|Table of Contents|

Study on Differences of Antimicrobial Effect and Dynamics Changes in Rosa rugosa Cultivars(PDF)

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2012年10期
Page:
78-81
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Differences of Antimicrobial Effect and Dynamics Changes in Rosa rugosa Cultivars
Author(s):
XU YanFENG ZhenZHAO Lan-yong
College of Forestry,Shandong Agricultural University,Tai’an,Shandong 271018
Keywords:
Rosa rugosa Thunb. fresh petal volatiles antimicrobial rate
PACS:
S 685.12
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Inhibitory effects of volatile compounds from fresh petals of Rosa rugosa ‘Zifurong’,R.rugosa ‘Saixizi’,R.rugosa ‘Xizi’,R.rugosa ‘Purple Branch’,R.rugosa ‘Puce Dragon’ 5 Rosa rugosa cultivars were investigated on bacteria and fungi in the air.The results showed that the 5 Rosa rugosa cultivars exerted inhibitory effects on bacteria and fungi differently.The analysis indicated that the ability of inhibiting the growth of bacteria and fungi had highly significant differences among the 5 Rosa rugosa cultivars(F=8.615,P=0.0001),and 3 different bloom stages(F=5.871,P=0.0071).The 5 Rosa rugosa cultivars investigated all possessed inhibitory effect and the effect of R.rugosa ‘Purple Branch’ was the best and changed less in the whole bloom season than others.The antibacterial rate had highly significant differences among the 5 Rosa rugosa cultivars(F=13.405,P=0.0001),and 3 different bloom stages(F=6.512,P=0.0045).Among the 5 cultivars,R.rugosa ‘Purple Branch’,R.rugosa‘Xizi’ and R.rugosa‘Zifurong’ had stronger antibacterial activity in the whole bloom season.The differences of the antifungal rate among the 5 cultivars and 3 different bloom stages were not significant.In fully bloom stage,R.rugosa‘Purple Branch’,R.rugosa‘Puce Dragon’ and R.rugosa‘Zifurong’ were found most effective in inhibiting bacteria,while with R.rugosa‘Purple Branch’ and R.rugosa‘Saixizi’ in fungi.

References:

[1]吴承顺,汪沂,赵德修,等.玫瑰芳香油主要化学成分研究[J].植物学报,1985,27(5):510-515.
[2]Hasan B,Nilgün G B.The effects of harvest date,fermentation duration and tween 20 treatment on essential oil content and composition of industrial oil rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) [J].Industrial Crops and Products,2005,21:251-255.
[3]zel M Z,Ggˇüs F,Lewis A C.Comparison of direct thermal desorption with water distillation and superheated water extraction for the analysis of volatile components of Rosa damascena Mill.Using GCxGC-TOF/MS [J].Analytica Chimica Acta,2006,566:172-177.
[4]冯立国,生利霞,赵兰勇.玫瑰花发育过程中芳香成分及含量的变化[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(12):4341-4351.
[5]周小琦,方敏,宫智勇.玫瑰花中总黄酮提取工艺及其抗氧化与抑菌作用的研究[J].食品科学,2010,31(20):102-105.
[6]李晓晴,骆志成,李文竹.玫瑰挥发油抗念珠菌活性的体外研究及两种药敏试验方法的比较[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2006,20(6):321-323.
[7]蒋小龙,寸东义,杨晶焰.香茅精油、香茅醛、香茅醇对储粮霉菌和害虫抑制与熏杀效果的试验研究[J].郑州粮食学院学报,1994,15(1):39-46.
[8]张风娟,李继泉,徐兴友,等.皂荚和五角枫挥发性物质组成及其对空气微生物的抑制作用[J].园艺学报,2007,34(4):973-978.
[9]李涛,王飞,田治国,等.6种宿根花卉挥发性物质抑菌效应初报[J].园艺学报,2009,36(12):1816-1820.
[10]Kim Y S,Shin D H.Volatile components and antibacterial effects of pine needle (Pinus densiflora S.and Z.)extracts[J].Food Microbiology,2005,22:37-45.
[11]Kim Y S,Shin D H.A review-researches on the volatile antimicrobial compounds from edible plants and their food application[J].Korean J.Food Sci.Technol.,2003,35:159-165.
[12]Mevy J P,Bessiere J M,Dherbomez M,et al.Chemical composition and some biological activities of the volatile oils of a chemotype of Lippia chevalieri Moldenke [J].Food Chemistry,2007,101:682-685.
[13]李艳艳,丰震,赵兰勇.用AMMI模型分析玫瑰品种产花量的稳定性[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(6):1761-1766. [14]黄健屛,吴楚才.与城区比较的森林区微生物类群在空气中的分布状况[J].林业科学,2002,38(2):173-176. [15]马希汉,王永红,尉芹,等.玫瑰花精油含量的动态变化[J].林业科学,2006,42(3):77-80.
[16]谢慧玲,李树人,袁秀云,等.植物挥发性分泌物对空气微生物杀灭作用的研究[J].河南农业大学学报,1999,33(2):127-132.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-09-04