|Table of Contents|

Physiological Response of Korla Fragrant Pear to Drought Stress in Gobi Region

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年7
Page:
34-40
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Physiological Response of Korla Fragrant Pear to Drought Stress in Gobi Region
Author(s):
LI Tianle1AN Shijie1YAN Pan2DENG Yonghui2ZHENG Qiangqing2CHEN Qiling1
(1.Tiemenguan Experimental Station,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences,Tiemenguan,Xinjiang 841000;2.Institute of Forestry and Garden,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Reclamation Sciences,Shihezi,Xinjiang 832000)
Keywords:
Gobi regionKorla fragrant peardrought stressphysiological response
PACS:
S 661.2
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20243624
Abstract:
The eight-year-old Korla Fragrant Pear was used as experimental material,the effects of drought stress on osmotic regulation substances and antioxidant enzyme activities of leaves and fruits of Korla Fragrant Pear in Gobi region were studied by using three kinds of single factor test method,in order to provide a reference for the close planting of Korla fragrant pears in Gobi region.The results showed that the antioxidant enzyme activity and the contents of proline,soluble sugar and betaine in leaves and fruits of Korla Fragrant Pear were increased under mild and moderate drought stress,while the MDA content in leaves and fruits was effectively decreased.Through principal component analysis of osmotic regulatory substances and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves and fruits of Korla fragrant pear,it was found that severe drought stress induced its own defense mechanism,so its comprehensive evaluation score was high.To sum up,the lower limit of water demand in the Gobi region of Korla fragrant pear in Tiemenguan City of the Second Division was 55% of the field capacity.

References:

[1]郭文场,刘佳贺.中国梨的产业现状、存在问题及改进措施[J].特种经济动植物,2019,22(3):47-49.[2]张绍铃,谢智华.我国梨产业发展现状、趋势、存在问题与对策建议[J].果树学报,2019,36(8):1067-1072.[3]尹立河,张俊,姜军,等.南疆地区水资源问题与对策建议[J].中国地质,2023,50(1):1-12.[4]王田利.山地果园全膜覆盖+地表径流灌溉栽培模式[J].果树实用技术与信息,2019(9):22-23.[5]刘洪波,张江辉,白云岗,等.滴灌条件下库尔勒香梨耗水特征分析[J].新疆农业科学,2014,51(12):2206-2211.[6]熊韬,闫淼,王江涛,等.盐碱胁迫对甜瓜幼苗渗透调节物质的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2021,62(12):2430-2434.[7]郑州元.硫化氢调控盐胁迫下加工番茄种子萌发及幼苗生长的生理机制研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2017.[8]娄慧敏,郑玺,王平平,等.水氮耦合对陕南烤烟渗透调节物质及抗逆生理特性的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2024,50(2):30-35.[9]闫玉静,白健,付春霞,等.根域蓄水调控对苹果叶片光合特性和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].园艺学报,2015,42(5):817-825.[10]NING D F,HAN Q S,ZHANG Y Y,et al.Responses of soil microbial community characteristics and enzyme activities to different irrigation modes over four wheat-maize rotation seasons[J].Agricultural Water Management,2024,306:109166-109169.[11]PANDITA K,KUMARI R,MALAVIYA P.Impact of short-term irrigation of diverse distillery wastewater types on plant attributes and antioxidative enzymes of pea (Pisum sativum L.var.Rachna)[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2024,31(15):22547-22559.[12]王顺,尹娟,张海军,等.不同水氮处理对马铃薯土壤酶活性和产量的影响[J].节水灌溉,2021(8):67-73.[13]江绪文,李贺勤,王建华.盐胁迫下黄芩种子萌发及幼苗对外源抗坏血酸的生理响应[J].植物生理学报,2015,51(2):166-170.[14]王树昌,于晓玲,阮孟斌,等.干旱胁迫对木薯SC5抗性生理指标的影响[J].分子植物育种,2018,16(4):1294-1299.[15]陈默,陈璐,黄晓雅,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下苗期木薯的生长生理响应[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2024,39(4):15-22.[16]姚玉涛,张国新,丁守鹏,等.盐胁迫对草莓苗期生长及氧化还原系统的影响[J].北方园艺,2021(17):22-29.[17]刘冠志,李梓豪,张艳成,等.不同生境黄柳叶片渗透调节物质含量及抗氧化酶活性研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2024,50(2):29-34.[18]王荣荣,陈天鹏,尹豪杰,等.不同抗旱性春小麦根系生长对干旱胁迫的响应及滴灌复水补偿效应[J].中国农业科学,2023,56(24):4826-4841.[19]ULLAH A,TARIQ A,ZENG F J,et al.Drought priming improves tolerance of Alhagi sparsifolia to subsequent drought:A coordinated interplay of phytohormones,osmolytes,and antioxidant potential[J].Plant Stress,2024(12):100469.[20]ZHOU Y,BAI Y H,HAN F X,et al.Transcriptome sequencing and metabolome analysis reveal the molecular mechanism of Salvia miltiorrhiza in response to drought stress[J].BMC Plant Biology,2024,24(1):446.[21]WEI S X,GAO F,WANG Z H,et al.Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal the molecular mechanisms of Albizia odoratissima′s response to drought stress[J].Plants,2024,13(19):2732-2737.[22]GAO J,ZHAO J,SHI P J,et al.Multiple response mechanisms of plants to drought stress[J].Plants,2024,13(20):2912-2918.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-04-16