[1]李燕青,车升国,李壮,等.粪肥类型影响苹果苗定植成活率因素初探[J].北方园艺,2019,43(07):101-106.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20182270]
　LI Yanqing,CHE Shengguo,LI Zhuang,et al.Study on the Factors Influencing the Survival Rate of Apple Sapling by Manure Types[J].Northern Horticulture,2019,43(07):101-106.[doi:10.11937/bfyy.20182270]
点击复制

粪肥类型影响苹果苗定植成活率因素初探

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S] 卷: 43卷 期数: 2019年07 页码: 101-106 栏目: 出版日期: 2019-04-15
Title:
Study on the Factors Influencing the Survival Rate of Apple Sapling by Manure Types
作者:
李燕青1; 车升国2; 李壮1; 温延臣3; 程存刚1; 陈艳辉1
（1.中国农业科学院 果树研究所/农业部园艺作物种质资源利用重点实验室/辽宁省落叶果树矿质营养与肥料高效利用重点实验室，辽宁 兴城 125100；2.菏泽市果树技术站，山东 菏泽 274000；3.中国农业科学院 农业资源与农业区划研究所，北京 100081）
Author(s):
LI Yanqing1; CHE Shengguo2; LI Zhuang1; WEN Yanchen3; CHENG Cungang1; CHEN Yanhui1
(1.Institute of Pomology,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources Utilization of Horticulture Crops, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Mineral Nutrition and Efficient Fertilization for Deciduous Fruit,Xingcheng，Liaoning 125100；2.Heze Foresty Bureau，Heze，Shandong 274000；3.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning，CAAS，Beijing 100081)
关键词:
粪肥类型; 苹果; 成活率; 土壤碱解氮
Keywords:
manure type; apple; survival rate; soil alkaline nitrogen
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20182270
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以“嘎啦”/“SH38”/“山丁子”为试材，采用盆栽试验，研究了粪肥施用标准对苹果树苗定植成活率的影响，以期为不同类型粪肥的科学利用提供参考依据。结果表明：苹果树苗定植过程中，鸡粪、牛粪、猪粪、羊粪处理幼树成活率差异明显。等质量处理时，鸡粪处理死亡率最高，为75%，猪粪处理全部成活；等碳量处理时，鸡粪和羊粪处理死亡率最高，均为37.5%，牛粪处理全部成活；等养分（全氮）处理时，鸡粪处理的幼树全部死亡，牛粪处理全部成活。鸡粪、牛粪、猪粪、羊粪施入后明显影响土壤pH、电导率、水溶性钠和土壤碱解氮。4种类肥以不同标准投入土壤后，羊粪对土壤pH、土壤电导率和土壤水溶性钠离子含量的提高幅度最大，而鸡粪对土壤中碱解氮含量影响最大，显著高于牛粪、猪粪、羊粪处理。相关性分析表明，土壤碱解氮对苹果树苗定植死亡率影响最大，其次是土壤电导率，水溶性钠离子和土壤pH影响最小。因此，鸡粪处理土壤中高碱解氮含量是造成苹果树苗高死亡率的原因。
Abstract:
‘Gala’/‘SH38’/‘Malus baccata Brokh’ were adopted to study survival rate of transplanted apple sapling with applying different type of manures in order to provide reference for scientific utilization of non-type manure.The results showed that significant difference was existed among manure types on the survival rate of trees.Applied the same amount of manure at weight，the tree of mortality was the highest(75%) with chicken manure treatment，while all trees survived at pig manure treatment；at the equal carbon treatments，the chicken manure and sheep manure had the highest mortality rate of 37.5%，while all trees survived at cow manure treatment.When nitrogen quantity was the same，all trees died at chicken manure treatment，but trees survived at cow manure treatment.After chicken manure，cow manure，pig manure and sheep manure were applied into soil，the soil pH，electrical conductivity，water-soluble sodium and soil alkaline nitrogen were affected significantly.The highest increasing range of soil pH，electrical conductivity，water-soluble sodium were obtained with the sheep manure，while chicken manure treatment got the greatest effect on alkaline nitrogen content in soil than cow，pig，and sheep manure.The most important factor which influenced tree survival was the alkaline nitrogen content，and the electrical conductivity was another reason，but water-soluble sodium and soil pH had a little effect on tree survival.In conclusion，high alkaline nitrogen content in soil was the reason of the apple tree high mortality rate.

