ZHU Honghui,LIU Jing,ZHANG Xin,et al.Effect of Loading Rate and Moisture Content on the Anti-fracture Strength of Straight Roots of Four Plant Species[J].Northern Horticulture,2016,40(06):70-73.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.201606018]
加载速度及含水率对四种植物直根抗折强度的影响
- Title:
- Effect of Loading Rate and Moisture Content on the Anti-fracture Strength of Straight Roots of Four Plant Species
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以3~4年生柠条、沙柳、沙棘、白沙蒿为研究对象，采用TY8000系列伺服控制材料试验机，研究加载速度及土壤含水率对直根抗折强度的影响。结果表明：4种植物直根的抗折强度与加载速度呈正相关，1.5~2.0 mm及3.0~3.5 mm 2个径级的直根在承受瞬时折断力(加载速度 500 mm/min和860 mm/min)时的抗折强度显著高于相同径级的根在缓慢折断力(加载速度10 mm/min)时的抗折强度，其中加载速度500 mm/min时2个径级直根抗折强度为柠条((58.30±7.45)MPa，(49.21±3.45)MPa)>沙柳((23.21±1.88)MPa，(19.12±2.95)MPa)>沙棘((7.79±1.06)MPa，(6.61±1.05)MPa)>白沙蒿((5.51±0.66)MPa，(4.43±0.38)MPa)，相同径级的根在缓慢折断力时的抗折强度分别为上述强度的87.1%、83.7%，82.8%、86.8%，79.2%、81.8%，90.0%、73.6%。4种植物直根抗折强度随着土壤和根系含水率的增加呈减小趋势，2.0~2.5 mm的直根在土壤干旱(含水率为0.0%)时的抗折强度为柠条((60.05±7.00)MPa)>沙柳((25.99±2.88)MPa)>沙棘((8.52±1.17)MPa)>白沙蒿((5.85±0.63)MPa)，在土壤含水率饱和(含水率为25.6%)时的抗折强度分别为上述强度79.1%、73.0%、74.3%、65.1%。
- Abstract:
- The anti-fracture strength of straight roots of four plant species were measured by the Multifunctional Electronic Pull Test Machine of TY8000 in vigorous loading rates and vigorous moisture content seasons.The four plant species were the vegetation species of Caragana korshinskii，Salix psammophila，Artemisia sphaerocephala and Hippophae rhamnides.For the four plant species，the roots were selected from the corresponding plant age of 3-4-year-old.The results showed that the anti-fracture strength of straight roots of four plant species were positively correlated with the loading rate.The anti-fracture strength of the root under instantaneous breaking force (the loading rate of 500 mm/min and 860 mm/min) was significantly higher than that of the root under the slow breaking force (the loading rate of 10 mm/min) with the same diameter.Under the loading rate of 500 mm/min，the anti-fracture strength of 1.5-2.0 mm and 3.0-3.5 mm diameter class roots followed the sequence of Caragana ((58.30±7.45)MPa，(49.21±3.45)MPa)> Salix ((23.21±1.88)MPa，(19.12±2.95)MPa)>Hippophae ((7.79±1.06)MPa，(6.61±1.05)MPa)>Artemisia ((5.51±0.66)MPa，(4.43±0.38)MPa)；comparing with the strength of the roots mentioned above，the anti-fracture strength of the same diameter class occupied 87.1% and 83.7% for Caragana,82.8% and 86.8% for Salix，79.2% and 81.8% for Hippophae，90.0% and 73.6% for Artemisia under the loading rate of 10 mm/min.With the increase of soil moisture content，the root moisture content of four plant species increased and the anti-fracture strength had a tendency to reduce.The anti-fracture strength of 2.0-2.5 mm straight roots for the four species followed the sequence of Caragana ((60.05±7.00)MPa)> Salix ((25.99±2.88)MPa)>Hippophae ((8.52±1.17)MPa) >Artemisia ((5.85±0.63)MPa) under drying soil (soil moisture content was 0.0%).The anti-fracture strength of the same diameter class occupied 79.1% for Caragana，73.0% for Salix，74.3% for Hippophae and 65.1% for Artemisia.
参考文献/References:
[1]POLLEN-BANKHEAD N，SIMON A，THOMAS R E.The reinforcement of soil by roots：recent advances and directions for future research [M]//SHROODER J.Treatise on geomorphology，volume 12：ecogeomorphology.New York：Academic Press，2013:107-124. [2]ABDOLHOSSEIN K，FAISAL H A，NORMANIZA O.Contribution of the root to slope stability[J].Geotechnical and Geological Engineering，2012,30(2)：277-288. [3]ZHANG C，JIANG J，MA J，et al.Evaluating soil reinforcement by plant roots using artificial neural networks[J].Soil Use and Management，2015，31(3):408-416. [4]刘福全,刘静,姚喜军,等.根系固土主导力学因素初探与差异性评价[J].生态学报,2015(19):1-11. [5]ZHANG C B，CHEN L H，JIANG J，et al.Effects of gauge length and strain rate on the tensile strength of tree roots[J].Trees，2012(26):1577-1584. [6]刘玥,刘静,张格,等.二种植物同径级直段根和侧根分支处抗弯力学特性的研究[J].北方园艺,2014(19):16-19. [7]YAO X J，WANG L H，LIU J，et al.Biomechanics and utility of shallow soil fixation by Sabina valgaris Ant.roots in arid and semiarid soils[J].Sensors and Transducers，2014,67(3):129-134. [8]姚喜军,王林和,刘静,等.3种植物单根对土体残余抗剪强度影响的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(2)：110-114. [9]邢会文,刘静,王林和,等.柠条、沙柳根与土及土与土界面摩擦特性[J].摩擦学报,2010,30(1):87-91. [10]刘鹏飞,刘静,张格,等.四种植物生长旺盛期侧根分支处抗折特性研究[J].北方园艺,2015(17):58-61. [11]苑淑娟.4种植物单根抗拉力学特性研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010. [12]张永亮.沙棘根系生物力学特性研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011. [13]刘晓敏.5种植物侧根分支处抗拉力学特性的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013. [14]〖JP〗YUTAKA I，KAZUTOSHI A，MASATO M，et al.Physical and mechanical properties of wood after moisture conditioning[J].The Japan Wood Research Society，2001,47(3):185-191.
相似文献/References:
[1]吉光鹏,姜继元,牛蛉磊,等.“库尔勒香梨”根系分布及不同流量点源入渗湿润体特征[J].北方园艺,2021,(04):10.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202207]
JI Guangpeng,JIANG Jiyuan,NIU Linglei,et al.Characterstics of Root Distribution and Wetting Body of Infiltration With Different Flow Rate for ‘Korla Pear’[J].Northern Horticulture,2021,(06):10.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202207]
[2]高天,刘瑞香,王艺璇,等.额济纳荒漠红砂叶片中保护酶活性及丙二醛含量变化[J].北方园艺,2021,(09):60.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202839]
GAO Tian,LIU Ruixiang,WANG Yixuan,et al.Changes of Superoxide Dismutase Catalase Activity and Malondialdehyde Content in Leaves of Reaumuria soongorica in Ejina Desert[J].Northern Horticulture,2021,(06):60.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20202839]
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：朱宏慧(1990-)，男，山东菏泽人，硕士研究生，研究方向为干旱及半干旱地区水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:654965154@qq.com.责任作者：刘静(1958-)，女，博士，教授，研究方向为干旱及半干旱地区的水土保持与荒漠化防治。E-mail:ljing58@126.com.基金项目：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51364034)。