ZHANGLuyao,SHENHui,TIANJuncang.ScreeningofCerasushumilisinGravel-mulchedFieldBasedonFuzzyComprehensiveEvaluationMethod[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(03):189-196.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20181628]
基于模糊综合评价法的压砂地欧李品种筛选
- Title:
- ScreeningofCerasushumilisinGravel-mulchedFieldBasedonFuzzyComprehensiveEvaluationMethod
- 文章编号:
- 20181628
- Keywords:
- Keywords:gravel-mulchedfield; Cerasushumilis; variety; comprehensivebenefits; fuzzycomprehensiveevaluationmethod
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 摘要：以10种不同品种欧李为试材，在田间试验条件下，研究了其生长指标、叶绿素相对含量、产量以及果实品质；同时引入模糊综合评价法，构建产量、品质和生物学性状方面共10个因子的欧李品种综合效益评价体系，采用层次分析法（AHP）确定各评价因子的权重，结合隶属度函数及5个等级的评价矩阵，通过模糊综合评价数学模型计算得出不同品种压砂地欧李综合效益评价值，为压砂地欧李产业的发展提供参考依据。结果表明：水肥和栽培相同条件下，‘5号’的667m2产量最高，‘4号’果实钙含量及其叶片叶绿素相对含量最高。10个品种欧李模糊综合效益值排序为‘6号’>‘07-14’>‘5号’>‘03-25’>‘4号’>‘7号’>‘S-D’>‘23-04’>‘03-35’>‘9号’。根据单因素分析结果，‘5号’和‘4号’具有较好的适应性。欧李坐果主要依靠异花授粉，根据模糊综合效益值排序，可选取‘6号’‘07-14’‘5号’欧李在压砂地种植。
- Abstract:
- Abstract:Underthefieldexperimentcondition，taking10differentvarieties（lines）ofthree-yearsCerasushumilisasthetestmaterials,theplantheight,stemdiameter,chlorophyllrelativecontent,yieldandfruitqualityofthemwereresearchedandanalyzed.Andthefuzzycomprehensiveevaluationmethodwasintroducedatthesametime.ThecomprehensivebenefitsevaluationsystemofthedifferentvarietiesofCerasushumilisingravel-mulchedfieldwasbuildwith10indexeswhichwereincludedinyield,qualityandbiologicalcharacteristics.Then,theAnalyticHierarchyProcess(AHP)todefinitetheweightofeachevaluationindexwasadopted,andthemembershipfunctionaswellastheevaluationmatrixoffivelevelswascombined.Finally,thecomprehensivebenefitsevaluationvaluesofthedifferentvarietiesofCerasushumilisingravel-mulchedfieldwascalculatedbyfuzzycomprehensiveevaluationmathematicsmodel,inordertoprovidetheoreticalbasisandtechnicalsupporttothedevelopmentoftheCerasushumilisaswellasgravel-mulchedfieldindustry.Theresultsshowedthatthe‘No5’hadthebestyieldin10varieties（lines）,‘No4’hadthehighestcalciumcontentofitsfruitandthechlorophyllrelativecontentofitsbladeinthesamecondition.RankingthecomprehensivebenefitsevaluationvaluesofthedifferentvarietiesofCerasushumilis,‘No6’wasthebest,followingthe‘07-14’‘No5’‘03-25’‘No4’‘No7’‘S-D’,thenwasthe‘23-04’‘03-35’,theworstwas‘No9’.Accordingtotheanalysisresultsofsinglefactor,the‘No5’and‘No4’hadbetteradaptationingravel-mulchedfield.TheCerasushumilisbearfruitsdepenedonalienationpollination,the‘No6’‘07-14’and‘No5’wereselectedtoplantingravel-mulchedfielddependontherankoffuzzycomprehensivebenefits.
参考文献/References:
[1]哈小丽,韩占江,梁继业.不同欧李品种(系)光合与水分利用特性比较[J].北方园艺,2017(2):7-11.[2]周文才,巢军,孙颖,等.不同钙果品系引种试验[J].南方林业科学,2017,45(1):14-16,31.[3]赵建成.钙果的种植与加工[M].太原:山西经济出版社,2014:1-21.[4]开建荣,王晓静.不同压砂地龄土壤肥力及硒砂瓜品质分析[J].北方园艺,2017(3):168-172.[5]边雅茹,田军仓.灌水量对压砂地欧李光合作用及产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2017(2):34-38.[6]邢天钧.中卫香山地区压砂地引种欧李造林试验研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2014,55(4):18-19.[7]李正祥.多品种比较试验用邓肯新复极差法的统计与分析方法[J].中国甜菜糖业,1983(2):16-18.[8]唐启义.DPS数据处理系统[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2013:87-145.[9]孙福东,魏凤荣.应用Excel巧解模糊综合评价法[J].统计与决策,2011(23):172-174.[10]晋艳云,高万林,张晗,等.基于模糊综合评价法的玉米新品种种子价值评估[J].中国种业，2015(10):18-21.[11]金彪,孙明艳,李海防.基于AHP-模糊综合评价法的桂林“两江四湖”旅游景区植物景观评价[J].北方园艺,2017(1):203-207.[12]孙明明,王秀芳,王梅,等.基于模糊综合评价法的河北省农业科技创新风险投资影响因素分析[J].北方园艺,2014(22):208-211.[13]母冰洁,张世军,卜芳侠,等.韩城市欧李新品系引进试验[J].陕西林业科技,2016(4)：41-45.[14]李海潮,韦开卫,王斌,等.原子吸收法测定31种蔬菜水果中的微量元素含量[J].国外医学(医学地理分册),2013,34(3):187-190.
