[1]王丹丹,李燕,张庆银,等.基于主成分分析的黄瓜新品种引进筛选综合评价[J].北方园艺,2022,(23):21-28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20221059]
　WANG Dandan,LI Yan,ZHANG Qingyin,et al.Comprehensive Evaluation of Introduction and Screening of New Cucumber Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Northern Horticulture,2022,(23):21-28.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20221059]

点击复制

基于主成分分析的黄瓜新品种引进筛选综合评价

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S] 卷: 期数: 2022年23 页码: 21-28 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-12-15

Title:: Comprehensive Evaluation of Introduction and Screening of New Cucumber Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis

作者:: 王丹丹1; 李燕1; 张庆银1; 齐连芬1; 李军虎2; 师建华1; （1.石家庄市农林科学研究院，河北石家庄 050041；2.河北省科技创新服务中心，河北石家庄 050000）

Author(s):: WANG Dandan1; LI Yan1; ZHANG Qingyin1; QI Lianfen1; LI Junhu2; SHI Jianhua1; (1.Shijiazhuang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences，Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050041；2.The Science and Technology Innovation Service Center of Hebei Province，Shijiazhuang，Hebei 050000)

关键词:: 主成分分析; 黄瓜; 筛选; 综合评价

Keywords:: principal component analysis; cucumber; screen; comprehensive evaluation

DOI:: 10.11937/bfyy.20221059

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 以天津市农业科学院黄瓜研究所的黄瓜新品种为试材，采用主成分分析方法，研究了黄瓜的生长指标、品质指标、光合指标、产量指标等21项指标对12个黄瓜新品种的影响，以期筛选出适宜石家庄地区种植的黄瓜新品种。结果表明：变异系数最大的是可溶性糖含量，为59.70%，株高、茎粗、叶面积、瓜条长度、瓜横径、可溶性固形物、胞间CO2浓度、最大光化学效率的变异系数均较小，分别为8.44%、7.38%、9.65%、7.80%、4.87%、9.90%、3.92%、3.36%，均小于10%。对这21项农艺性状进行相关性分析，各性状至少与其它1个性状存在极显著或显著相关。产量与叶绿素相对含量呈极显著正相关，说明产量主要取决于光合作用。通过主成分分析，得到6个主成分，综合了83.825%的原始信息，前6个主成分的函数表达式及综合评价标准Y=0.296 32Y1+0.156 39Y2+0.147 52Y3+0.095 09Y4+0.080 46Y5+0.062 46Y6，得到12个黄瓜品种的综合得分，品种10（‘津优186’）的得分最高，因此‘津优186’最适宜石家庄地区种植，为黄瓜种植者提供了天津黄瓜新品种引进的参考依据。

Abstract:: Taking the new cucumber varieties from the Cucumber Research Institute of Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences as the test material，the principal component analysis method was used to study the comprehensive analysis method of the main agronomic characters of cucumber，and the growth index，quality index，photosynthetic index，yield of cucumber.The effects of 21 indicators on 12 new cucumber varieties were selected,in order to screen out new cucumber varieties suitable for planting in Shijiazhuang area.The results showed that the largest coefficient of variation was the soluble sugar content，which was 59.70%，plant height，stem diameter，leaf area，fruit length，fruit diameter，soluble solids，intercellular CO2 concentration，and fluorescence maximum were all small，8.44%，7.38%，9.65%，7.80%，4.87%，9.90%，3.92%，and 3.36%，respectively，all less than 10%.Correlation analysis of these 21 agronomic traits showed that each trait was extremely significantly or significantly correlated with at least 1 other trait.The yield and the chlorophyll content were extremely significantly positively correlated，indicating that the yield mainly depends on photosynthesis.Through principal component analysis，6 principal components were obtained，which synthesized 83.825% of the original information，the function expressions and comprehensive evaluation criteria of the first 6 principal components was Y=0.296 32Y1+0.156 39Y2+0.147 52Y3+0.095 09Y4+0.080 46Y5+0.062 46Y6，the comprehensive score of the 12 cucumber varieties was obtained.Variety 10，that was ‘Jinyou 186’，had the highest score.Therefore，‘Jinyou 186’ was the most suitable variety for planting in Shijiazhuang area，and the result provided cucumber growers with a reference for the introduction of new varieties of Tianjin cucumber.

参考文献/References:

