|Table of Contents|

Effects of Returning Tomato Straw in Greenhouse and Reducing Fertilizer Application on Yield,Quality and Nutrient Absorption of Cucumber

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年14
Page:
43-50
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Returning Tomato Straw in Greenhouse and Reducing Fertilizer Application on Yield,Quality and Nutrient Absorption of Cucumber
Author(s):
LIU Xinxin; WANG Huimin; ZHANG Xiu; WU Fengzhi
(School of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150030)
Keywords:
returning straw; cucumber; yield; quality; nutrient absorption
PACS:
S 642.2
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20240530
Abstract:
Cucumis sativus L. was used as the test material.After pulling tomato seedlings in autumn in the greenhouse,four treatments were carried out,non-returning straw and topdressing once and twice (CK1,CK2),returning straw and topdressing once and twice (T1,T2).The effects of returning straw and reducing fertilizer on yield,quality and nutrient uptake in the second spring crop cucumber were studied,in order to provide reference for the cultivation and management of greenhouse vegetables.The results showed that compared with the non-returning treatment,the yield of returning tomato straw treatment was significantly increased.Among them,the yield of returning straw and topdressing once treatment was significantly higher than that of non-returning treatment,and the yield of returning straw and topdressing twice treatment was significantly higher than that of topdressing once treatment.The quality of returning tomato straw treatment showed no significant difference between the topdressing once and twice treatments,but both treatments were significantly higher than those non-returning straw.After 50 days of planting,returning straw significantly improved the absorption of nitrogen and phosphorus by plants,and increased potassium absorption by 70 days.At 50 days and 70 days,the absorption of trace element silicon was significantly increased.At 30 days and 70 days,the soil pH was increased,and at 50 days the soil EC value was significantly reduced.At 70 days,the EC value of returning straw and topdressing once treatment was significantly lower than that of non-returning treatment.The bulk density was significantly decreased and the porosity was significantly increased in returning straw and topdressing once.Therefore,we concluded that returning straw and topdressing once is feasible in application.

References:

［1］毕于运，王亚静，高春雨．中国主要秸秆资源数量及其区域分布［J］．农机化研究，2010，32(3)：1-7.［2］于美婷，李春雅，李华泰，等．秸秆还田对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展［J］．江西农业学报，2021，33(1)：33-39.［3］刘长龙．设施番茄秸秆分解特性与条件研究［D］．泰安：山东农业大学，2021.［4］宋大利，侯胜鹏，王秀斌，等．中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力［J］．植物营养与肥料学报，2018，24(1)：1-21.［5］黄婷苗，王朝辉，侯仰毅，等．施氮对关中还田玉米秸秆腐解和养分释放特征的影响［J］．应用生态学报，2017，28(7)：2261-2268.［6］李艳，李玉梅，刘峥宇，等．秸秆还田对连作玉米黑土团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响［J］．土壤与作物，2019，8(2)：129-138.［7］李潇雅，陈晓璐，张大龙，等．蔬菜秸秆还田对日光温室黄瓜连作土壤理化性状及植株生长和产量的影响［J］．山东农业科学，2021，53(11)：88-93.［8］朱金霞，孔德杰，尹志荣．农作物秸秆主要化学组成及还田后对土壤质量提升影响的研究进展［J］．北方园艺，2020(5)：146-153.［9］王锡增，徐浴力，周昕，等．玉米青秸秆还田对土壤理化性状及连作黄瓜生长发育的影响［J］．扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版)，2022，43(6)：37-43，110.［10］沈伟棋，邵建均，宁国云，等．稻麦套播下秸秆机械还田对作物生长及土壤养分的影响［J］．安徽农学通报，2020，26(11)：112-116，139.［11］黄巧义，黄建凤，黄旭，等．早稻秸秆还田和减钾对晚稻产量和土壤肥力的影响［J］．环境科学，2022，43(10)：4706-4715.［12］吴凤芝，王叶群，王慧敏，等．大棚黄瓜秸秆原位还田对番茄生长及土壤环境的影响［J］．东北农业大学学报，2022，53(12)：18-25.［13］李合生．植物生理生化实验原理和技术［M］．北京：高等教育出版社，2000.［14］张志良，瞿伟菁．植物生理学实验指导［M］.3版．台北县：艺轩图书出版社，2009.［15］宫再英．秸秆残体还田对黄瓜幼苗生长及土壤微生物菌群的影响［D］．哈尔滨：东北农业大学，2016.［16］秦都林，王双磊，刘艳慧，等．滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及棉花产量的影响［J］．作物学报，2017，43(7)：1030-1042.［17］鲁天平，史征，刘永萍，等．深沟造林条件下秸秆覆盖对土壤养分和盐分变化的影响［J］．农业工程学报，2015，31(12)：165-172.［18］谷端银，高俊杰，焦娟，等．设施土壤酸化研究现状、产生机理及防治措施［J］．化工管理，2016(34)：84-86.［19］马庆旭，王峻，曹小闯，等．土壤pH对玉米与微生物竞争吸收氨基酸的影响［J］．应用生态学报，2017，28(7)：2277-2284.［20］梁萌，王志方，马健，等．还田棉秆腐解与土壤理化性质对氮肥施用的响应特征［J］．新疆农业科学，2021，58(8)：1427-1434.［21］王娇，王鸿斌，赵兴敏，等．添加秸秆对不同有机含量土壤酸度及缓冲性能的影响［J］．水土保持学报，2020，34(6)：361-368.［22］韩伶，李衍素，于贤昌，等．日光温室蔬菜残株堆腐后还田对根区土壤环境及蔬菜产量的影响［J］．应用生态学报，2016，27(5)：1553-1559.［23］黄婷苗，郑险峰，王朝辉．还田玉米秸秆氮释放对关中黄土供氮和冬小麦氮吸收的影响［J］．中国农业科学，2015，48(14)：2785-2795.［24］GAO D，AN D，LIU J，et al．Wheat cover crop alters soil microbial community and increases cucumber yield under different potassium regimes［J］．European Journal of Agronomy，2022，139：126567.［25］安冬梅．小麦填闲及减量施钾对黄瓜产量及养分吸收的影响［D］．哈尔滨：东北农业大学，2019.［26］李长洲，袁国印，王一柳，等．秸秆还田配施钾肥对水稻产量与钾素吸收的影响［J］．江苏农业科学，2021，49(2)：43-47.［27］张聪，慕平，尚建明．长期持续秸秆还田对土壤理化特性、酶活性和产量性状的影响［J］．水土保持研究，2018，25(1)：92-98.［28］张鑫尧，王箫璇，陈磊，等．钾肥减施对稻麦轮作区作物产量和品质的影响［J］．植物营养与肥料学报，2022，28(4)：575-588.［29］王擎运，张佳宝，赵炳梓，等．不同施肥方式对典型壤质潮土中微量元素积累及其有效性的影响［J］．土壤学报，2012，49(6)：1104-1113.［30］张丽，王寅，鲁剑巍，等．施钾对直播油菜产量及钾钙镁养分吸收的影响［J］．中国油料作物学报，2015，37(3)：336-343.［31］武际，郭熙盛，鲁剑巍，等．连续秸秆覆盖对土壤无机氮供应特征和作物产量的影响［J］．中国农业科学，2012，45(9)：1741-1749.［32］AHMED M，AHMAD S，FAYYAZ-UL-HASSAN，et al．Innovative processes and technologies for nutrient recovery from wastes：A comprehensive review［J］．Sustainability，2019，11(18)：4938.［33］李继福，鲁剑巍，任涛，等．稻田不同供钾能力条件下秸秆还田替代钾肥效果［J］．中国农业科学，2014，47(2)：292-302.［34］马荣辉，梁金英，王宪刚，等．化肥减量配施有机肥对设施番茄产量、品质和土壤肥力的影响［J］．北方园艺，2023(24)：45-51．［35］秦伟，刘震，陈昆，等．硅元素对西瓜生理特征及矿质元素积累的影响［J］．天津农业科学，2020，26(4)：11-14.［36］王立革，孙晓姝，王媛，等．秸秆还田及钾肥减量对设施黄瓜钾钙镁含量和土壤钾形态的影响［J］．山西农业科学，2021，49(4)：461-466.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-08