SHAO Da-wei,WU Dian-ming,DING Jin-hua,et al.Accessibility Assessment of Green Space in the Central City of Nanjing[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(05):78-81.
南京中心城区绿地可达性分析
- Title:
- Accessibility Assessment of Green Space in the Central City of Nanjing
- 文章编号:
- 1001-0009（2014）05-0078-04
- Keywords:
- green space; accessibility; Nanjing; the central city
- 分类号:
- S 731.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以遥感数据为基础，采用GIS空间分析的费用距离加权方法，对南京中心城区绿地可达性进行了分析。结果表明：南京中心城区绿地整体可达性较高，逾九成居民步行约3 min即可到达一块绿地，其余亦不超过10 min。其中，附属绿地可达性最好，超过90%的市民采用任何交通方式10 min内均可到访附属绿地；公共绿地可达性次之，70%的居民步行10 min可到达公共绿地，采用非机动车或机动车则10 min到达公共绿地的居民可达90%以上的比例；生态防护绿地服务面积较大，但分布偏远，居民可享用性相对较差，生产性绿地景观整体可达性最差。建议采取增加附属绿地规模、完善公共绿地功能、严格保护控制生态防护绿地和生产绿地适度规模等举措，有层次、有步骤的提高绿地服务便捷程度。
- Abstract:
- According to remote sensing data，green space accessibility of Nanjing urban area were analyzed using the cost weighted distance method of GIS spatial analysis.The results showed that the overall green space accessibility was good.More than 90% of the urban population could walk to green space in 3 minutes，and the rest need no more than 10 minutes.Attached green space had the best accessibility among green space types.No matter taking of any kinds of transportation，90% of citizens could reach the affiliated green space in 10 minutes.70% of citizens could walk to public green space in 10 minutes.However，the population proportion was 90% with the bicycle or motor vehicle.Ecological buffer green space had the larger service area，but poor service ability for residents.Productive plantation area accessibility was the worst among green space types.In order to improve the service ability，the suggestion which includes increasing affiliated green space area，improving the public green space function，protecting ecological buffer green space and productive plantation area strictly would be put into execution systematically.
参考文献/References:
[1]丁向阳,董桂萍.论生态城市绿地系统的综合效益[J].地域研究与开发,2005,24(3):53-56. [2]尹海伟,孔繁花,宗跃光.城市绿地可达性与公平性评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3376-3383. [3]马琳,陆玉麒.基于路网结构的城市绿地景观可达性研究-以南京市主城区公园绿地为例[J].中国园林，2011(7):92-96. [4]俞孔坚,段铁武,李迪华,等.景观可达性作为衡量城市绿地系统功能指标的评价方法与案例[J].城市规划,1999(8):8-11． [5]Mallick R K，Routray J K.Identification and accessibility analysis is of rural service centers in Kendrapara District，Orissa，India：a GIS-based application[J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation，2001，3(1)，99-105. [6]宋秀华.城市公园绿地社会服务功能评价研究[D].济南：山东农业大学，2011. [7]胡志斌,何兴元,陆庆轩,等.基于GIS 的绿地景观可达性研究-以沈阳市为例[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版)，2005,21(6)：671-675. [8]马林兵,曹小曙.基于GIS 的城市公共绿地景观可达性评价方法[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版)，2006,45(6)：111-115. [9]Handy S L，Niemeier D A.Measuring accessibility：an exploration of issues and alternatives[J].Environment and Planning，1997，29(7)：1175-1194. [10]刘常富,李小马,韩东.城市公园可达性研究方法与关键问题[J].生态学报,2010，30(19)：5381-5390. [11]邵大伟.城市开放空间格局的演变、机制及优化研究[D].南京：南京师范大学,2011.
相似文献/References:
[1]韩雪,赵林森.昆明官渡古镇法定寺周边绿地生态效益分析[J].北方园艺,2012,36(03):86.
HAN Xue,ZHAO Lin-sen.Analysis on Ecological Benefits of the Greenspace Around Fading Temple in Guandu Ancient Town of Kunming City[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(05):86.
[2]姜魁,金研铭.长春市朝阳区绿地土壤微生物变化研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(05):154.
JIANG Kui,JIN Yan-ming.Study on Green Land Soil Microbial Change of Chaoyang District Changchun City[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(05):154.
[3]巩如英,赵美微,杜洁,等.花境在秦皇岛园林绿地中的应用现状调查研究[J].北方园艺,2012,36(08):94.
GONG Ru-ying,ZHAO Mei-wei,DU Jie,et al.Study on Application Status of Flower Border into Garden Greenland in Qinhuangdao[J].Northern Horticulture,2012,36(05):94.
[4]封顺蕾,曹传生,刘慧民.城市园林雨水利用初探[J].北方园艺,2013,37(16):92.
FENGShun-lei,CAOChuan-sheng,LIUHui-min.DiscussiononUtilizationofRainwaterinUrbanGreenSpace[J].Northern Horticulture,2013,37(05):92.
[5]周琦,辜彬.草坪踩踏行为与园路设计[J].北方园艺,2014,38(18):99.
ZHOU Qi,GU Bin.Lawn Trample Behaviour and Landscape Path Design[J].Northern Horticulture,2014,38(05):99.
备注/Memo
第一作者简介：邵大伟（1982-），男，博士，讲师，现主要从事风景园林与城乡规划设计等研究工作。E-mail:shdw-123@163.com.