|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Ratio of Raw Materials on Nutritional Quality of Stropharia rugosoannulata

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年15
Page:
67-76
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Ratio of Raw Materials on Nutritional Quality of Stropharia rugosoannulata
Author(s):
YANG Jianjie; LI Tong; LIU Mingjun; GENG Xinjun
(Institute of Vegetables,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Lanzhou,Gansu 730070)
Keywords:
Stropharia rugosoannulata; sawdust addition amount; nutritional quality; principal component analysis; membership function analysis
PACS:
S646.1+9
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20260315
Abstract:
Taking corncob and sawdust as test materials,five different proportions of corncob and sawdust formulas were designed by single factor randomized block design.The effects of different formula substrates on the nutritional quality of crude polysaccharide,crude protein and amino acid of Stropharia rugosoannulata products were studied,in order to provide references for the cultivation of Stropharia rugosoannulata with agricultural and forestry crop straw.The results showed that after adding sawdust,the conventional nutrients (crude fat,crude polysaccharide,crude protein,ash),mineral elements (potassium,calcium,sodium,iron,zinc,selenium),amino acids,texture (chewiness,adhesion,elasticity,hardness,cohesiveness) of the fruiting body of Stropharia rugosoannulata were better than those of the control group.Combined with principal component analysis and membership function analysis,the quality of T1 treatment was the best,followed by T2 and T3 treatment,and T4 was the worst.When 12.5% sawdust was added to the corncob culture material,the quality of the fruiting body was the best,and the quality was worse without sawdust or with more sawdust.

References:

［1］HUANG L,SI C,HE C M,et al.The rise of Stropharia rugosoannulata industry in China:Current state and prospects［J］.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2025,109(1):188.［2］贺国强,魏金康,张丽红,等.四种营养添加物对大球盖菇营养成分及重金属含量的影响［J］.北方园艺,2025(7):75-80.［3］HUANG L,HE C,SI C,et al.Nutritional,bioactive,and flavor components of giant Stropharia (Stropharia rugoso-annulata):A review［J］.Journal of Fungi,2023,9(8):792.［4］高欢,包怡红.大球盖菇保健功能与保鲜加工研究进展［J］.食品与发酵工业,2017,43(12):277-282.［5］WANG Q,YANG X,ZHU J.Nutritional and therapeutic potential of Stropharia rugosoannulata and Macrolepiota procera:From composition to health-promoting effect［J］.Journal of Fungi,2025,11(4):259.［6］谭思琪,黄佳佳,曾宇宇,等.大球盖菇菌株木屑降解能力差异的分子机制研究［J］.北方园艺,2025(21):16-26.［7］陈怡彤.秸秆基质类型对大球盖菇农艺性状及营养品质的影响［D］.武汉:华中农业大学,2023.［8］段好凯,刘晓,郝海波,等.大球盖菇菌株降解稻秸秆能力及其酶活性分析［J］.北方园艺,2025(14):87-94.［9］任文斌.栽培基质和贮藏时间对干大球盖菇风味的影响及素肠开发［D］.武汉:华中农业大学,2022.［10］黄坚雄,袁淑娜,潘剑,等.以橡胶木屑为主要基质栽培的大球盖菇与香菇、平菇的主要营养成分差异［J］.热带作物学报,2018,39(8):1625-1629.［11］王米雪,圣志存,陈晓兰.大球盖菇发酵菌丝体多糖提取条件优化与结构分析［J］.北方园艺,2020(1):111-116.［12］高敏,尚学钰,王子璇,等.不同栽培基质大球盖菇子实体多糖化学组成及抗氧化活性相关性研究［J］.北方园艺,2023(10):121-128.［13］LI X,ZHANG Z,WANG L,et al.Three-phase extraction of polysaccharide from Stropharia rugosoannulata:Process optimization,structural characterization and bioactivities［J］.Frontiers in Immunology,2023,13:994706.［14］高琛,李文,陈万超,等.3种食用菌蛋白质-多糖复合物的体内外降血脂作用［J］.食品科学,2024,45(24):117-127.［15］高帅平,王安建,田广瑞,等.外源褪黑素对平菇采后生理及挥发性风味物质的影响［J/OL］.食品与发酵工业，(2025-10-09)［2026-01-09］.https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.043889.［16］张波,高婧,王楠楠,等.基于质构仪技术的香菇品质综合研究与评价［J］.食品安全质量检测学报,2025,16(14):213-221.［17］文英杰,刘海伦,姜永华,等.不同品种荔枝游离氨基酸组成分析及综合评价［J］.食品与发酵工业,2025,51(14):343-352.［18］叶雷,张波,杨学圳,等.竹屑替代木屑栽培毛木耳的可行性及其品质综合评价［J］.浙江农业学报,2023,35(6):1416-1426.［19］王亚威,胡桂萍,黄金枝,等.桑枝屑代料栽培香菇蛋白质营养价值评价［J］.食品与发酵工业,2021,47(20):225-231.［20］SURYADI H,JUDONO J J,PUTRI M R,et al.Biodelignification of lignocellulose using ligninolytic enzymes from white-rot fungi［J］.Heliyon,2022,8(2):e08865.［21］苏世贤,李婕,徐彦军,等.食用菌菌丝对菌材分解利用的研究进展［J］.云南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,45(3):760-767.［22］赵彤,曲鹏坤,关颖贤,等.不同基质对富硒大球盖菇的营养品质及蛋白质营养价值的影响［J/OL］.食品工业科技,（2025-08-26）［2026-02-13］.https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040226.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-08-13