|Table of Contents|

Research Progress on Causes and Prevention Measures of the Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Paeonia suffruticosa

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年14
Page:
129-135
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research Progress on Causes and Prevention Measures of the Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Paeonia suffruticosa
Author(s):
YANG Ruixian1LIU Ping1LIU Changying2REN Weiguang1CHEN Yuquan1ZHOU Bingyi1
(1.Department of Environmental Engineering and Chemistry,Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology,Luoyang,Henan 471023;2.Luoyang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Luoyang,Henan 471023)
Keywords:
Paeonia suffruticosacontinuous cropping obstacleprevention technologyrhizospheric biocontrol consortia
PACS:
S 608
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20234228
Abstract:
Paeonia suffruticosa is a traditional ornamental plant with oil and medicinal values.The continuous cropping obstacles (CCO) resulting in the decline of yield and quality of P.suffruticosa,and is an important factor that restricts the sustainable development of tree peony industry.Previous studies showed that the main causes of the continuously monocultured P.suffruticosa were autotoxicity of root exudates,accumulation of soil-borne pathogens,imbalance of rhizosphere soil microbial community and destruction of soil physiochemical properties.At present,reported measures to alleviate the CCO of P.suffruticosa include intercropping,soil sterilization and application of chemical pesticide.However,these measures had some shortcomings,such as high cost,difficulty in operation,instability of effectiveness and unsustainable.Therefore,the interaction mechanism of P.suffruticosa-root exudates-soil-microorganisms is explored in order to further elucidate the causes of continuously monocultured P.suffruticosa.On this basis,a new approaches to alleviate the CCO of P.suffruticosa was provided,which is constructed rhizospheric biocontrol consortia.Moreover,research on the mechanisms of the CCO of P.suffruticosa should be further expanded to provide reference for promoting and guaranteeing the sustainable development of tree peony industry.

References:

