|Table of Contents|

Establishment of Quality Evaluation Model of Phalaenopsis Based on Principal Component Analysis

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年6
Page:
61-68
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Establishment of Quality Evaluation Model of Phalaenopsis Based on Principal Component Analysis
Author(s):
LI YandongLI YunxingYIN YimingZHAO GenZHANG FeixueSHI Xingyun
(Huzhou Academy of Agricultural Science/Key Laboratory of Huzhou Agricultural Germplasm Resources Innovation and Application,Huzhou,Zhejiang 313000)
Keywords:
Phalaenopsisprincipal component analysiscluster analysisregression analysis
PACS:
S 682.31
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20233762
Abstract:
The 42 Phalaenopsis samples were used as experimental materials and determined 22 morphological indices included plant size,leaf length,leaf width and other traits.The methods of descriptive statistical analysis,correlation analysis,principal component analysis and regression analysis were conducted to analyze and evaluate,and then the quality evaluation model was created,in order to provide reference for the high quality development of Phalaenopsis industry.The results showed that there were differences in 22 morphological indices among different cultivars,and the degree of dispersion was variation.The range of the coefficient of variance was from 16.12% to 68.73%.Correlation analysis showed that there were positive or negative correlation among the 22 indicators.Five principal components were obtained with a cumulative contribution rate of 88.242% after principal component analysis.The comprensive scores could well distinguish the quality differences between different samples.Finally,the quality evaluation prediction model of Phalaenopsis was established by the stepwise regression analysis as follows,Y=-10.109+1.331X16+0.017X13+0.030X5+0.058X2+0.163X6+0.609X22-0.014X19,in which petal length,the L* of middle sepal,peduncle length,leaf length,peduncle diameter,the middle lobe width of labial flap and the a* of petal are important indicators for evaluating its quality.

References:

