HE Lijing,ZHOU Shubo,HE Lihong,et al.Effect of Different Shade Trees on Influencing of Reducing Temperature， Increasing Humidity and Dust Retention Capacity[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(23):83-85.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201623020]
不同行道树降温增湿及滞尘效应
- Title:
- Effect of Different Shade Trees on Influencing of Reducing Temperature， Increasing Humidity and Dust Retention Capacity
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以海南热带海洋学院（三亚校区）校园行道树优势树种高山榕、大叶相思、印度胶树、菩提树、非洲楝、火焰木、马占相思、香樟、鸭脚木、小叶榄仁、垂叶榕、隆缘桉为研究对象，比较了乔木绿化树种的降温增湿和滞尘能力。结果表明：在相同环境生长的种龄相当的树种，降温增湿效应不同，高山榕、大叶相思、印度胶树的降温增湿能力最好；降温增湿效应比较差的是隆缘桉、小叶榄仁和垂叶榕。不同树种的滞尘能力也有差异，其中滞尘能力较强的乔木树种是火焰木、菩提树、高山榕和印度胶树。该研究结果对校园绿化和城市行道树的规划选择都具有一定的参考价值。
- Abstract:
- The capacity of arbor on reducing temperature，increasing humidity and dust retention was studied on campus shade trees in Hainan Tropical Ocean University (Sanya campus)，such as Ficus altissima, Acacia auriculaeformis，Ficus elastica，Ficus religiosa，Khaya senegalensis，Spathodea campanulata，Acacia mangium，Cinnamomum camphora，Alstonia scholaris，Terminalia mantaly，Ficus benjamina，Eucalyptus exserta.The results shown that reducing temperature and increasing humidity were showed difference in tree species of the similar ages in the same environment.The effects of reducing temperature and increasing humidity were the best on Ficus altissima，Acacia auriculaeformis and Ficus elastica and were worse on Eucalyptus exserta，Terminalia mantaly and Ficus benjamina.The capacities of dust retention showed difference in different tree species，which were better capacities of dust retention focus on Spathodea campanulata，Ficus religiosa，Ficus altissima and Ficus elastica.The results of this study supplied some reference value for campus greening and city street planning.
参考文献/References:
[1]马秀枝,李长生,陈高娃,等.校园内行道树不同树种降温增湿效应研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2011,32(1):125-130. [2]刘振威,孙丽,沈军.校园内不同树种行道树生态效应研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(4):208-210. [3]朱凤荣,周君丽.二十种园林绿化树木滞尘量比较[J].北方园艺,2013(12):48-50. [4]赵勇,李树人,阎志平.城市绿地的滞尘效应及评价方法[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(6):582-586. [5]刘颖,李朝炜,邢文岳,等.城市交通道路绿化植物滞尘效应研究[J].北方园艺,2015(3):77-81. [6]华国峰,谢正生.海南蒲桃+阴香林带的降温增湿效应[J].广东林业科技,2007,23(1):58-61. [7]戚继忠,魏进华,张倩,等.城市树木滞尘能力研究及存在的问题与对策[J].世界林业研究,2013,26(3):52-57. [8]廖莉团,苏欣,李小龙,等.城市绿化植物滞尘效益及滞尘影响因素研究概述[J].森林工程,2014,30(2):21-24,28. [9]周晓炜,亢秀萍.几种校园绿化植物滞尘能力研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(24):10431-10432.
相似文献/References:
[1]冯程程,姜永雷,唐探,等.昆明市十五种绿化树种降温增湿效应研究[J].北方园艺,2015,39(13):76.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201513023]
FENG Chengcheng,JIANG Yonglei,TANG Tan,et al.Research on Effect of Reducing Temperature and Increasing Humidity of 15 Greenery Trees in Kunming City[J].Northern Horticulture,2015,39(23):76.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201513023]
[2]郭杨,刘杨,杨维菊.基于GGE双标图的公园绿地树种生态效益研究[J].北方园艺,2022,(13):86.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20214788]
GUO Yang,LIU Yang,YANG Weiju.Ecological Benefits of Tree Species in Park Green Space Based on GGE Biplot Analysis[J].Northern Horticulture,2022,(23):86.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20214788]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：贺立静（1976-），女，博士，副教授，现主要从事生态学方面的科研与教学等工作。E-mail：ljhe2007@qq.com. 责任作者：贺立红（1970-），女，博士，教授，现主要从事植物生理生化科研与教学等工作。E-mail：helihong70@163.com. 基金项目：海南省自然科学基金资助项目（314085）。