|Table of Contents|

Study on Phenological Monitoring of Malus ‘Prairifire’ Flower Stage Based on UAV Imaging Technology

《北方园艺》[ISSN:1001-0009/CN:23-1247/S]

Issue:
2024年10
Page:
47-54
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Phenological Monitoring of Malus ‘Prairifire’ Flower Stage Based on UAV Imaging Technology
Author(s):
FAN Junjun1JIANG Wenlong2LIU Xingchen3XIA Chongli1ZHANG Wangxiang3HUANG Jun4
(1.College of Horticulture,Jinling Institute of Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210038;2.Nanjing GTMAP Information Industry Co.Ltd.,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000;3.College of Forestry and Grassland,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210037;4.Nanjing Zhu Lu Jing Guan Engineering Co.Ltd.,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210028)
Keywords:
UAV imaging technologyM.‘Prairifire’flowering phenologycolor parametermonitoring
PACS:
S 722.5
DOI:
10.11937/bfyy.20233782
Abstract:
Based on UAV imaging technology,images of the phenological period of Malus ‘Prairifire’ were collected,color parameter values (CIE L*,a*,b*) were extracted,and color difference values (ΔE) for different sampling points of phenological periods were calculated.The dynamic monitoring of the flowering phenology of crabapple was realized by comparing ΔE,in order to provide reference for grasping the dynamic phenological changes of crabapple in real time and making timely adjustment strategies,and also provide reference for flower phenological study.The results showed that,1) the color parameters of aerial images of M. ‘Prairifire’ were extracted by Photoshop software.The phenological periods were cluster analyzed based on the phenological color parameters,which could be divided into the germination stage,leaf spreading stage,budding stage,initial flowering stage,full flowering stage,final flowering stage,defoliation stage,fruiting stage,and dormant stage.2) The range of color differences in each phenology period (△E1) and of adjacent phenological periods (△E2) were obtained.A phenological discrimination method was established based on the maximum color difference △E1 max′ in each phenological period and the minimum color difference △E2 min′ between different phenological periods.3) The color parameters of M. ‘Prairifire’ phenological images on two dates (March 22th and April 10th) were randomly selected.The phenological periods of the two dates were determined by cluster analysis to be in the budding stage and full flowering stage respectively,which were consistent with reality.The color difference (ΔE2′) of phenological images between the two dates was 21.8,which was higher than theminimum color difference from the budding stage to the early flowering stage(△E2 min=9.6).This indicated a larger phenological span between these phenological images,which were consistent with reality.In conclusion,this method could easily and efficiently judge the phenological stage of the flowering crabapple.

References:

[1]郝日明,张璐,张明娟,等.影响南京地区桂花秋季开花期变化的关键气候因子研究[J].植物资源与环境学报,2006,15(3):31-34.[2]FORNARA F,PANIGRAHI K C S,GISSOT L,et al.Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response[J].Developmental Cell,2009,17(1):75-86.[3]LUO X,GAO Z,WANG Y,et al.The nuclear factor-constans complex antagonizes polycomb repression to de-repress flowering locus t expression in response to inductive long days in Arabidopsis[J].The Plant Journal:for Cell and Molecular Biology,2018,95(1):17-29.[4]尹玉莹,房林,李琳,等.兜兰属植物花期调控研究进展[J].热带作物学报,2022,43(4):769-778.[5]杜军,次旺,白宇轩,等.西藏林芝苹果花期与气象条件的关系及预测模型[J].果树学报,2023,40(5):1013-1023.[6]邬定荣,霍治国,王培娟,等.陕西苹果花期机理性预报模型的适用性评价[J].应用气象学报,2019,30(5):555-564.[7]GRAB S,CRAPARO A.Advance of apple and pear tree full bloom dates in response to climate change in the southwestern Cape,South Africa:1973-2009[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(3):406-413.[8]施婷婷,杨秀莲,王良桂.‘波叶金桂’ 花香成分的释放规律[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,61(2):97-104.[9]王文静,吕思佳,汪庆昊,等.植物花香物质代谢与调控研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2021,19(22):7612-7617.[10]KANG S,RUNNING S W,LIM J H,et al.A regional phenology model for detecting onset of greenness in temperate mixed forests,Korea:An application of MODIS leaf area index[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2003,86(2):232-242.[11]CHEN L,HUANG J G,MA Q,et al.Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species[J].Global Change Biology,2019,25(3):997-1004.[12]张往祥,魏宏亮,江志华,等.观赏海棠品种群的花期物候特征研究[J].园艺学报,2014,41(4):713-725.[13]储吴樾,范俊俊,张往祥.观赏海棠花期物候稳定性及其对温度变化的响应[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,44(5):49-54.[14]范俊俊.观赏海棠花朵香型分析与判别模型构建[D].南京:南京林业大学,2019.[15]徐岩,张聪伶,降瑞娇,等.无人机高光谱影像与冠层树种多样性监测[J].生物多样性,2021,29(5):647-660.[16]何勇,杜晓月,郑力源,等.无人机飞行高度对植被覆盖度和植被指数估算结果的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(24):63-72.[17]陶惠林,徐良骥,冯海宽,等.基于无人机数码影像的冬小麦株高和生物量估算[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(19):107-116.[18]汪哲弘,徐海松.用阴极射线管显示器研究辨色阈值Ⅰ:实验数据及人眼颜色视觉特性分析[J].光学学报,2007,27(6):1139-1144.[19]RICH D C,OKUMURA Y,LOVELL V.The effect of spectrocolorimeter reproducibility on a fully color-managed print production workflow[J].Conference on Colour in Graphics,Imaging,and Vision,2008,4(1):77-79.[20]涂润林.基于光物性的鸭梨黑心病无损检测方法的研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2004.[21]周蓉,蒋芳玲,梁梅,等.用色差仪法定量分析番茄果实番茄红素的含量[J].江西农业学报,2012,24(9):45-48,50.[22]张往祥,江志华,裘靓,等.观赏海棠花色时序动态分布格局研究[J].园艺学报,2013,40(3):505-514.[23]姜文龙,范俊俊,张丹丹,等.观赏海棠不同叶位色彩特征及特异种质挖掘[J].园艺学报,2017,44(6):1135-1144.[24]张丹丹,范俊俊,王欢,等.不同观赏海棠种质果色动态变化规律研究[J].经济林研究,2017,35(3):161-167.[25]李岩舟,覃锋,顾渝娟,等.基于无人机遥感的盛花期薇甘菊监测技术[J].农业机械学报,2022,53(11):244-254.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-06-06