[1]刘仲健,王洁雨,奥拉夫·格鲁斯,等.世界蝴蝶兰属植物[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2021.[2]朱娇,李心风,董飞,等.黄花蝴蝶兰品种间杂交后代遗传性状分析[J].北方园艺,2023(10):57-64.[3]吴婷,贾瑞冬,杨树华,等.蝴蝶兰多倍体育种研究进展与展望[J].园艺学报,2022,49(2):448-462.[4]陈和明,吕复兵,李佐,等.蝴蝶兰属间杂交育种研究进展[J].中国农业大学学报,2022,27(9):125-135.[5]杨镇明,陈和明,吕复兵,等.蝴蝶兰新品种‘巧红’[J].园艺学报,2023,50(1):135-136.[6]白瑞琴,郭燕忠,孟文慧,等.蝴蝶兰品种‘大辣椒’新优栽培基质的筛选[J].北方园艺,2023(11):68-74.[7]吴小梅,黄灵,张阁,等.外源激素对微型蝴蝶兰双梗发生率及花梗发育的影响[J].种子,2022,41(12):138-143.[8]ZHANG H,HE D,LI X,et al.The establishment of rapid propagation system of ‘RED SUN’ Phalaenopsis aphrodite[J].Sustainability,2022,14(22):15305.[9]高晓芬,吴小梅,郝春磊,等.基于红蓝光质配比的小花型蝴蝶兰组培苗生长调控[J].种子,2023,42(5):40-45.[10]DAEMS S,CEUSTERS N,VALCKE R,et al.Effects of chilling on the photosynthetic performance of the CAM orchid Phalaenopsis[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2022(13):981581.[11]马晓华,胡青荻,张庆良,等.2个蝴蝶兰品种对低温胁迫的生理响应[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2021,41(4):72-78.[12]何荆洲,范继征,曾艳华,等.蝴蝶兰“大辣椒”APETALA1基因的克隆及表达[J].北方园艺,2021(3):83-90.[13]张加强,史小华,刘慧春,等.基于转录组学的不同色系蝴蝶兰花色苷差异积累分析[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(14):4530-4542.[14]XU Q,XIA M,HE G,et al.New insights into the influence of NHX-type Cation/H+ antiporter on flower color in Phalaenopsis orchids[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2022,279:153857.[15]翟永杰,胡东阳,苑朝,等.基于视觉伺服的蝴蝶兰种苗切割系统设计与试验[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(6):148-156.[16]李强,何彩,史星雲,等.不同种源黑果枸杞果实游离氨基酸的品质评价[J].经济林研究,2023,41(1):26-35.[17]BRO R,SMILDE A K.Principal component analysis[J].Analytical Methods,2014,6(9):2812-2831.[18]王思威,孙海滨,常虹,等.基于主成分分析综合评价白糖罂荔枝果实品质[J].果树学报,2022,39(4):610-620.[19]张芳,王晓红,罗泽虎,等.贵州省野生桑果实品质指标的主成分和聚类分析[J].果树学报,2022,39(4):593-601.[20]周艳超,薛坤,葛海燕,等.基于主成分与聚类分析的樱桃番茄品质综合评价[J].浙江农业学报,2021,33(12):2320-2329.[21]过聪,关伟,曾祥国,等.现代月季品种表型性状分析与评价[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(24):4632-4646.[22]尹世华,李传林,黄晓霞,等.月季花部性状表型多样性研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2022,42(4):38-47.[23]许兰杰,梁慧珍,余永亮,等.菊花种质综合评价体系构建及优异种质筛选[J].北方园艺,2022(12):55-63.[24]刘艺平,张一琪,苏少文,等.不同品种荷花耐盐碱性评价及鉴定指标筛选[J].浙江农业学报,2023,35(1):103-111.[25]陈剑锋,钟声远,陈宇华,等.基于花表型性状的蝴蝶兰品种资源多样性研究[J].热带作物学报,2023,44(3):494-505.[26]汤楷,江秀娜,刘燕榕,等.基于加权主成分分析的蝴蝶兰商品性综合评价[J].热带农业科学,2020,40(7):103-107.[27]陈和明,吕复兵,李佐,等.蝴蝶兰品质性状综合评价体系的构建[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(8):83-94.[28]中华人民共和国农业部.植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南 蝴蝶兰:NY/T 2230—2012[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2013.[29]史星雲,李强,张军,等.滴灌条件下水肥耦合对酿酒葡萄生长发育及果实品质的影响[J].西北农业学报,2019,28(2):225-236.[30]张鹏,王江民,管俊娇,等.蝴蝶兰品种数量性状与分组性状的DUS判定[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(11):81-88.[31]徐东旭,姜翠棉,宗绪晓.蚕豆种质资源形态标记遗传多样性分析[J].植物遗传资源学报,2010,11(4):399-406.[32]宋一岚,张英杰,孙纪霞,等.蝴蝶兰70份资源观赏性状综合评价[J].热带作物学报,2020,41(1):43-48.[33]杨阳.蝴蝶兰种质资源的综合评价[D].南京:南京农业大学,2012.[34]刘燕榕,江秀娜,汤楷,等.4个小花型蝴蝶兰品种在粤东地区的种植评价[J].现代农业科技,2020(15):141-142.[35]曲晓慧,张宁宁,刘晨,等.不同栽培基质配比与施肥模式对蝴蝶兰生长发育的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2023,64(9):2191-2196.[36]袁必局,李香,张叶,等.不同基质材料对迷你型蝴蝶兰生长及开花性状的影响[J].分子植物育种,2023,21(20):6933-6938.[37]曲晓慧,张宁宁,刘晨,等.不同低温与肥水处理对蝴蝶兰生长及开花的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(12):168-172.[38]王世尧,杨书才,蒋栓丽,等.蝴蝶兰响应低温胁迫研究进展[J].北方园艺,2023(4):124-131.[39]孙镜开.矿源腐植酸和生化腐植酸对蝴蝶兰生长发育和抗冷性的影响[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2022.[40]陈业臻,季京京,蒋励,等.不同氮磷钾配比对蝴蝶兰开花的影响[J].亚热带植物科学,2022,51(6):451-458.[41]张英杰,李奥,吕云飞,等.蝴蝶兰成花过程内源激素含量的变化和植物生长调节剂的作用[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2022,30(1):104-110.[42]赖思婷,丰锋,陈桦洁,等.6-BA对火凤凰蝴蝶兰成花诱导的影响[J].广东农业科学,2021,48(5):50-56.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-04-11