相似文献/References:
[1]刘显臣,苗金友,柳明玉,等.粒状钙镁磷肥对长白山欧李产量和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(02):171.
LIU Xian-chen,MIAO Jin-you,LIU Ming-yu,et al.Effects of GFMP on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Seedlings of Prunus humilis[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(03):171.
[2]车家骧,谢元贵,彭熙,等.欧李叶片秋季光合作用日变化研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(09):6.
CHE Jia-xiang,XIE Yuan-gui,PENG Xi,et al.Study on Photosynthetic Diurnal Variation in Leaves of Cerasus humilis (Bunge) Sok.in Autumn[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(03):6.
[3]梁伟玲,卢彦琦,陈翠果,等.欧李优系试管苗增殖关键技术研究[J].北方园艺,2016,40(17):103.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201617024]
LIANG Weiling,LU Yanqi,CHEN Cuiguo,et al.Key Proliferation Technology of Prunus humilis Fine Strains Plantlets in vitro[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(03):103.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201617024]
[4]肖 啸,张立彬,刘建珍.欧李嫁接成活率的比较研究[J].北方园艺,2011,35(03):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201103012]
XIAO Xiao,ZHANG Li-bin,LIU Jianzhen.of Survival Rate of Grafting in Chinese Dwarf Cherry[J].Northern Horticulture,2011,35(03):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201103012]
[5]焦 淑 华,林 丽 华,李 宝 江.欧李绿枝组织培养与快速繁殖研究[J].北方园艺,2006,30(03):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.200603081]
[J].Northern Horticulture,2006,30(03):0.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.200603081]
[6]哈小丽,韩占江,梁继业.不同欧李品种（系）光合与水分利用特性比较[J].北方园艺,2017,41(02):7.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201702002]
HA Xiaoli,HAN Zhanjiang,LIANG Jiye.Comparasion of Photosynthetic and Water Use Characteristics of Different Varieties (Lines) in Prunus humilis[J].Northern Horticulture,2017,41(03):7.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201702002]
[7]韩轩轩,王鹏飞,穆霄鹏,等.地布覆盖下不同垄型对欧李园土壤温湿度与果实品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2018,42(20):25.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20180715]
HAN Xuanxuan,WANG Pengfei,MU Xiaopeng,et al.Effects of Different Ridge Shapes With Ground Cover on Soil Temperature,Humidity and Fruit Quality of Chinese Dwarf Cherry[J].Northern Horticulture,2018,42(03):25.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20180715]
[8]殷亚蕊,武军凯,马聚泽,等.欧李自交不亲和S-RNase基因型鉴定及序列分析[J].北方园艺,2019,43(24):28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20191520]
YIN Yarui,WU Junkai,MA Juze,et al.Identification and Sequence Analysis of S-RNase Genes From Prunus humilis Bunge[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(03):28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20191520]
[9]段艳婷,李学强,耿杰,等.‘优选1号’欧李果叶涩味物质变化[J].北方园艺,2020,44(24):8.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202201]
DUAN Yanting,LI Xueqiang,GENG Jie,et al.Changes of Astringent Substance in Fruits and Leaves of ‘Outstanding No.1’ Cerasus humilis[J].Northern Horticulture,2020,44(03):8.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202201]
[10]孙聪,任鹏达,李连国,等.干旱胁迫下欧李叶片叶绿体光合参数与超弱光子辐射的关系[J].北方园艺,2021,(09):25.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20203638]
SUN Cong,REN Pengda,LI Lianguo,et al.Relationship Between Ultraweak Photon Emission and Photosynthetic Parameters of Cerasus humilisLeaves Chloroplast Under Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2021,(03):25.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20203638]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：张璐瑶（1992-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为旱区节水灌溉理论与技术。E-mail：851651518@qq.com.责任作者：沈晖（1971-），女，博士，教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为旱区节水灌溉理论与技术。E-mail：nxushh@126.com.基金项目：宁夏高等学校科研资助项目（NGY2017041）。收稿日期：2018-06-30