|Table of Contents|

Effects of Inoculation With Five Fungi on Nutrient Elements and Physiological Characteristics of Blueberry Leaves

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2025年8
Page:
57-64
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Inoculation With Five Fungi on Nutrient Elements and Physiological Characteristics of Blueberry Leaves
Author(s):
ZHONG Fangping; XIAO Longhai; WANG Delu
(College of Forestry，Guizhou University，Guiyang,Guizhou 550025)
Keywords:
blueberry; bactericide; resistance; nutrient elements
PACS:
S 663.9
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20242687
Abstract:
The ‘Fenlan’ blueberry was used as the experimental material，and the treatments inoculated with Cladosporium cladosporioides,Chaetomium globosum,Penicillium pinophilum,Phialocephala fortinii,Schizophyllum commune，and no inoculation (CK) were set as the control treatments.The effects of inoculation on mycorrhizal infection rate，leaf nutrient element content and physiological indexes of blueberry were studied，in order to select the optimal strain to provide reference for mycorrhizal seedling of blueberry.The results showed that after inoculation，the five treatments could significantly increase the mycorrhizal infection rate of blueberry compared with CK，and the infection rate of P.fortinii was the highest，reaching 67.82%.After inoculation with P.pinophilum,P.fortinii and S.commune，the nutrient content in blueberry leaves was increased，and the utilization of light energy in blueberry was improved.Inoculation of different strains could improve antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content to varying degrees，and enhance stress resistance by reducing malondialdehyde content；through principal component analysis，it was found that the scores of these six treatments from high to low were P.fortinii,S.commune,C.cladosporioides,P.pinophilum，non-inoculated，and C.globosum.Inoculation of P.fortinii had a significant effect on improving the nutrient content and stress resistance of blueberry，which could be used as a reference strain for blueberry mycorrhizal seedlings.

References:

［1］KRISHNA P,PANDEY G,THOMAS R,et al.Improving blueberry fruit nutritional quality through physiological and genetic interventions:A review of current research and future directions［J］.Antioxidants,2023,12(4):810.［2］李亚东,姜惠铁,张志东,等.中国蓝莓产业化发展的前景［J］.沈阳农业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,3(1):39-42.［3］颜丽,杨雪莲,吴永飞,等.喀斯特地区蓝莓主栽品种花青素的抗氧化活性分析［J］.种子,2023,42(10):50-56,64.［4］詹菁,郑日华,朱芳.蓝莓品系及栽培繁育技术概述［J］.黑龙江农业科学,2017(2):144-146.［5］袁继鑫.野生蓝莓菌根真菌的分离、鉴定及接种效应［D］.北京:北京林业大学,2013.［6］陈奕璇,谢坤豪,王晓芹,等.丛枝菌根真菌对大葱幼苗生长和矿质元素吸收的影响［J］.中国蔬菜,2024(8):80-86.［7］肖龙海,王德炉,曹漫,等.接种5种菌根菌对蓝莓果实产量和品质的影响［J］.经济林研究,2021,39(1):168-175.［8］汪娅琴.深色有隔内生真菌和菌根菌混合接种对蓝莓幼苗促生抗旱的影响［D］.贵阳:贵州大学,2021.［9］张富美.蓝莓根腐病病原菌的鉴定及其生防真菌的筛选和生防机制研究［D］.贵阳:贵州大学,2021.［10］高明含.杜鹃花类菌根真菌分离及其与菌根促生细菌双接种对蓝莓生理特性的影响［D］.哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2023.［11］杨亚宁,巴雷,白晓楠,等.一种改进的丛枝菌根染色方法［J］.生态学报,2010,30(3):774-779.［12］刘臣艳.蓝莓根系对不同肥种的生态响应研究［D］.贵阳:贵州大学,2019.［13］鲍士旦.土壤农化分析［M］.3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.［14］闫静.不同肥种对蓝莓生理及果实品质的影响［D］.贵阳:贵州大学,2018.［15］郑炳松.现代植物生理生化研究技术［M］.北京:气象出版社,2006.［16］贾若凌.铜胁迫对菊芋幼叶生理生化指标的影响［J］.河南农业科学,2012,41(8):154-156.［17］孙群,胡景江.植物生理学研究技术［M］.杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社,2006.［18］张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导［M］.3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2003.［19］高俊凤.植物生理学实验指导［M］.北京:高等教育出版社,2006.［20］齐庆茹,王雷.内生菌根菌剂浓度对两种草坪草生长特性的影响［J］.北方园艺,2024(5):62-67.［21］晏梅静,补春兰,黄盖群,等.丛枝菌根真菌对桑树(Morus alba)地上部分的促进作用［J］.植物生理学报,2020,56(12):2647-2654.［22］张月欣,麻云霞,马秀枝,等.接种4种丛枝菌根真菌对榆树幼苗抗旱性的影响［J］.中国水土保持科学(中英文),2024,22(3):146-153.［23］毕银丽,宋雅宁,白雪蕊,等.AMF和DSE对紫花苜蓿生长发育及叶片代谢组分的影响［J］.菌物学报,2024,43(5):83-97.［24］冉芳,赵明,阳先波,等.外接AM真菌与施磷对毛红椿幼苗生长适应性的影响［J］.植物生理学报,2024,60(1):84-96.［25］温婷,吴靖,蔡军火,等.丛枝菌根真菌对红花石蒜植株及根际土壤养分影响［J］.江西农业大学学报，2023,45(5):1196-1207.［26］王磊,闫兴富,唐占辉.三种丛枝菌根真菌对浅裂剪秋萝生长的影响［J］.北方园艺,2021(20):77-83.［27］王幼珊,陈理,张淑彬,等.新疆天然胡杨林和野生骆驼刺丛枝菌根真菌多样性研究初报［J］.干旱区研究,2010,27(6):927-932.［28］郭艳,陈后英,铁烈华,等.外生菌根真菌橙黄硬皮马勃对不同难溶性磷酸盐供应水平下马尾松幼苗生长及生理特性的影响［J］.应用与环境生物学报,2025,31(1):87-95.［29］杨怡森,孙晨瑜,马俊卿,等.玉米接种丛枝菌根真菌后对土壤铅污染的耐受效应［J］.生态与农村环境学报,2023,39(10):1316-1322.［30］方林林,周昀晖,杨春雪.丛枝菌根-黑心菊共生体对盐碱逆境的生理响应特性［J］.西北植物学报,2023,43(3):421-431.［31］张蕊.球毛壳菌ND35对黄瓜种子萌发和幼苗促生效果及机理研究［D］.泰安:山东农业大学,2020.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-05-12