|Table of Contents|

Study on Photosynthetic and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Three Kinds of Organic Vegetables(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2015年12
Page:
10-14
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Photosynthetic and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Three Kinds of Organic Vegetables
Author(s):
ZHANG Jinmeng 1JIANG Hong 12WU Danna1LIU Yuli1SUN Wenwen1MA Jinli1
1.International Ecological Research Center,Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 311300;2.International Earth System Scientific Institute,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210093
Keywords:
organic farmingcucumbertomatoasparagus beanphotosynthetic characteristicschlorophyll fluorescencethe relative chlorophyll content
PACS:
S 642.2;S 641.2
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.201512003
Abstract:
Organic farming is an important kind of cultivation under the guidance of ecology theory.Nonetheless there is lack of the further research about its mechanism.The photosynthetic capability of cucumber,asparagus bean and tomato in the fruiting period were studied,as they were grown in normative organic horticulture.Photosynthetic characteristics,chlorophyll fluorescence and the relative chlorophyll content were compared between cucumber,asparagus bean and tomato under same organic growing conditions.The results showed that the value of the relative chlorophyll content of the three vegetables’leaves was asparagus bean>cucumber>tomato.The corresponding of Pn/Tr/Gs of the three organic vegetables to light intensity was asparagus bean>cucumber>tomato.The value of fit Pnmax and LSP was cucumber>asparagus bean>tomato.The value of AQELCP and Rd was asparagus bean>cucumber>tomato.The value of Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo was cucumber>asparagus bean>tomato.Based on the above results,it showed that the photosynthetic capability of the organic cucumber and asparagus were stronger than tomato’s.

References:

[1]Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO),World Health Organization (WHO).Guidelines for the production,processing,labeling and marketing of organically produced foods (GL321999/2001)[S].Codex Alimentations,2001:5-11.ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/standard/organic/gl99_32e.pdf.[2]马世铭,Sauerborn J.世界有机农业发展的历史回顾与发展动态[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(10):1510-1516.[3]刘月仙,吴文良,蔡新颜.有机农业发展的低碳机理分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):441-446.[4] 张福墁,马国成.日光温室不同季节的生态环境对黄瓜光合作用的影响[J].华北农学报,1995,10(1):70-75.[5]马德华,庞金安,霍振荣,等.环境因素对黄瓜幼苗光合特性的影响[J].华北农学报,1997,12(4):97-100.[6]徐克章,史跃林,许贵民,等.保护地黄瓜叶片光合作用温度特性的研究[J].园艺学报,1993,20(1):51-55.[7]罗新兰,李天来,姚运生,等.日光温室气象要素及番茄单叶光合速率日变化模拟的研究[J].园艺学报,2004,3(5):607-612.[8]郭泳,李天来,黄广学,等.环境因素对番茄单叶净光合速率的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1998,29(2):127-131.[9]罗新兰,李天来,李国春,等.日光温室番茄叶片净光合速率与气象因子的关系[J].江苏农业科学,2007(4):89-92.[10]史为民,陈青云,乔晓军.日光温室黄瓜叶片光合速率模型及其参数确定的初步研究[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(5):113-118.[11]丁兆堂,卢育华,徐坤.环境因子对番茄光合特性的影响[J[.山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(3):356-360.[12]王立河,孙新征,赵喜茹,等.有机肥与氮肥配施对日光温室黄瓜产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(11):237-242.[13]李吉进,宋东涛,邹国元,等.不同有机肥料对番茄生长及品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(10):300-305.[14]赵会杰,邹琦,于振文.叶绿素荧光分析技术及其在植物光合机理研究中的应用[J].河南农业大学学报,2000,34(3):248-251.[15]艾天成,李方敏,周治安,等.作物叶片叶绿素含量与SPAD值相关性研究[J].湖北农学院学报,2000,20(1):6-8.[16]王磊,任树梅,毕勇刚,等.土壤水分及有机肥料对番茄叶片光合特性及叶绿素含量影响的实验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2004,23(2):66-68. [17]傅家瑞,宋松泉,黄上志,等.植物生理学[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1998.[18]刘悦秋,孙向阳,王勇,等.遮荫对异株荨麻光合特性和荧光参数的影响[J].生态学报,2007,27(8):3457-3464.[9]Krause G H,Weis E.Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis:The basics.Annu.Rev.Plant Physiol[J].Plant Mol Biol,1991,43:313-349.[20]卢育华,申玉梅,陈莉平.黄瓜单个叶片光合特性研究[J].园艺学报,1994,21(1):54-58.[21]曹丹,宗良纲,肖峻,等.生物肥对有机黄瓜生长及土壤学特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(10):2587-2592.[22]韦泽秀.水肥对大棚黄瓜和番茄生理特性及土壤环境的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2009.[23]朱延姝,樊金娟,冯辉.弱光胁迫对不同生育期番茄光合特性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3141-3146.[24]陈凯利,李建明,贺会强,等.水分对番茄不同叶龄叶片光合作用的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(16):4919-4929.[25]艾希珍,马兴庄,玉立明,等.日光温室黄瓜叶片展开过程中光合特性的变化[J].中国农业学报,2005,38(3):558-564.[26]艾希珍,张振贤,何启伟,等.日光温室黄瓜不同叶位叶片光合作用研究[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(12):1519-1524.[27]胡志辉,陈禅友.豇豆光合特性研究[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(3):76-78.[28]林碧英,张瑜,林义章.不同光质对豇豆幼苗光合特性和若干生理生化指标的影响[J].热带作物学报,2011,32(2):235-239.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2015-08-08