄酒品质的影响[D].银川:宁夏大学,2016.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-01-12