参考文献/References:

[1]中国人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴(2017年)[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2017.[2]张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):915-924.[3]ZHU Z L,CHEN D L.Nitrogen fertilizer use in China-contributions to food production，impacts on the environment and best management strategies[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2002,63:117-127.[4]CHE S G,ZHAO B Q,LI Y T,et al.Review grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in rice production regions in China[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2015,14:2456-2466.[5]GUO J H,LIU X J,ZHANG Y,et al.Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J].Science,2010,327:1008-1010.[6]ZHAO B Q,LI X Y,LIU H,et al.Results from long-term fertilizer experiments in China:The risk of groundwater pollution by nitrate[J].NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences,2011,58:177-183.[7]李燕青.不同类型有机肥与化肥配施的农学和环境效应研究[M].北京:中国农业科学院,2016.[8]张田,卜美东,耿维.中国畜禽粪便污染现状及产沼气潜力[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(5):1241-1249.[9]王成红.畜禽粪便施用最大量磷素指标的确定[D].扬州:扬州大学,2009.[10]孟安华.牛粪有机肥培肥土壤的机理及不同作物的激发效应[D].沈阳:吉林农业大学,2015.[11]赵佐平,同延安,刘芬,等.长期不同施肥处理对苹果产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013，24(11):3091-3098.[12]罗华,李敏,胡大刚,等.不同有机肥对肥城桃果实产量及品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(4):955-964.[13]骆坤.黑土碳氮及其组分对长期施肥的响应[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2012.[14]WANG J,WANG X,XU M,et al.Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2015,102:371-381[15]ZHANG D Q,HUI D F,LUO Y Q,et al.Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems:Global patterns and controlling factors[J].Journal of Plant Ecology,2008(1):85-93.[16]赵佐平,同延安,高义民,等.不同肥料配比对富士苹果产量及品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(5):1130-1135.[17]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.[18]赵成爱.工厂化养殖鸡粪的成分及肥效研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学,2005.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹慧,姜倩倩,张保仁,等.节水养根处理对苹果枝叶生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(04):1.
[2]王贵平,王金政,薛晓敏,等.叶面喷施甜菜碱对干旱胁迫下苹果幼树[J].北方园艺,2014,38(12):10.
　WANG Gui-ping,WANG Jin-zheng,XUE Xiao-min,et al.Effect of Spraying Glycinebetaine on Physiological Responses of Apple Young Trees Under Drought Stress[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(07):10.
[3]李 莹,任亚梅,马学敏,等.1-MCP处理结合不同贮藏条件对苹果常温货架品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2014,38(11):137.
　LI Ying,REN Ya-mei,MA Xue-min,et al.Effects of 1-MCP Treatment With Different Storage Conditions on Quality of Apple During Shelf Life at Room Temperature[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(07):137.
[4]党建美,胡清玉,张 瑜,等.炭疽菌叶枯病在我国苹果产区的发生分布及趋势分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(10):177.
　DANG Jian-mei,HU Qing-yu,ZHANG Yu,et al.The Occurrence Trend and Distribution of Apple Glomerella Leaf Spot in China[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(07):177.
[5]解贝贝,沙广利,戴洪义,等.六种无融合生殖砧木对‘嘎拉’苹果果实大小和品质的影响[J].北方园艺,2013,37(17):23.
　XIE Bei-bei,SHA Guang-li,DAI Hong-yi,et al.Effect of Six No Fusion Reproductive Rootstocks on the Fruit Size and Quality of ‘Gala’ Apple[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(07):23.
[6]冯娟娟,刘军弟,霍学喜.世界主要落叶水果主产国生产与贸易预测分析[J].北方园艺,2014,38(04):195.
[7]吕天星,王铭,伊凯.苹果杂种实生苗叶片性状遗传趋势研究[J].北方园艺,2013,37(14):8.
　LV Tian-xing,WANG Ming,YI Kai.Study on Genetic Trends of Leaf Traits in Apple Hybrid Seedling[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(07):8.
[8]史星雲,王立新,王亚杰,等.陕西省苹果主栽品种品质差异及相关性分析[J].北方园艺,2013,37(14):11.
　SHI Xing-yun,WANG Li-xin,WANG Ya-jie,et al.Quality and Correlation Analysis of the Main Apple Cultivars in Shaanxi Province[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(07):11.
[9]隗晓雯,郭静,王菲,等.不同矮化砧木叶片酶活性与内源激素含量的差异[J].北方园艺,2013,37(14):16.
　WEI Xiao-wen,GUO Jing,WANG Fei,et al.Difference of Enzyme Activity and the Content of Endogenous Hormones in the Leaves of Different Apple Dwarfing Rootstocks[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(07):16.
[10]刘 君,刁永强,陈淑英,等.伊犁河谷不同苹果品种苗木冻害调查及分析[J].北方园艺,2013,37(23):34.
　LIU Jun,DIAO Yong-qiang,CHEN Shu-ying,et al.An Investigation and Analysis of Freeze Injury of Different Varieties Apple Seedlings in Ili Area[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(07):34.

备注/Memo

第一作者简介：李燕青（1987-），男，博士，助理研究员，研究方向为果树营养与高效施肥。E-mail：liyanqing@caas.cn.责任作者：李壮（1975-），男，博士，副研究员，现主要从事果树营养与高效施肥等研究工作。E-mail：lizhuangcaas@163.com.基金项目：国家重点研发计划资助项目（2016YFD0201100）；辽宁省重点研发计划资助项目（2017301001）。收稿日期：2018-10-08

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-13