[1]萨吉旦?阿卜杜克日木,祖力克艳?麻那甫,巴特尔?巴克,等.新疆南疆三种果树叶表面微形态结构与滞尘能力比较[J].北方园艺,2017,41(24):128-133.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20170549]
　Sajidan ABUDUKERIMU,Zulikeyan MANAFU,Batur BAKE,et al.Leaf Surface Microstructures of Three Fruit Trees and Comparison of Their Dust Detaining Capabilities in Southern of Xinjiang[J].Northern Horticulture,2017,41(24):128-133.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20170549]
点击复制

新疆南疆三种果树叶表面微形态结构与滞尘能力比较

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S] 卷: 第41卷 期数: 2017年24 页码: 128-133 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-12-25
Title:
Leaf Surface Microstructures of Three Fruit Trees and Comparison of Their Dust Detaining Capabilities in Southern of Xinjiang
作者:
萨吉旦?阿卜杜克日木; 祖力克艳?麻那甫; 巴特尔?巴克; 王孟辉
新疆农业大学 草业与环境科学学院，新疆 乌鲁木齐 830052
Author(s):
Sajidan ABUDUKERIMU; Zulikeyan MANAFU; Batur BAKE; WANG Menghui
College of Pratacultural and Environmental Sciences,Xinjiang Agricultural University,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830052
关键词:
果树叶片; 滞尘量; 叶表面结构
Keywords:
fruit leaves; dust retention amount; surface structure of the leaves
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20170549
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以新疆轮台县3种果树（苹果、核桃、杏）叶片为试材，对其滞尘量和叶片表面微形态结构进行观测，探究了3种果树叶片平均滞尘量在不同时间段和不同高度的变化及叶表面结构与其滞尘量的关系。结果表明：不同果树的滞尘量不同，其中苹果叶片的滞尘量最大，可达到5.295 mg?cm-2，杏叶片的滞尘量最低，仅为2.697 mg?cm-2。叶片滞尘量随时间延长而增加（P<0.01）；不同高度的滞尘量差异极显著（P<0.01），叶片平均滞尘量依次为1 m[(1.716±0.800)mg?cm-2]>2 m[(1.217±0.355)mg?cm-2]>3 m[(0.950±0.362)mg?cm-2]。叶片表面观察结果表明，果树叶片表面在微形态结构上存在明显差异，滞尘能力较强的苹果叶表面结构粗糙，具有绒毛；滞尘能力较弱的杏叶表面结构光滑，无毛。叶表面结构不同，滞尘能力也出现明显差异，说明滞尘能力与叶表特征密切相关。
Abstract:
In order to study the dust detaining capability Malus pumila,Juglans regia,Armeniaca vulgaris trees were chosen to measure and compare its content of dust retention,and the interrelation between leaf surface morphological structure and dust amount were explored.The results showed that the order from strong to weak in dust retaining capability in tested fruit tree leaves were Malus pumila>Juglans regia>Armeniaca vulgaris.The highest value of 5.295 mg?cm-2 was recorded in Malus pumila,and the lowest value of 2.697 mg?cm-2 was recorded in Armeniaca vulgaris.The dust amount increases with time prolonging(P<0.01),the difference was extremely significant in the different heights dust retention amount(P<0.01),the average leaf dust amount was 1 m[(1.716±0.800)mg?cm-2]>2 m[(1.217±0.355)mg?cm-2]>3 m[(0.950±0.362)mg?cm-2].The electronic photos showed it′s significantly different in leaf surface micro-morphological structure.Malus pumila was coarse for villous feature,Armeniaca vulgaris was smooth,without villus,villous feature by observing the surface structure of the leaves.Due to different leaf surface micro-morphological structures,the three fruit trees showed different dust detaining capability.The findings that the dust detaining capability was closely related with leaf surface features.

参考文献/References:

[1]王会霞,石辉,李秧秧.城市绿化植物叶片表面特征对滞尘能力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3077-3082.

