LIU Zhanwei.Government Intervention,Marketization Process and Agricultural Production Efficiency[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(15):148-157.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20183420]
政府干预、市场化进程与农业生产效率
- Title:
- Government Intervention,Marketization Process and Agricultural Production Efficiency
- Keywords:
- government intervention; marketization process; agricultural production efficiency; panel threshold model
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 基于2000—2014年中国30个省级面板数据，建立了以市场化进程为门槛变量的面板门槛模型，实证分析了政府干预对农业生产效率增长的非线性影响效应及区域差异。结果表明：政府干预与农业生产效率之间存在显著的以市场化进程为门槛的双重门槛效应；当市场化进程低于第一个门槛值时，政府干预对农业生产效率增长产生显著的促进作用，随着市场化进程跨过第一门槛值时，政府干预对农业生产效率增长显著的促进作用得到较大提升；当市场化进程跨过第二门槛值时，政府干预对农业生产效率增长产生显著的制约作用，政府干预对农业生产效率增长呈现出先促进后阻碍的倒“V”型变动趋势；中国各省份政府干预和市场化进程的耦合度较低，但政府干预和市场化进程耦合度较高的省份倾向于具有较高的农业生产效率。
- Abstract:
- Based on the 30 provincial panel data of China from 2000 to 2014,a panel threshold model with marketization degree as the threshold variable was established,and the non-linear effect and regional difference of government intervention to increase the efficiency of agricultural production was analyzed.The results showed that the impact on government intervention to increase the efficiency of agricultural production efficiency had a significant double threshold effect.When the marketization process was lower than the first threshold,government intervention had a significant effect on the growth of agricultural production efficiency,and as the market process crossed the first threshold,the effect of government intervention on the growth of agricultural productivity was greatly improved.When the market process crossed the second threshold,government intervention had a significant restraining effect on the growth of agricultural productivity,and the government intervention had shown a ‘V’change trend which first promotes and hinders the growth of agricultural productivity；The coupling degree of government intervention and marketization process in Chinese provinces was low,however,the provinces with high coupling of government intervention and marketization process tended to have higher agricultural production efficiency.
参考文献/References:
[1]鲍金红,胡璇.我国现阶段的市场失灵及其与政府干预的关系研究[J].学术界,2013(7):182-191.[2]金高峰.市场化进程、农业政策与农业产出效率：基于面板数据的异质性随机前沿分析[J].科技与经济,2015,28(5):51-55.[3]荀明俐.政府干预市场的三重边界:基于公共责任视角[J].中国行政管理,2016(4)：122-126.[4]张同斌,刘琳.政府干预、市场化进程与经济增长动力:兼论“简政放权”如何动态释放改革红利[J].浙江社会科学,2017(1):17-27.[5]李洪炼,马春艳.政府支持、市场化程度与农业技术创新效率:以中部6省为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(6):189-198.[6]孙铮,刘凤委,李增泉.市场化程度、政府干预与企业债务期限结构:来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].经济研究,2005(5):52-63.[7]陈凌云,潘端莲,纪德兰.市场化进程、政府干预与企业对外担保[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2011,26(3):39-45.[8]孙刚,宋夏云.金融市场化、政府干预机制与企业创新投入效率[J].财经论丛,2016,204(2):47-55.[9]左晶晶,唐跃军,季志成.政府干预、市场化改革与公司研发创新[J].研究与发展管理,2016,28(6):80-90.[10]HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels：estimation，testing，and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics，1999，93(2)：345-368．[11]毛捷,汪德华,白重恩.民族地区转移支付、公共支出差异与经济发展差距[J].经济研究,2011(s2):75-87.[12]孙才志,陈琳,赵良仕,等.中国农村水贫困和经济贫困的时空耦合关系研究[J].资源科学,2013,35(10):1991-2002.
备注/Memo
作者简介：刘战伟(1979-)，男，河南许昌人，硕士，副教授，研究方向为区域经济与技术创新。E-mail:liu791024@163.com.基金项目：河南省哲学社会科学规划资助项目（2017CJJ097）；河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究资助项目（2018-ZZJH-504）；许昌学院优秀青年骨干教师资助项目。收稿日期：2019-01-23