|Table of Contents|

Effects of Two Endophytic Fungi on Drought Resistance of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年21
Page:
52-60
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Two Endophytic Fungi on Drought Resistance of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis
Author(s):
YANG Mingguo1LIU Shuwen1LU Junjia1MA Yunqiang2GU Xu3
(1.Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Sciences College,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming,Yunnan 650224;2.Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Yunnan Province,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming,Yunnan 650233;3.Yunnan Academy of Biodiversity,Kunming,Yunnan 650233)
Keywords:
endophytic fungiidentificationdrought resistanceLolium perennePoa pratensis
PACS:
S 543+.6
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20241052
Abstract:
Endophytic fungi JG2 and JJ12, Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis were used as the test materials.The endophytic fungi JG2 and JJ12 were identified by biological identification and morphological observation.The antioxidant capacity of strains JG2 and JJ12 was determined by total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) and free radical scavenging capacity (DPPH).Through pot experiment in greenhouse,the physiological and biochemical indexes of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis were determined under severe drought stress after irrigation with bacterial liquid.The effects of endophytic fungi JG2 and JJ12 on physiological and biochemical indexes of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis under severe drought stress were studied,in order to provide reference for the development and utilization of drought-resistant microbial agents for Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis.The results showed that strain JG2 was identified as Talaromyces erythromellis, and strain JJ12 was identified as Hypoxylon pulicicum.Both JG2 and JJ12 had good antioxidant activity.Under the severe drought stress of 21 days,the treatments of two endophytic fungal fermentations could improve the drought tolerance of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis,and significantly increase the contents of chlorophyll,soluble protein,proline (Pro) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (P<0.05).Moreover,strain JG2 improved the drought tolerance of Lolium perenne and Poa pratensis better than strain JJ12.It showed that both strains JG2 and JJ12 had good potential for development and utilization as drought-resistant microbial agents,and the development and utilization potential of strain JG2 was better than that of strain JJ12.

References:

[1]LATA R,CHOWDHURY S,GOND S K.et al.Induction of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by endophytic microbes[J].Letters in Applied Microbiology,2018,66(4):268-276.[2]高慧娟.梭梭适应模拟干旱的差异表达基因分析及 HaASR 基因的功能鉴定[D].兰州:兰州大学,2019.[3]LI M X,MA Z G.Soil moisture drought detection and multi-temporal variability across China[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2015,58(10):1798-1813.[4]牟艺菲.小麦 OPR 和LOX 基因家族的鉴定及其抗逆功能分析[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.[5]张子嘉.不同微生物菌剂对多年生黑麦草耐热性与抗旱性的影响[D].荆州:长江大学,2022.[6]聂宇东,高金永,石凤翎,等.喷施肌醇对草地早熟禾的抗旱性生理影响[J].草原与草业,2022,34(3):18-24.[7]VURUKONDA S,VARDHARAJUL A,et al.Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria[J].Microbiological Research.2016,184:13-24.[8]SATI D,PANDE V,PANDEY S C,et al.Recent advances in PGPR and molecular mechanisms involved in drought stress resistance[J].J Soil Sci Plant Nutr,2022,23(1):1-19.[9]CHEN T X,LI C J,WHITE J F,et al.Effect of the fungal endophyte Epichlo bromicola on polyamines in wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under salt stress[J].Plant and Soil,2019,436(1/2):29-48.[10]SONG M L,CHAI Q,LI X,et al.An asexual Epichlo endophyte modifies the nutrient stoichiometry of wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum) under salt stress[J].Plant and Soil,2015,387(1/2):153-165.[11]蔺伟虎,汪建军,李会强,等.不同生长条件下内生真菌对多年生黑麦草生理特性的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(8):1574-1582.[12]胡美玲,郑勇,孙翔,等.5种内生真菌对玉米幼苗抗干旱的胁迫作用[J].菌物研究,2018,16(1):28-35.[13]QIN W G,LIU,C X,JIANG W.A coumarin analogue NFA from endophytic Aspergillus fumigatus improves drought resistance in rice as an antioxidant[J].BMC Microbiology,2019,19(1):50.[14]巩文峰,孙玉,王瑞琪,等.西藏油菜种子内生菌分离及具有多种促生特性的拮抗菌筛选[J].植物保护学报,2022,49(4):1053-1062.[15]中国科学院微生物研究所《常见与常用真菌》编写组.常见与常用真菌[M].北京:科学出版社,1973.[16]李小芳,张志良.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2016.[17]杨杨.内生真菌枫香拟茎点霉B3增强水稻抗旱性机理研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2021.[18]CHAKHCHAR A,LAMAOUI M,AISSAM S,et al.Differential physiological and antioxidative responses to drought stress and recovery among four contrasting Argania Spinosa ecotypes[J].Journal of Plant Interactions,2016,11(1):30-40.[19]SAMI F,YUSUF M,FAIZAN M,et al.Role of sugars under abiotic stress[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry:PPB,2016,109:54-61.[20]黄晓露,李慈代,廖健明,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫对美国山核桃实生幼苗生理特性的影响[J].西部林业科学,2020,49(5):47-53.[21]郭春芳,孙云.干旱胁迫下植物的渗透调节及脯氨酸代谢研究进展[J].福建教育学院学报,2015,16(1):114-118,128.[22]陈珺,赖齐贤,何宝龙,等.土壤干旱对观赏植物活性氧产生和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(7):1390-1396.[23]蔺亚平,杨成行,苏家豪,等.6种高寒禾草对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J].草业科学,2021,38(12):2397-2405.[24]刘燕.深色有隔内生真菌调控红豆树生长及耐旱响应机理[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2020.[25]NACOON S,SEEMAKRAM W,EKPRASERT J,et al.Promoting growth and production of sunchoke (Heianthus tuberosus) by co-inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under drought[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2022(13),1022319-1022319.[26]安雪菲,罗旭璐,唐军荣,等.樟叶越桔根优势内生菌对宿主组培苗干旱胁迫生理的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(1):108-114.[27]邹晖,林江波,戴艺民,等.干旱胁迫下内生真菌对铁皮石斛抗旱性的影响[J].北方园艺,2020(6):119-125.[28]宋方圆.蓝莓根内深色有隔内生真菌提高蓝莓抗旱性的研究[D].烟台:鲁东大学,2017.[29]BATOOL T,ALI S,SELEIMAN M F,et al.Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria alleviates drought stress in potato in response to suppressive oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes activities[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):16975.[30]刘青柏,陆洁,刘权钢,等.土壤水分胁迫对不同酸枣无性系抗旱性的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(4):16-24.[31]赵春程,李晓宁,张寅坤,等.4个多年生黑麦草品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J].草业科学,2020,37(4):669-677.[32]马碧花,蔺伟虎,高敏,等.干旱胁迫下水杨酸和内生真菌对多年生黑麦草的影响[J].草业学报,2020,29(1):135-144.[33]SUN C,JOHNSON J M,CAI D,et al.Piriformospora indica confers drought tolerance in Chinese cabbage leaves by stimulating antioxidant enzymes,the expression of drought-related genes and the plastid-localized CAS protein[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2010,167(12):1009-1017.[34]张露露,刘兴菊,马源,等.7个常用草地早熟禾品种对立枯丝核菌侵染的生理响应[J].草原与草坪,2022,42(3):81-90.[35]董文科,马祥,毛春晖,等.10个草地早熟禾品种对白粉病的抗性评价及生理特性分析[J].草原与草坪,2020,40(3):47-56.[36]邵鹏,宋小双,廖诗贤,等.深色有隔内生真菌对干旱胁迫下樟子松生长及抗旱性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2023,43(9):15-28.[37]刘燕霞.荒漠植物沙鞭DSE对小麦促生抗旱效应研究[D].保定:河北大学,2022.[38]VERMA A K,SHAMEEM N,JATAV H S,et al.Fungal endophytes to combat biotic and abiotic stresses for climate-smart and sustainable agriculture[J].Frontiers in Plant Science,2022(13):953836.[39]HOSSEYNI M D,MAHDIEH S,SAFAIE N,et al.Desert-adapted fungal endophytes induce salinity and drought stress resistance in model crops[J].Plant Physiology and Biochemistry:PPB,2021,160:225-238.[40]HOSSEYNI M D,MAHDIEH S,SAFAIE N,et al.Inducing tolerance to abiotic stress in Hordeum vulgare L.by halotolerant endophytic fungi associated with salt lake plants[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2022(13):906365.[41]ZHOU X,DAI L,XU G F,SAFAIE N,et al.A strain of Phoma species improves drought tolerance of Pinus tabulaeformis[J].Scientific Reports,2021,11(1):7637-7637.[42]WAQAS M,KHAN A L,KAMRAN M,SAFAIE N,et al.Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress[J].Molecules (Basel,Switzerland),2012,17(9):10754-10773.[43]胡桂馨,王代军,刘荣堂.干旱胁迫下内生真菌对高羊茅保护酶活性的影响[J].草原与草坪,2001(1):28-31.[44]梁青兰,韩友吉,乔艳辉,等.干旱胁迫对黑杨派无性系生长及生理特性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2023,45(10):81-89.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-11-21