|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Cultivation Measures on Salt-alkali Dynamics in the Root Zone and Growth of Pepper in Saline-alkali Soil

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年15
Page:
37-47
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Cultivation Measures on Salt-alkali Dynamics in the Root Zone and Growth of Pepper in Saline-alkali Soil
Author(s):
ZHANG Zheng1; ZHAO Zhixia2; TONG Xiaopeng3; YANG Zhenchao4; ZOU Gaofeng5; DAI Xiongze1
(1.College of Horticulture,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,Hunan 410128;2.Inner Mongolia Bayannur Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015000;3.Inner Mongolia Baotou Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Baotou,Inner Mongolia 014013;4.College of Horticulture and Forestry,Tarim University,Alar,Xinjiang 843300;5.Ningxiang Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Changsha,Hunan 410600)
Keywords:
pepper; saline-alkali soils; plastic-mulched drip irrigation; cultivation measures
PACS:
S641.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20260122
Abstract:
Taking ‘Bola Tianjiao 60’ as the experimental material,mulched drip irrigation (-30 kPa) and non-mulched drip irrigation (-30 kPa) were used as controls.Five treatments were established,included mulched drip irrigation combined with leaching for salt suppression,microbial inoculants,soil amendments,and different soil matric potentials (-25 kPa and -35 kPa).The effects of these treatments on total soil salinity (TS),pH,and pepper growth in the 0-40 cm soil layer of the root zone were investigated,in order to provide references for efficient and high-yield pepper cultivation in saline-alkali land in the Hetao Irrigation District.The results showed that,1)compared with non-mulched drip irrigation,mulched drip irrigation significantly inhibited salt accumulation in the 0-20 cm soil layer;2)mulched drip irrigation combined with soil amendments,microbial inoculants,or a higher soil matric potential (-25 kPa) effectively reduced TS and pH in the rhizosphere,among which the soil amendment showed the most significant salt-reducing effect at the full-bloom stage,while the microbial inoculant had a more persistent effect,and the effects of all measures were mainly concentrated in the 0-20 cm soil layer;3)leaching for salt suppression was only effective in the short term,while soil salinity re-accumulated and pH increased in the later stage;4)the comprehensive evaluation results showed that,compared with single mulched drip irrigation,mulched drip irrigation combined with soil amendments had the best effect,increasing pepper yield by 12.07%.

References:

［1］邹学校,朱凡.辣椒的起源、进化与栽培历史［J］.园艺学报,2022,49(6):1371-1381.［2］邹学校,杨莎,戴雄泽,等.中国辣椒产业快速发展40年回顾与展望［J］.园艺学报,2025,52(1):247-258.［3］邹学校,马艳青,戴雄泽,等.辣椒在中国的传播与产业发展［J］.园艺学报,2020,47(9):1715-1726.［4］王立浩,马艳青,张宝玺.我国辣椒品种市场需求与育种趋势［J］.中国蔬菜,2019(8):1-4.［5］杨劲松,姚荣江,王相平,等.河套平原盐碱地生态治理和生态产业发展模式［J］.生态学报,2016,36(22):7059-7063.［6］王大江,刘昭,路翔,等.植物耐盐机制研究进展及展望［J］.华北农学报,2024,39(5):80-92.［7］周和平,张立新,禹锋,等.我国盐碱地改良技术综述及展望［J］.现代农业科技,2007(11):159-161,164.［8］ZENG W Z,XU C,WU J W,et al.Impacts of salinity and nitrogen on the photosynthetic rate and growth of sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.)［J］.Pedosphere,2014,24(5):635-644.［9］王斌,黄高鉴,刘伟,等.内陆盐碱土水盐动态监测调控及决策系统研究［J］.中国农学通报,2020,36(23):81-87.［10］焦艳平,康跃虎,万书勤,等.干旱区盐碱地滴灌土壤基质势对土壤盐分分布的影响［J］.农业工程学报,2008,24(6):53-58.［11］张青青.银北灌区不同冬灌情景下的水盐运移模拟研究［D］.银川:宁夏大学,2023.［12］王全九,王文焰,汪志荣,等.排水地段土壤盐分变化特征分析［J］.土壤学报,2001,38(2):271-276.［13］孙云云,刘方明,高玉山,等.覆膜滴灌技术研究进展［J］.农业工程,2020,10(3):68-71.［14］DU Y,LIU X F,ZHANG L,et al.Drip irrigation in agricultural saline-alkali land controls soil salinity and improves crop yield:Evidence from a global meta-analysis［J］.Science of the Total Environment,2023,880:163226.［15］CHEN W L,JIN M G,FERR T P A,et al.Soil conditions affect cotton root distribution and cotton yield under mulched drip irrigation［J］.Field Crops Research,2020,249:107743.［16］李毅,王文焰,王全九.论膜下滴灌技术在干旱-半干旱地区节水抑盐灌溉中的应用［J］.灌溉排水,2001,20(2):42-46.［17］王若水,康跃虎,万书勤,等.水分调控对盐碱地土壤盐分与养分含量及分布的影响［J］.农业工程学报,2014,30(14):96-104.［18］田富强,温洁,胡宏昌,等.滴灌条件下干旱区农田水盐运移及调控研究进展与展望［J］.水利学报,2018,49(1):126-135.［19］康跃虎.实用型滴灌灌溉计划制定方法［J］.节水灌溉,2004(3):11-12,15.［20］张体彬,展小云,康跃虎,等.浅层填沙滴灌种植枸杞改良龟裂碱土重度盐碱荒地研究［J］.农业机械学报,2016,47(10):139-149.［21］吴畏,高佩玲,郭祥林,等.微咸水与生物炭协同作用对盐碱土入渗特征及水盐运移的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(2):160-167.［22］叶澜涛,周青云,李松敏,等.滨海盐碱地覆膜和灌溉对玉米盐分离子分布及生物量的影响［J］.干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(4):74-83.［23］张志新.新疆节水灌溉发展态势和滴灌的生态效益:与 “浅谈现代农业节水新概念:可持续节水” 作者商榷(1)［J］.节水灌溉,2008(11):51-54.［24］张万恒,何帅,忠智博,等.膜下滴灌结合暗管排水技术改良新疆盐碱地效果综述［J］.农业工程,2023,13(4):101-107.［25］郭世乾,崔增团,刘妤,等.甘肃省盐碱地改良技术模式试验研究［J］.农业科技与信息,2013(14):24-25.［26］杜雅仙,马凯博,康扬眉,等.脱硫石膏与结构改良剂配合施用对盐碱地土壤的改良和枸杞生长的影响［J］.北方园艺,2018(21):129-135.［27］王莉莉,田军仓,王西娜,等.栽培方式配施改良剂对盐碱地土壤水盐分布及西瓜产量的影响［J］.农业工程学报,2025,41(8):88-96.［28］孙瑞波,章凤玲,宗静雯,等.微生物在盐碱地改良中的作用研究进展［J］.广东农业科学,2025,52(2):14-30.［29］李玉柱,谭智勇,刘艺,等.微生物菌剂对土壤养分及微生物群落结构影响的研究进展［J］.中南农业科技,2024,45(3):222-226,245.［30］袁喜丽,高慧,李磊,等.微生物菌剂对盐碱地农作物产量与品质的影响研究［J］.新农民,2024(1):87-89.［31］赵梓鉴,许旺旺,高晶霞,等.宁南拱棚辣椒连作对土壤养分、酶活性及微生物量的影响［J］.北方园艺,2024(16):73-79.［32］王海银.有机肥替代部分化学氮肥对日光温室辣椒产量、品质和土壤理化性质的影响［J］.北方园艺,2024(18):41-48.［33］杨婷,陈晓冰,许昊,等.辣椒根系影响下的农地土壤水分空间运动分异特征［J］.农业工程学报,2023,39(13):141-150.［34］张雪晨,李越,陈志君,等.膜下滴灌土壤水盐与玉米产量对节水控盐灌溉模式响应的模拟［J］.农业工程学报,2022,38(S1):47-58.［35］刘小京,郭凯,封晓辉,等.农业高效利用盐碱地资源探讨［J］.中国生态农业学报(中英文),2023,31(3):345-353.［36］赵文举,曹伟,吴克倩,等.盐碱地水肥耦合对基质栽培番茄生长与产量品质的影响［J］.排灌机械工程学报,2024,42(6):619-626.［37］梁永辉,王振华,李海强,等.不同改良措施对南疆盐碱土壤特性及玉米和油葵生长的影响［J］.农业资源与环境学报,2024,41(6):1332-1341.［38］李毅.覆膜条件下土壤水、盐、热耦合迁移试验研究［D］.西安:西安理工大学,2002.［39］王斌,马兴旺,单娜娜,等.新疆盐碱地土壤改良剂的选择与应用［J］.干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):111-115.［40］严慧峻,逄焕成,李玉义,等.微生物复混肥对盐碱土及白菜品质改良的影响［J］.中国农学通报,2008,24(12):270-273.［41］陈素英,邵立威,孙宏勇,等.微咸水灌溉对土壤盐分平衡与作物产量的影响［J］.中国生态农业学报,2016,24(8):1049-1058.［42］韩晓宇,万书勤,李晓彬,等.河西走廊辣椒滴灌水盐调控施肥灌溉制度研究［J］.灌溉排水学报,2018,37(12):35-45.［43］孔伟程.覆膜和滴灌湿润比对土壤水热分布及马铃薯生长影响研究［D］.扬州:扬州大学,2021.［44］王海东.滴灌施肥条件下马铃薯水肥高效利用机制研究［D］.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2020.［45］TORABIAN S, ZAHEDI M, KHOSHGOFTAR A H.Effects of foliar spray of two kinds of zinc oxide on the growth and ion concentration of sunflower cultivars under salt stress［J］.Journal of Plant Nutrition,2016(1):172-180.［46］DANG J,LIANG W,WANG G,et al.A preliminary study of the effects of plastic film-mulched raised beds on soil temperature and crop performance of early-sown short-season spring maize (Zea mays L.) in the North China Plain［J］.The Crop Journal,2016,4(4):331-337.［47］黄楠,刘继培,赵跃.蚯蚓粪配施不同土壤改良剂对甜瓜产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2024(3):153-158.［48］邵华伟,崔磊,许咏梅,等.滴施改良剂对新疆盐碱土改良及甜菜产量的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2018(2):49-53.［49］曹巍,高惠嫣,王鑫鑫,等.不同配施肥措施对滨海盐碱地大豆生长和产量的影响［J］.江苏农业科学,2023,51(22):53-60.［50］李金刚,屈忠义,黄永平,等.微咸水膜下滴灌不同灌水下限对盐碱地土壤水盐运移及玉米产量的影响［J］.水土保持学报,2017,31(1):217-223.［51］赵宇龙,李明思,陈绍民,等.滴灌条件下层状土壤滞盐作用的试验研究［J］.灌溉排水学报,2015,34(6):29-34.［52］胡琴,陈为峰,宋希亮,等.不同灌水量对黄河三角洲盐碱地改良效果研究［J］.水土保持学报,2019,33(6):305-310,325.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-08-13