[2]SMITH P H,HOLLOWAY S,GOODMAN A.The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland:Site description and particulate composition[J].Environmental Pollution,1997,95(1):27-35.
[3]高金晖,王冬梅,赵亮,等.植物叶片滞尘规律研究：以北京市为例[J].北京林业大学学报,2007,29(2):94-99.
[4]王月菡.基于生态功能的城市森林绿地规划控制性指标研究：以南京市为例[D].南京:南京林业大学,2004.
[5]阿丽亚?拜都热拉,玉米提?哈力克,塔依尔江?艾山,等.阿克苏市5种常见绿化树种滞尘规律[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(9):970-977.
[6]高志慧.山西大同大学校园主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J].山西大同大学学报(自然科学版),2016,32(3):61-64.
[7]LANGNER M,KULL M,ENDLICHER W R.Determination of PM10 deposition based on antimony flux to selected urban surfaces[J].Environmental Pollution,2011,159(8):2028-2034.
[8]李海梅,刘霞.青岛市城阳区主要园林树种叶片表皮形态与滞尘量的关系[J].生态学杂志,2006,27(10):1659-1662.
[9]SCHLEICHER N J,NORRA S,CHAI F,et al.Temporal variability of trace metal mobility of urban particulate matter from Beijing:A contribution to health impact assessments of aerosols[J].Atmospheric Environment,2011,45(39):7248-7265.
[10]迈迪娜?吐尔逊,玉米提?哈力克,祖皮艳木?买买提,等.阿克苏市城郊林10种果树叶面形态与滞尘量的关系[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(4):279-283.
[11]RSNEN J V,HOLOPAINEN T,JOUTSENSAARI J,et al.Effects of species-specific leaf characteristics and reduced water availability on fine particle capture efficiency of trees[J].Environmental Pollution,2013,183:64-70.
[12]阿丽亚?拜都热拉,玉米提?哈力克,塔依尔江?艾山,等.干旱区绿洲城市主要绿化树种最大滞尘量对比[J].林业科学,2015(3):57-64.
[13]高传友.南宁市典型园林植物滞尘效应及生理特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):187-192.
[14]高金晖.北京市主要植物种滞尘影响机制及其效果研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.
[15]史琛媛,张玉梅,路亚星,等.保定市几种常见绿化树种叶片滞尘能力研究[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(3):289-294.
[16]巴特尔?巴克,茹鲜?木沙,沙依甫加玛力?司玛丽,等.新疆南疆6种果树叶片滞尘能力分析[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(2):125-128.
[17]程雨萌,王云琦,王玉杰,等.北京市5种典型植物滞尘特征及影响因素[J].环境化学,2016,35(8):1690-1697.
[18]蔡礼顺,李杰,朱自学.5种蔷薇科植物叶表皮特征的扫描电镜观察[J].安徽农业科学，2012,40(10):5842.
[19]李新宇,赵松婷,李延明,等.北方常用园林植物滞留颗粒物能力评价[J].中国园林,2015(3):72-75.
[20]赵勇,李树人,阎志平.城市绿地的滞尘效应及评价方法[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(6):582-586.
[21]陆锡东,李萍娇,贺庆梅,等.宜州城区5种行道树叶表面特征及滞尘效果比较[J].河池学院学报,2014,34(5):37-43.
[22]夏侯祯.大连市18种常见行道树滞尘能力研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2015.
[23]陈玮,何兴元,张粤,等.东北地区城市针叶树冬季滞尘效应研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(12):2113-2116.
[24]郭伟,申屠雅瑾,郑述强,等.城市绿地滞尘作用机理和规律的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010,26(6):1465-1470.
[25]陈雪华.5个榕树品种叶表面微形态结构与滞尘能力比较[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(10):1245-1247.
[26]孙晓丹,李海梅,孙丽,等.8种灌木滞尘能力及叶表面结构研究[J].环境化学,2016,35(9):1815-1822.
[27]LIU L,GUAN D,PEART M R,et al.The dust retention capacities of urban vegetation：A case study of Guangzhou,South China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2013,20(9):6601-6610.
[28]王赞红,李纪标.城市街道常绿灌木植物叶片滞尘能力及滞尘颗粒物形态[J].生态环境学报,2006,15(2):327-330.
[29]俞学如.南京市主要绿化树种叶面滞尘特征及其与叶面结构的关系[D].南京：南京林业大学,2008.

备注/Memo

第一作者简介：萨吉旦?阿卜杜克日木（1990-），女，新疆伊犁人，硕士，研究方向为环境污染与修复。E-mail:sajidamyili@163.com.

责任作者：巴特尔?巴克（1973-），男，新疆喀什人，博士，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为干旱区生态与环境及气象灾害。E-mail：bateerbake@163.com.
基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目(31460316)。
收稿日期：2017-04-11

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-29