|Table of Contents|

Evaluation of the Grafting Adaptability of Different Pumpkin Rootstocks for Open-field Watermelon in the Hetao Region

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2026年9
Page:
62-68
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Evaluation of the Grafting Adaptability of Different Pumpkin Rootstocks for Open-field Watermelon in the Hetao Region
Author(s):
GAO Ruijie1; MA Jie1; CHEN Cong2; WANG Lijun1; CHEN Yu1; CAI Run1
(1.Bayannur Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science Research Institute,Bayannur,Inner Mongolia 015000;2.College of Horticulture and Forestry,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan，Hubei 430070)
Keywords:
watermelon; pumpkin rootstock; grafting adaptability; principal component analysis
PACS:
S651
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20253991
Abstract:
Taking eight pumpkin triploid varieties (S1-S8),two pumpkin monoploid varieties (S9-S10),and two commercial rootstocks (S11 and CK) as test materials,a comprehensive evaluation method combining principal component analysis and fuzzy mathematical subordinate function was adopted to study the effects of different pumpkin rootstock grafting on the growth adaptability,yield,and fruit quality of watermelon grown in the open field,in order to provide references for optimizing the current situation of scarce pumpkin rootstock varieties dedicated to watermelon grafting in the Hetao region and addressing the issue of watermelon resistance to continuous cropping.The results showed that 18 indicators could be reduced to 6 principal components,with a cumulative contribution rate of 91.487%.Among them,CK ranked seventh with a D value of 0.439;S5 was the best,with a D value of 0.716,and its central soluble solids and sensory evaluation scores were significantly higher than those of CK;S1 ranked second with a D value of 0.671;S7 was the worst,with a D value of only 0.230.In summary,S1 and S5 pumpkin rootstocks exhibited excellent comprehensive performance and could be promoted as suitable rootstocks for watermelon grafting cultivation in the open field in the Hetao region.

References:

［1］于千程.中国西瓜产业发展及其国际竞争力评价分析［J］.北方园艺,2024(24):133-138.［2］郭冰心,王福红,夏咏.中国西瓜价格预测预警研究［J］.北方园艺,2025（23）:131-138.［3］梁莉,李荣富,李登云,等.内蒙古西甜瓜产业发展回顾与展望［C］.开封：纪念全国西瓜甜瓜科研与生产协作50周年暨第12次全国西瓜甜瓜学术研讨会，2009.［4］刘伟.巴彦淖尔地区气候变化对农业的影响［J］.农业与技术,2012,32(11):14.［5］王建国,姜伟,杜金伟,等.内蒙古西甜瓜生产现状及发展对策［J］.内蒙古农业科技,2014(5):110-111.［6］张雁飞.巴彦淖尔市新旧气候平均值比较及对气候评价的影响［J］.农业灾害研究,2019,9(3):78-79.［7］徐佳慧,宋嘉欣,刘颖,等.基于GC-MS技术分析嫁接对西瓜苗期发育的影响［J/OL］.分子植物育种,(2025-10-28)［2025-10-29］.https://link.cnki.net/urlid/46.1068.S.20240910.1420.006.［8］李桂芬,解华云,叶云峰,等.嫁接对秋延后西瓜生长及品质的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2025,38(6):115-119.［9］江姣,贾文红,靳凯业,等.小果型西瓜“京美2K”早春绿色高效设施栽培技术［J］.北方园艺,2024(7):154-157.［10］贺学强,余立云,赵小红,等.宁夏中部干旱带早春嫁接西瓜“一窝两膜”栽培模式［J］.北方园艺,2024(19):151-154.［11］侯晟灿,于玉红,李军华,等.不同类型砧木对小果型西瓜生长及枯萎病抗性的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2025,38(3):68-73.［12］宋宇,张艺洋,陈聪,等.南瓜砧木嫁接对秋季中果型西瓜生长发育和果实品质的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2025,38(8):145-153.［13］孙娜,朱友洲,孙焱鑫,等.不同砧木嫁接对品质番茄植株生长和果实风味的影响［J］.北方园艺,2025(4):38-45.［14］刘修源,车庆辉,常粮,等.‘太秋’嫁接亲和砧木筛选评价［J］.北方园艺,2025(20):11-22.［15］李帅.适合小果型西瓜嫁接的多抗南瓜砧木组合配制与评价［D］.武汉:华中农业大学,2024.［16］王鹏伟.南瓜嫁接西瓜砧木资源筛选与外源蔗糖对嫁接亲和性的影响［D］.新乡:河南科技学院,2025.［17］张琳玲,张立权,许林英,等.提味西瓜嫁接砧木筛选试验研究［J］.浙江农业科学,2024,65(5):1064-1067.［18］林昕原,别之龙,黄远,等.广西地区不同砧木嫁接对西瓜生长和果实品质的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2025,38(1):102-108.［19］刘欢,张辰,李晨洋,等.不同砧木嫁接对西瓜果实糖分积累及蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的影响［J］.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2026,47(1):1-8.［20］冯汝超,宫国义,尤春,等.盐城地区不同砧木对京嘉301西瓜嫁接适宜性研究［J/OL］.安徽农业科学,(2025-10-28)［2025-10-29］.https://link.cnki.net/urlid/34.1076.S.20250529.1558.002.［21］任慧转,周海姣,尧甜,等.不同砧木对西瓜断根嫁接苗生长发育的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2024,37(7):107-110,143.［22］刘广.南瓜砧木对嫁接西瓜品质影响的分子机理研究［D］.南京:南京农业大学,2018.［23］张雪莲,徐兵划,顾妍,等.嫁接条件下小果型西瓜糖分积累模式的比较分析［J］.中国瓜菜,2025,38(1):49-56.［24］李帅,宋宇,张春雨,等.不同南瓜砧木对小果型西瓜生长和果实品质的影响［J］.中国瓜菜,2024,37(8):82-91.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2026-05-19