|Table of Contents|

Effects of Rice Straw Mulch on Soil and Fruit of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年24
Page:
54-61
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Rice Straw Mulch on Soil and Fruit of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grape
Author(s):
CAO Ting; LI Wentao; GU Keyu; SHEN Yu; SHI Qinghua; WANG Yonghui
(Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Coastal Area of Jiangsu Province，Yancheng，Jiangsu 224002)
Keywords:
grape; rice straw; soil aggregate
PACS:
S 663.1
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20242229
Abstract:
Taking ‘Shine Muscat’ grapes as the test material，the differences in soil moisture content，temperature，nutrient content，aggregate structure，fruit yield and quality between rice straw mulching technology and local conventional laying ground cloth were studied after mulching，in order to provide reference for optimizing and applying rice straw mulching technology in vineyards.The results showed that rice straw mulching was more effective in maintaining soil water content and reducing water evaporation than laying ground cloth;the soil temperature stability of rice straw mulch was significantly better than that of laying ground cloth，especially in the summer high temperature season，the soil temperature of rice straw mulch could be maintained less than 27 ℃，and the effect of maintaining temperature stability was remarkable.The contents of organic matter，alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available potassium in soil covered by rice straw were higher than those of laying ground cloth.The soil aggregates under rice straw mulch were mainly concentrated in small aggregates and large aggregates，and with the extension of mulch time，the content of micro-aggregates was significantly lower than that under the ground cloth.The soluble solids content of rice straw mulching fruit was significantly higher than that of laying ground cloth，and the economic benefit of rice straw mulching increased by 864 RMB per 667 m2 compared with laying ground cloth in terms of technical cost and overall benefit.

References:

［1］刘长源,焦凤丽,洪圣哲,等.不同覆盖处理对土壤酶活性和土壤养分的影响［J］.华北农学报（增刊）,2021（36）:246-252.［2］NIU L，YAN Y Y，HOU P．Influence of plastic film mulching and planting density on yield，leaf anatomy，and root characteristics of maize on the Loess Plateau［J］．The Crop Journal，2020，8(4)：548-564.［3］GAO H H，YAN C R，LIU Q．Exploring optimal soil mulching to enhance yield and water use efficiency in maize cropping in China：A meta-analysis［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2019，225：105741．［4］胡燕芳,章明奎.长期地表秸秆覆盖对果园土壤理化性状及有机碳积累的影响［J］.农学学报,2021,11(7):37-43.［5］白永会，查轩，查瑞波，等.秸秆覆盖红壤径流养分流失效益及径流剪切力影响研究［J］.水土保持学报，2017，31(6)：94-99．［6］WANG J D，ZHANG Y Q，GONG S H.Evapotranspiration，crop coefficient and yield for dripirrigated winter wheat with straw mulching in North China Plain［J］.Field Crops Research，2018，217：218-228.［7］吴海梅，逄蕾，路建龙，等.秸秆带状覆盖对土壤团聚体及团聚体有机碳含量的影响［J］.江苏农业科学，2023，51(12)：187-195．［8］张雅洁，陈晨，陈曦，等.小麦-水稻秸秆还田对土壤有机质组成及不同形态氮含量的影响［J］.农业环境科学学报，2015，34(11)：2155-2161．［9］孙奇男，张硕，朱为静，等.不同秸秆覆盖模式对桃园土壤和果实的影响［J］.浙江农业科学，2024，65(3)：618-622．［10］王晓民．红地球葡萄园秸秆覆盖栽培试验［J］.现代农业科技，2009（17）:81,84．［11］余高,赵仕龙,孙约兵,等.覆盖材料对云贵高原柑橘园土壤理化性质和细菌群落特征以及柑橘品质的影响［J］.生态学报,2024(8):1-15.［12］刘志琨,景晨娟,王端,等.不同地面覆盖对杏扁园土壤理化性质和树体生长的影响［J］.中国果树,2023(6):67-71，122.［13］赵馨雅,刘帅,徐静怡,等.覆盖作物种植对砂姜黑土团聚体稳定性及其有机碳组分的影响［J］.农业资源与环境学报,2023,40(6):1377-1387.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-01-07