|Table of Contents|

Effects of Solid Microbial Agents on Growth and Yield of Tomato(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2017年08
Page:
179-182
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Solid Microbial Agents on Growth and Yield of Tomato
Author(s):
FANG Xuedan12GENG Liping12XIE Jianzhi12MA Li3LIU Wenju12LI Bowen12
(1.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding,Hebei 071001;2.Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-environment,Baoding,Hebei 071001;3.Yongqing Vegetable Administration,Langfang,Hebei 065600)
Keywords:
:tomatomicrobial inoculantscommodity ratetomato yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201708041
Abstract:
Tomato ‘Meiluodi’ was used as experimental material,the tomato plant height,single fruit weight,fruit number per plant,commodity rate and the yield of the tomato of microbial inoculants in greenhouse were studied.The results showed that adding solid microbial inoculants could promote tomato growth,increase tomato commodity rate,fruit number per plant and the single fruit weight,raise commodity rate and output of tomato,in the greenhouse those were more higher than conventional fertilization and added the same amount of matrix.The tomato height of A1(conventional fertilization),A2(conventional fertilization plus solid microbial agents) and A3(conventional fertilization plus equal amount matrix) compared with CK(no fertilizer control) were increased by 1.69%,3.60% and 1.91%.The average commodity rate A2 reached 92.60%,increased by 1.19% and 0.88%,compared with A1 and A3 were significant difference(P<0.05).Compared with CK,the yield of A1,A2 and A3 increased 1 209.83 kg,1 454.34 kg and 1 253.07 kg each 667 m2 and increased by 34.05%,40.94% and 35.27%,respectively.The difference were extremely significant(P<0.01).The yield of A2 was the most prominent,the average yield in each 667 m2 reached 5 006.95 kg,for A1 and A3 increased by 5.13% and 4.19% and the difference were extremely significant(P<0.01).

References:

 

[1]河北蔬菜种植基地分布情况()[EB/OL].(2015-11-03)[2016-03-01].http://www.hebchina.com/bencandy.php?fid-297-id-24096-page-1.htm.

[2]2014年河北省蔬菜生产形势分析[EB/OL].(2015-4-29)[2016-03-01].http://www.hetj.gov.cn/hetj/tjfx/101430190249479.html.

[3]聂承华,宋建新.河北省主要蔬菜种植现状[J].中国蔬菜,2008(4):10-11.

[4]CHROEDER H A,BALASSA J J.Cadmium:Uptake by vegetables from superphosphate in soil[J].Science,1963,140(3568):819-20.

[5]沈景文.化肥农药和污灌对地下水的污染[J].农业环境科学学报,1992(3):137-139.

[6]郭晖.化肥农药对环境污染与防治[J].农民致富之友,2011(14):54-54.

[7]黄国勤,王兴祥,钱海燕,.施用化肥对农业生态环境的负面影响及对策[J].生态环境,2004,13(4):656-660.

[8]逢焕成,李玉义,严慧峻,.微生物菌剂对盐碱土理化和生物性状影响的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(5):951-955.

[9]祁红英,李师默,王其传,.几种微生物菌剂对辣椒混合性土传病害的田间防效试验[J].长江蔬菜,2013(20):66-69.

[10]朱金英.微生物菌剂在设施黄瓜和番茄上的应用效果研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2014.

[11]葛诚,吴薇.我国微生物肥料的生产、应用及问题[J].中国农学通报,1994(3):24-28.

[12]于彩虹,许前欣.生物菌肥对蔬菜品质的影响[J].天津农业科学,2000,6(2):20-22.

[13]占新华,蒋延惠.微生物制剂促进植物生长机理的研究进展[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1999(2):97-105.

[14]王素英,陶光灿,谢光辉,.我国微生物肥料的应用研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2003,8(1):14-18.

[15]李博文.蔬菜安全高效施肥[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2014.

[16]孔跃.生物有机肥对番茄及小白菜生长与品质影响效应的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-08