WANG Zhongxing,WEI Yunna,GU Peiwen.The Toxicity and Control Effect of Several Botanical and Biological′s Pesticides Against Botrytis cinerea[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(15):55-60.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20184536]
几种植物源和微生物源药剂对葡萄灰霉菌的毒力测定及田间防效
- Title:
- The Toxicity and Control Effect of Several Botanical and Biological′s Pesticides Against Botrytis cinerea
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以6种生防农药和“威代尔”葡萄为试材，采用室内毒力测定、离体果粒和田间药效试验，研究了几种植物源和微生物源药剂对葡萄灰霉病的防治效果，以期为这6种生防农药的进一步推广应用起到指导作用。结果表明：植物源药剂丁子香芹酚和微生物源药剂寡雄腐霉菌，均能有效的抑制葡萄灰霉病菌菌丝的生长，其EC50值分别为4.64 μL?mL-1和1.21 mg?mL-1；丁子香芹酚(120 μL?mL-1)和寡雄腐霉菌(1.8 mg?mL-1)对葡萄灰霉病都具有很好的保护和治疗作用，其防治效果和化学农药嘧啶胺（0.2 μL?mL-1）防效相当，同时对葡萄植株的生长和果实都没有影响。试验表明植物源药剂丁子香芹酚和微生物源药剂寡雄腐霉菌对葡萄灰霉病防治效果明显，值得在葡萄生产上推广使用。
- Abstract:
- Six biological pesticides and ‘Vidal’ grapes were used as materials,and taking laboratorying toxicity,isolated grape and control efficacy test,the effects of several botanical and biological′s pesticides against on Botrytis cinerea were investigated,in order to play a guiding role in the further promotion and application of the six biological pesticides.The results of toxicity test showed that the eugenel and pythium oligandrum could inhibit the growth of the mycelium of Botrytis cinereal,EC50 were 4.64 μL?mL-1 and 1.21 mg?mL-1 respectively.At the same time,the results of tests showed that eugenel (120 μL?mL-1) and pythium oligandrum (1.8 mg?mL-1) both had a remarkable protection and treatment effect on grape Botrytis cinerea,and the effect was similar to chemical pesticide (0.2 μL?mL-1),and had no effect on the growth and fruit of the grape plants.Thus,the experiment showed that the eugenel and pythium oligandrum had obvious effects on the control of Botrytis cinerea,which is deserve to popularize on grape production.
参考文献/References:
[1]张玮,乔广行,黄金宝,等.中国葡萄灰霉病菌对嘧霉胺的抗药性检测[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(6)：1208-1212.[2]付学池,马国春,李燕,等.葡萄灰霉病的发生规律及绿色防控技术[J].果农之友,2018(3)：26-27.[3]刘世秋,郭锐,张军翔.宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄灰霉病的发生与综合防治[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2012(4)：38-40.[4]丁中,刘峰,王会利,等.番茄灰霉菌的多重抗药性研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,32(4):452-456．[5]严红,燕继晔,王忠跃,等.葡萄灰霉病菌对3种杀菌剂的多重抗药性检测[J].果树学报,2012,29(4)：625-629．[6]乔广行,严红,么奕清,等.北京地区番茄灰霉病菌的多重抗药性检测[J].植物保护,2011,37(5)：176-180．[7]张迪,王晓东.葡萄灰霉病生物防治研究进展[J].中国植保导刊,2017,37(7)：24-28.[8]卢政辉.秀珍菇哈茨木霉菌高效低毒防治药剂的筛选[J].食药用菌,2018,26(3):178-183.[9]王恢.哈茨木霉菌提高葡萄硬枝扦插生根成活率试验[J].山西果树,2015(5):11-12.[10]曹辉,左红娟,石彦召,等.葡萄霜霉病生物防治试验[J].农业科技通讯,2018(1):150-151.[11]于广威,李圣辰,卢倩.不同生物杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病的防效对比试验[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(8):66-74.[12]陈磊,何欢宇,黄淼,等.几种杀菌剂防治黄瓜白粉病的田间药效试验[J].农学学报,2014,4(7):24-25.[13]王玥双.哈茨木霉防治草莓灰霉病[J].中国果业信息,2018,35(6):55.[14]殷洁,袁玲.寡雄腐霉菌剂对辣椒疫病的防治及促生效应[J].园艺学报,2017,44(12):2327-2337.[15]赵建,黄建国.寡雄腐霉发酵液与化学农药联用对番茄晚疫病菌的防治作用[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(5):115-118.[16]刘伟,魏俊梅,马丽,等.枯草芽孢杆菌可湿性粉剂防治棉花黄萎病示范[J].农村科技,2017(12):26-27.[17]范昆,张雪丹,余贤美,等.无花果炭疽病菌的生物学特性及8种杀菌剂对其抑制作用[J].植物病理学报,2013,43(1)：75-81.[18]罗琳,王其慧,刘娅,等.葡萄灰霉病生防菌株的筛选及其拮抗机理初探[J].中国酿造，2017,36(4)：93-98.[19]农业部农药检定所生测室.农药田间药效试验准则(二)GB[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.[20]韩景红.防治番茄灰霉病田间药效试验研究[J].农业科技通讯,2018(3)：140-142.[21]武哲,孙蕾,刘彦彦,等.2%武夷菌素水剂对草莓白粉病的毒力测定及田间防效[J].植物保护,2013,39(4)：175-178.[22]刘博,傅俊.草莓白粉病研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2007(2)：20-22.
相似文献/References:
[1]祝 菁,杜学林,陈丽霞,等.丝瓜伤流液对三种常见真菌抑制作用的研究[J].北方园艺,2014,38(03):121.
ZHU Jing,DU Xue-lin,CHEN Li-xia,et al.Study on the Inhibition Activity of Bleeding Sap of Luffa cylindrical(L.) Roern. on Three Common Fungus[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(15):121.
[2]邢小霞,李秀岚.丝瓜乙醇提取物对几种植物病原真菌抑菌活性的研究[J].北方园艺,2015,39(13):131.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201513037]
XING Xiaoxia,LI Xiulan.Study on Antifungal Activity of Several Plant Pathogenit Fungi From Ethanol Extract of Luffa[J].Northern Horticulture,2015,39(15):131.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201513037]
[3]周顺玉,尹 健,马俊义.几种植物源农药防治茶树主要害虫的药效[J].北方园艺,2011,35(11):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.2011011047]
ZHOU Shun-yu,YIN Jian,MA Jun-yi.Efficacy of Several Botanical lnsectiddes Against Main Pests in Tea P!atafion[J].Northern Horticulture,2011,35(15):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.2011011047]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：王忠兴（1994-）,男，硕士研究生，研究方向葡萄与葡萄酒酿造。E-mail:2672883906@qq.com.责任作者：顾沛雯（1969-），女，博士，教授，现主要从事植物病理学与生物防治的教学和研究等工作。E-mail：gupeiwen2013@126.com.基金项目：宁夏“十三五”重大科技资助项目（2016BZ06）。收稿日期：2019-03-07