[1]师建华,李燕,王丹丹,等.日光温室黄瓜冬春茬精量水肥栽培技术[J].中国瓜菜,2019,32(3):64-65.[2]郭曼霞,汤坤源.秋延黄瓜品种引进比较试验[J].上海蔬菜,2018(4):10-12.[3]高晶霞,杨冬艳,颜秀娟,等.日光温室早春茬黄瓜品种引进筛选试验[J].黑龙江农业科学,2016(4):57-59.[4]张凡.日光温室黄瓜连作土壤和基质微生物多样性与有机质组分关系研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.[5]孙健.河北省黄瓜生产及全要素生产率研究[D].保定:河北农业大学,2019.[6]陈林,曹振强,梁肇均,等.黄瓜种质资源农艺性状多样性分析[J].广东农业科学,2021,48(6):15-22.[7]于娅,王娜,王飞,等.黄瓜种质资源农艺性状评价[J].东北农业科学,2020,45(5):75-81.[8]史建磊,陈先知,黄宗安,等.华南型黄瓜主要农艺性状遗传多样性评价[J].核农学报,2016,30(10):1914-1924.[9]师建华,齐连芬,王丹丹,等.不同防控措施对温室番茄品质、产量及发病率的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(4):88-95.[10]王丹丹,师建华,李燕,等.基于主成分与聚类分析的辣椒主要农艺性状评价[J].中国瓜菜,2021,34(2):47-53.[11]张薇薇,张秀玲.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的苹果香气成分比较及品种分类研究[J].食品工业科技,2018,39(17):217-224.[12]黄小晶,牛锐敏,沈甜,等.基于主成分分析评价整形方式对不同成熟期‘梅鹿辄’葡萄品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(24):25-32.[13]荆瑞勇,卫佳琪,王丽艳,等.基于主成分分析的不同水稻品种品质综合评价[J].食品科学,2020,41(24):179-184.[14]严圭,李辉婕,华之梦,等.基于主成分分析的芝麻品质综合评价[J].江西农业大学学报,2020,42(6):1139-1150.[15]纪洪亭,王勇,曾燕楠,等.基于主成分分析评价不同类型肥料对向日葵穴盘苗素质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(29):100-106.[16]裴孝伯,李世诚,张福墁,等.温室黄瓜叶面积计算及其与株高的相关性研究[J].中国农学通报,2005,21(8):80-82.[17]赵世杰,史国安,董新纯.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2002.[18]牛海龙,刘红欣,李伟堂,等.灰色关联度分析法在花生品种综合评价上的应用[J].东北农业科学,2017,42(5):20-24.[19]荆绍凌,陈亚芹,张亚辉,等.吉林省主栽耐密玉米杂交种综合评价[J].吉林农业科学,2014,39(5):1-4,13.[20]仲义,鄂成林,孙发明,等.大豆农艺性状和品质性状间相关性分析[J].吉林农业科学,2012,37(2):1-3.[21]齐连芬,王丹丹,牛瑞生,等.基于主成分分析的温室番茄最佳有机肥与微生物菌剂配比[J].北方园艺,2019(1):7-13.[22]公丽艳,孟宪军,刘乃侨,等.基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(13):276-285.[23]杨瑞环,刘殿林,哈玉洁,等.黄瓜早熟及丰产性与主要农艺性状的相关性分析[J].华北农学报,2005,20(5):34-37.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈琳琳,吴瑞姣,李光伟,等.苹果属植物不同居群分类性状的变异性分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(13):6.
　CHEN Lin-lin,WU Rui-jiao,LI Guang-wei,et al.The Variability Analysis of Malus Mill.Taxonomic Character From Different Population[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):6.
[2]李亚芹,郑根昌.冬棚黄瓜的氮磷钾肥配施效应分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(12):146.
　LI Ya-qin,ZHENG Gen-chang. Effect Analysis of Application of N,P and K Fertilizers on Cucumber in Winter Plastic Greenhouses [J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):146.
[3]由玉卿,秦智伟,周秀艳,等.黄瓜果实中丙醇二酸含量的配合力分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(10):19.
　YOU Yu-qing,QIN Zhi-wei,ZHOU Xiu-yan,et al.Analysis on Combining Ability of Tartronic Acid Content in Cucumber[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):19.
[4]张秋萍,祁红英,张珏,等.丛枝菌根制剂对黄瓜幼苗生长的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(14):37.
　ZHANG Qiu-ping,QI Hong-ying,ZHANG Yu,et al.Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Agent on Growth of Cucumber Seedling[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):37.
[5]韩志平,张海霞,刘渊,等.NaCl胁迫对不同品种黄瓜种子萌发特性的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(01):1.
　HAN Zhi-ping,ZHANG Hai-xia,LIU Yuan,et al.Effects of NaCl Stress on the Germination Characteristics of Different Varieties of Cucumber Seeds[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):1.
[6]王昶童,曹刚强,梁丛敏,等.黄瓜NBS类抗病基因类似物的生物信息学分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(14):101.
　WANG Chang-tong,CAO Gang-qiang,LIANG Cong-min,et al.Bioinformatics Analysis of the NBS Resistance Gene Analogs in Cucumber[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(23):101.
[7]张瑞芬,李红岭,李新旭,等.优比胶囊不同使用方法对黄瓜生长及产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(17):4.
　ZHANG Rui-fen,LI Hong-ling,LI Xin-xu,et al.Effect of Different Usage of UB Capsule on Growth and Yield of Cucumber[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):4.
[8]张雪艳,李堃,马丽娟,等.Ca2+调控对黄瓜幼苗耐盐性生理指标的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):5.
　ZHANG Xue-yan,LI Kun,MA Li-juan,et al.Effects of Calcium Regulation on the Physiological Properties of Cucumber Under Salt Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):5.
[9]杨延杰,林多.邻苯二甲酸对蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长及根系形态的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):9.
　YANG Yan-jie,LIN Duo.Effects of Phthalic Acid on Seed Germination，Seedling Growth and Root Morphology of Cucumber and Radish[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):9.
[10]张建祥,贾利元.越冬茬黄瓜结瓜期管理技术[J].北方园艺,2013,37(13):63.
　ZHANG Jian-xiang,JIA Li-yuan.Management Techniques of Overwintering Cucumber During the Fruiting Period[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(23):63.

备注/Memo

第一作者简介：王丹丹（1991-），女，硕士，农艺师，现主要从事设施蔬菜栽培等研究工作。E-mail：634086885@qq.com.责任作者：师建华（1966-），女，本科，研究员，现主要从事工厂化育苗和设施栽培等研究工作。E-mail：13785101151@163.com.基金项目：石家庄市科学技术研究与发展计划资助项目（211490144A）。收稿日期：2022-03-21

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-20