[1]刘逢璐,高杰,黄至欢.牡丹种质资源保护与利用研究进展[J].北方园艺,2022(16):134-143.[2]裴姿琛,胡永宏,刘泽,等.新型木本油料作物:油用牡丹的开发和利用[J].林业与生态科学,2018,33(4):358-363.[3]张凤云,成雪峰,张猛,等.油用牡丹效益调查与分析研究[J].菏泽学院学报,2022,44(5):97-102.[4]吕令华,张继雨,尉菊萍,等.我国油药两用牡丹产业发展现状与提升对策[J].山东农业科学,2023,55(2):159-164.[5]朱珏,石雨荷,李晴,等.百合种质资源遗传多样性及连作障碍研究进展[J].北方园艺,2023(9):126-132.[6]PERVAIZ Z H,IQBAL J,ZHANG Q,et al.Continuous cropping alters multiple biotic and abiotic indicators of soil health[J].Soil Systems,2020,4(4):59.[7]杨瑞先,王祖华,赵梓轩,等.牡丹根际微生物的研究进展[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(6):29-33.[8]覃逸明,聂刘旺.药用牡丹的自毒作用及其防治措施[J].生物学杂志,2009,26(6):76-79.[9]ZEESHAN UL HAQ M,YU J,YAO G,et al.A systematic review on the continuous cropping obstacles and control strategies in medicinal plants[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2023,24(15):12470.[10]MA Z,GUAN Z,LIU Q,et al.Obstacles in continuous cropping:Mechanisms and control measures[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2023.[11]钟淑敏,廖晓兰.作物自毒作用研究进展[J].作物研究,2022,36(3):269-274,286.[12]ZHAO D D,JIANG L L,LI H Y,et al.Chemical components and pharmacological activities of terpene natural products from the genus Paeonia[J].Molecules,2016,21(10):1362.[13]郝青.中国古牡丹资源调查及衰老相关研究[D].北京:中国科学院植物研究所,2008.[14]覃逸明,聂刘旺,黄雨清,等.凤丹(Paeonia ostii T.)自毒物质的检测及其作用机制[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1153-1161.[15]瞿瑜婷,张前前,俞叶飞,等.根际微生态视角下药用植物连作障碍机制和缓解措施研究进展[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2022,48(4):403-414.[16]DE FARIA M R,COSTA L S A S,CHIARAMONTE J B,et al.The rhizosphere microbiome:functions,dynamics,and role in plant protection[J].Tropical Plant Pathology,2021,46(1):13-25.[17]耿晓东,周英,汪成忠,等.不同种植年限对凤丹牡丹根际真菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(23):145-151.[18]李昱莹,刘曙光,廉小芳,等.油用牡丹‘凤丹’不同种植年限根际真菌群落多样性变化研究[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2020,39(4):1672-1685.[19]王雪山,杜秉海,姚良同,等.种植年限对牡丹根际土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(4):508-516.[20]XUE D,HUANG X.Changes in soil microbial community structure with planting years and cultivars of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa)[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2014,30(2):389-397.[21]郭丽丽,尹伟伦,郭大龙,等.油用凤丹牡丹不同种植时间根际细菌群落多样性变化[J].林业科学,2017,53(11):131-141.[22]杨瑞先,刘萍,汪玉婷,等.洛阳地区牡丹根腐病病原菌的分离与鉴定[J].北方园艺,2021(1):59-66.[23]姬俊华,杨瑞先,刘萍,等.牡丹根腐病病株和健株根内微生物菌群的差异[J].河南农业科学,2022,51(11):98-108.[24]JIA M,SUN X,CHEN M,et al.Deciphering the microbial diversity associated with healthy and wilted Paeonia suffruticosa rhizosphere soil[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2022,13:967601.[25]史冬燕,王宜磊.牡丹根际微生物区系及土壤酶活的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013(6):15-17.[26]焦艳阳,林煜,蔡昭莹,等.不同技术迭代对太子参连作障碍的消减效果及作用机制[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2485-2495.[27]卢维宏,张乃明,包立,等.我国设施栽培连作障碍特征与成因及防治措施的研究进展[J].土壤,2020,52(4):651-658.[28]胡国彬,董坤,董艳,等.间作缓解蚕豆连作障碍的根际微生态效应[J].生态学报,2016,36(4):1010-1020.[29]常可可.‘凤丹’牡丹立体栽培模式下土壤肥力及丹皮品质研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2020.[30]陈慧,王改萍,彭方仁,等.薄壳山核桃-油用牡丹复合经营下土壤质量评价[J/OL].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),(2023-03-08)[2023-12-05].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1161.S.20230307.1625.002.html.[31]周江华,刘慧春,朱开元,等.油用牡丹‘凤丹’套种巨峰葡萄栽培技术[J].林业科技通讯,2022(9):56-57.[32]许文营,智利红.豫西丘陵地区油用牡丹套作朝天椒技术[J].北方园艺,2020(5):172-175.[33]徐绍清,刘清,黄士文,等.我国油用牡丹与林木的间作套种概况[J].现代园艺,2017(14):28-30.[34]徐建强,张吕醉,唐慧骥,等.洛阳市牡丹病害种类及其症状识别[J].中国森林病虫,2018,37(1):35-38.[35]王桢,贺春玲,侯小改,等.6种杀菌剂对牡丹根腐病菌的室内毒力测定[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(17):132-133,137.[36]牛慧芳.6种杀菌剂对油用牡丹根腐病的室内毒力及田间防效测定[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2017,40(3):43-45.[37]SARPONG C K,ZHANG X,WANG Q,et al.Improvement of plant microbiome using inoculants for agricultural production:A sustainable approach for reducing fertilizer application[J].Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2021,101(1):1-11.[38]WU L,YANG B,LI M,et al.Modification of rhizosphere bacterial community structure and functional potentials to control Pseudostellaria heterophylla replant disease[J].Plant Disease,2020,104(1):25-34.[39]刘双.山西油用牡丹根腐病根际土壤微生态与生物防治研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020.[40]毛咪,吕长平,帅佳琪,等.牡丹根腐病拮抗菌MRX2-1的鉴定及发酵条件优化[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(4):28-36.[41]杨瑞先,刘萍,王祖华,等.牡丹根腐病原菌拮抗细菌抑菌活性物质分析[J].生物技术通报,2022,38(2):57-66.[42]沈佳佳,侯小改,王二强,等.油用牡丹根际解有机磷细菌的筛选及解磷功能研究[J].生物技术通报,2022,38(6):157-165.[43]黄娴,张兴伟,王震洪.添加生物炭对黄壤种植油用牡丹生长的影响[J].山地农业生物学报,2018,37(2):74-79.[44]LI C,CHEN G,ZHANG J,et al.The comprehensive changes in soil properties are continuous cropping obstacles associated with American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) cultivation[J].Scientific Reports,2021(11):5068.[45]CHEN Y,DU J,LI Y,et al.Evolutions and managements of soil microbial community structure drove by continuous cropping[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2022(13):839494.[46]王卫雄,沈博,贾洪柏,等.根际生防菌群的应用及其防病增效的潜在机制[J].生物技术通报,2020,36(9):31-41.[47]PANDHAL J,NOIREL J.Synthetic microbial ecosystems for biotechnology[J].Biotechnology Letters,2014,36(6):1141-1151.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-08-08