|Table of Contents|

Diversity of Soil Microorganisms (Bacteria) Under Herbaceous Conditions in Orchards in Arid and Semi-arid Areas

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年14
Page:
77-85
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Diversity of Soil Microorganisms (Bacteria) Under Herbaceous Conditions in Orchards in Arid and Semi-arid Areas
Author(s):
LI Xiaolong; MA Jun; CHU Yannan; YUE Haiying; JIA Yonghua; TIAN Jianwen
(Institute of Horticulture，Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry，Yinchuan，Ningxia 750001)
Keywords:
arid and semi-arid regions; orchard grassing; bacterial community
PACS:
S 153;S 154.3
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20234577
Abstract:
Four grass species (ryegrass，alfalfa，tall fescue，villous wild pea) with the potential for ‘green fertilizer’ function were selected，and natural grassing and clean-tillage modes were carried out long-term grassing treatment in the orchard rows，and high-throughput sequencing technology was applied to analyze the changes in the structure，quantity，and function of the soil bacterial community in the orchard under different grassing modes,in order to provide a reference for the rational grassing of orchards and the sustainable development of apple production in arid and semi-arid zones.The results showed that,the bacterial OTUs under the grassing treatment were categorized into 39 known bacterial phyla，94 orders，266 orders，541 families and 127 genera.Among them，alfalfa (458 OTUs) and natural grassing (531 OTUs) had more population-specific OTUs，followed by ryegrass and villous wild pea treatments，and the soil of the grassing treatment was significantly enriched with beneficial microorganisms such as Bacteroidetes，Clostridia，Actinobacteria，Ascomycetes，Bacteriophage，Oxalobacteria，Pseudomonas，and Bacteroides，in comparison with clean-tillage.PCoA principal components，Adonis intergroup analysis of variance (AOVA)，and alpha diversity (ACE index) further indicated that the composition of soil bacterial communities was mainly affected by the raw grass treatments，with the differences in bacterial communities as well as bacterial diversity in soil samples from natural grassing，alfalfa，and villous wild pea treatment areas being more significant.In addition，the differential metabolic pathways under natural grass，alfalfa and villous wild pea grass treatments mainly focused on carbohydrate metabolism，amino acid metabolism，energy metabolism，transmembrane transport，and nucleotide metabolism，with average abundances of 13.6%，9.5%，4.2%，3.4%，and 3.2%，respectively.In summary，the grassing treatment could affect the bacterial community structure，which the natural grassing，alfalfa，and villous wild pea haying further significantly contributed to the function of the bacterial community.

References:

［1］BILLMAN E D，MORRISON J I，BALDWIN B S.Breeding heat tolerant orchardgrass germplasm for summer persistence in high temperature stress environments of the southeastern United States［J］.Crop Science，2021，61(3)：1915-1925.［2］GURMESSA B，ASHWORTH A J，YANG Y，et al.Soil bacterial diversity based on management and topography in a silvopastoral system［J］.Applied Soil Ecology，2021，163：103918.［3］杨梅,王亚亚,陆姣云,等.典型果园生草模式及果草系统资源调控研究进展［J］.草业学报,2017,26(9):189-199.［4］田娜,王义祥,翁伯琦.土壤碳储量估算研究进展［J］.亚热带农业研究,2010,6(3):193-198.［5］吴玉森,张艳敏,冀晓昊,等.自然生草对黄河三角洲梨园土壤养分、酶活性及果实品质的影响［J］.中国农业科学,2013,46(1):99-108.［6］陈修会,刘相东,林庆团,等.沂蒙山区果园生草技术［J］.中国果菜,2015,35(2):53-57.［7］陈学森,张瑞洁,王艳廷,等.苹果园种植长柔毛野豌豆结合自然生草对土壤综合肥力的影响［J］.园艺学报,2016,43(12):2325-2334.［8］LI L，CHEN P，WANG K，et al.Gramineae-legumes mixed planting effectively reduces soil and nutrient loss in orchards［J］.Agricultural Water Management，2023，289：108513.［9］王光州.土壤微生物调节植物种间互作和多样性：生产力关系的机制［D］.北京：中国农业大学,2018.［10］翟婉璐,钟哲科,高贵宾,等.覆盖经营对雷竹林土壤细菌群落结构演变及多样性的影响［J］.林业科学,2017,53(9):133-142.［11］LI X，CHU Y，JIA Y，et al.Changes to bacterial communities and soil metabolites in an apple orchard as a legacy effect of different intercropping plants and soil management practices［J］.Frontiers in Microbiology，2022（13）：956840.［12］沈鹏飞,王威雁,李彤,等.陕西洛川苹果园不同覆盖措施对土壤性质、细菌群落及果实产量和品质的影响［J］.园艺学报,2019,46(5):817-831.［13］张存杰,廖要明,段居琦,等.我国干湿气候区划研究进展［J］.气候变化研究进展,2016,12(4):261-267.［14］WANG Y X，WENG B Q，YE J，et al.Carbon sequestration in a nectarine orchard as affected by green manure in China［J］.European Journal of Horticultural Science，2015，80(5)：208-215.［15］焦奎宝.生草制苹果园土壤微生物群落结构与功能特征研究［D］.沈阳：沈阳农业大学,2014.［16］李鑫.桑树/苜蓿间作生长优势与土壤微生物种群多样性研究［D］.哈尔滨：东北林业大学,2016.［18］龚赛.林下大球盖菇栽培对土壤养分及微生物的影响［D］.泰安：山东农业大学,2017.［19］黄俊杰,陆雅海.土壤拟杆菌与梭菌分解多糖类有机物质的研究进展与展望［J］.微生物学通报,2022,49(3):1147-1157.［20］DANG C，WALKUP J G V，HUNGATE B A，et al.Phylogenetic organization in the assimilation of chemically distinct substrates by soil bacteria［J］.Environmental Microbiology，2022，24(1)：357-369.［21］王悦,艾方秋,黄欣,等.黄瓜根际土壤产氰假单胞菌筛选及其产氰特性研究［J］.扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2019,40(3):117-122.［22］TAO C，LI R，XIONG W，et al.Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression［J］.Microbiome，2020(8)：1-14.［23］汪景宽,徐英德,丁凡,等.植物残体向土壤有机质转化过程及其稳定机制的研究进展［J］.土壤学报,2019,56(3):528-540.［24］DAS B，CHAKRABORTY D，SINGH V K，et al.Effect of integrated nutrient management practice on soil aggregate properties，its stability and aggregate-associated carbon content in an intensive rice-wheat system［J］.Soil and Tillage Research，2014，136：9-18.［25］PRESCOTT C E.Litter decomposition：what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils?［J］.Biogeochemistry，2010，101：133-149.［26］CASTELLANO M J，MUELLER K E，OLK D C，et al.Integrating plant litter quality，soil organic matter stabilization，and the carbon saturation concept［J］.Global Change Biology，2015，21(9)：3200-3209.［27］COTRUFO M F，SOONG J L，HORTON A J，et al.Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss［J］.Nature Geoscience,2015(8)：776-779.［28］王加国,李苇洁,吴迪,等.鼠茅草对猕猴桃果园抑草效果及土壤肥力的影响［J］.中国南方果树,2022,51(4):109-113.［29］杨凤梅,吉前华,关晓银,等.柑橘果园杂草发生特点与防控措施综述［J］.生物灾害科学,2023,46(2):229-235.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-08