|Table of Contents|

Effect of Different Seed Coating on Control Disease and  Yield at Seedling Stage of Tomato(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年09
Page:
111-115
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effect of Different Seed Coating on Control Disease and  Yield at Seedling Stage of Tomato
Author(s):
LI Jin1; 2; LI Jie1; DUAN Junjie1; TANG Yanling3; LEI Bin1; 2
(1.Xinjiang Oasis Agricultural Science and Technology Co.Ltd.，Urumqi,Xinjiang 830091;2.Research Institute of Nuclear Technology of Biotechnology，Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences，Urumqi,Xinjiang 830091;3.College of Agriculture,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052)
Keywords:
tomato; seed coating; seedling disease; growth; yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201709024
Abstract:
In order to screen out suitable seed coating agents for tomato production in Xinjiang and provide a theoretical basis for high yield cultivation of tomato，the effect of different(seed coating treatment seed coating of tomato No.6,No.7,No.8,No.9 and No.10) on the control of damping off，Rhizoctonia solani and yield of tomato ‘Tianfen No.2’ was investigated.The results showed that all the five seed coating treatments increased the germination rate，germination energy and germination index of tomato，and the plant height，root length，stem diameter，fresh weight，dry weight also increased diversely compared with the control treatment.The seed coating No.9 treatment had the most significant effect.Different seed coating treatments could significantly control the tomato seedling diseases such as damping off and Rhizoctonia solani，and the control effect were 71.51%-84.38%，72.03%-84.73%，respectively;the seed coating No.9 treatment had the best control effect on Rhizoctonia solani，the control effect was 84.38%;the seed coating No.10 treatment had the best control effect on damping off，the control effect was 84.73%.All the seed coating treatments significantly improved the tomato yield，and the seed coating No.9 treatment had the most significant difference compared with that in the control treatment，the 667 m2 yield was 13.1 t.So the tomato seed coating No.9 treatment had the best effect.

References:

 

[1]ILAHY R,HDIDER C，LENUCCI M S,et al.Antioxidant activity and bioactive compound changes during fruit ripening of high-lycopene tomato cultivars[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2011（24）:588-595.

[2]梁梅,周蓉,邹滔,等.番茄农艺性状与果实主要营养成分相关性分析[J].西北农业学报,2013,22(5):91-100.

[3]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2015:376-381．

[4]赵思峰,廖依学,王昌,等.新疆加工番茄病虫草害发生概况及综合防治技术[J].新疆农业科学，2004，41(5):274-276.

[5]匡开源,王冬生,袁永达,等.现代温室番茄主要病虫害发生与防治[J].上海农业学报，2000(16):6-9.

[6]蒋淑芝,张志斌,张真和.灌注热水消毒法防治设施蔬菜土传病虫害技术考察[J].中国蔬菜，2005(9):41.

[7]连青龙,张跃峰,丁小明,等.我国北方设施蔬菜质量安全现状与问题分析[J].中国蔬菜,2016(7):15-21.

[8]依德萍,李贞姬,赵丽莉,等.不同种衣剂对桔梗种子发芽率及幼苗质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2013(18):148-150.

[9]宋顺华,郑晓鹰,李秀清.吡虫啉种衣剂对蔬菜种子质量的影响[J].北方园艺,2010(12):37-39.

[10]陈鹏,王娟,丁方丽,等.不同种衣剂对白菜生长及其根际土壤微生态的影响[J].北方园艺,2016(3):169-173.

[11]刘同金,李瑞娟,于建垒,等.8%氟虫腈悬浮种衣剂在玉米和土壤中的残留研究及安全评价[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(22):251-257.

[12]李淑,袁会珠,闫晓静,等.三唑酮种子包衣对冬小麦种子萌发和幼芽抗逆因子的影响[J].农药学学报，2014,16(1):14-22.

[13]李进,段俊杰,努尔买买提·努尔合加,等.3种衣剂对棉花幼苗生长及抗寒能力的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2015,52(11):1997-2003.

[14]甘中祥,张勇.加工番茄测产方法研究[J].新疆农业科学,2008，45(S1):111-114.

[15]付艳,巩毅刚.蔬菜种衣剂的研究与应用综述[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(12):211-214.

[16]王锋,高仁君,李健强,等.噁醚唑种衣剂对小麦幼苗生长及抗病性相关酶活性的影响[J].植物病理学报,2000,30(3):213-216.

[17]张娟,徐宁彤,曲琪环,等.中药-壳聚糖复合种衣剂对大豆苗期生理的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2009,40(3):40-43.

[18]张静,程智慧,孟焕文,等.多效唑包衣处理对番茄种子活力和幼苗质量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2007,35(9):161-166.

[19]李薇,徐宁彤,曲琪环,等.不同种衣剂对玉米种子活力和幼苗生理指标的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2008,39(12):1-4.

[20]张政兵,刘勇,郭海明,等.15%蔬菜种衣剂处理对辣椒的促生作用研究[J].广西农业科学,2007,38(1):55-57.

[21]程智慧,张静,孟焕文.杀菌剂包衣种子对番茄苗期2种病害的防治效果[J].华中农业大学学报,2008,27(4):460-463.

[22]何忠全,何明,彭化贤,等.药肥复合型棉花种衣剂防病增产效果测定[J].西南农业学报,1999,12(2):97-102.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-17